علی رغم اینکه مدلهای Claude همیشه تو برنامه نویسی و کدزدن یه سر و گردن از بقیه بالاتر بودن یا حداقل من این طور حس میکنم، به نظرم OpenAI توی مجموعه مدل 5.6 خیلی خوب عمل کرده و پیشرفت و خروجیهای بسیار قابل ملاحظهای داشته. @code2_ir

Channel
code2 - تکنولوژی و فناوری
@code2_ir
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
313subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001802773001 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @code2_ir |
| Created | Between 1 September 2022 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 24 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/code2_ir |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 313 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 01:36 | 314 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 315 | +4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 311 | no change |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:30 | 311 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 11m 11s
- Average length
- 2m 48s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 80.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🚨 مانوس موقتاً رایگان شد شرکت Manus در حال بازگشت به فعالیت مستقل است و به همین دلیل یک دوره انتقالی برای سرویس در نظر گرفته شده. تا 25 آگوست 2026 استفاده از مانوس بدون مصرف Credit امکانپذیر است: مدلهای Manus 1.6 و Manus 1.6 Lite در دسترس هستند. استفاده از Agentها Credit مصرف نمیکند. ⚠️ اگر قبلاً از Manus استفاده کردهاید، این بخش مهم است: بهدلیل جدایی Manus از Meta و الزامات رگولاتوری، بخشی از دادههای کارب…
🚨 هشدار امنیتی مهم برای کاربران Metabase اگر از Metabase استفاده میکنید، بهخصوص اگر آن را بهصورت Self-hosted اجرا میکنید، این هشدار امنیتی را جدی بگیرید. اخیراً یک آسیبپذیری ناشناخته (0-day) در نسخههای Metabase 1.58 و بالاتر مورد سوءاستفاده قرار گرفته است. این آسیبپذیری میتواند به مهاجم اجازه دهد SQL دلخواه روی دیتابیس داخلی Metabase اجرا کند و در نهایت به دسترسی Administrator برسد. در صورت موفقیت حمله، مهاج…
گویا این اشتباه و همون daemon صحیح هست
اشتباه اگر از لینوکس استفاده میکنید حتما با systemd آشنا هستید و احتمالا فکر میکردید که منظور از d توی systemd عبارت daemon هست ولی اینطور نیست و اینطور که پیداست صرفا نشانگر ترتیب هست @code2_ir
🚨 یه خبر مهم برای دنیای AI و برنامهنویسی: Anaconda، Kilo Code رو خرید. اگر اسم Kilo Code رو نشنیدید، یکی از محبوبترین AI Coding Agentهای متنبازه که بیش از ۳ میلیون توسعهدهنده ازش استفاده میکنن و روی VS Code، JetBrains، CLI و وب کار میکنه. از همه جالبتر اینکه با ۵۰۰+ مدل هوش مصنوعی سازگاره و شما رو به یک Provider خاص محدود نمیکنه. ولی اصل ماجرا خود خرید نیست؛ هدف Anaconda خیلی بزرگتره. الان خیلی از شرکته…
یکی اومده برای انتقال فایل بین دو گوشی یه ابزار نوشته که فایل رو تبدیل به QRCode میکنه و پشت هم نشون میده و گوشی دوم با اسکن اونها فایل رو دانلود میکنه و میچسبونه به هم. سرعت حدود 140 کیلوبایت داره https://github.com/bashalarmistalt/decimen-optical-transfer/ @DevTwitter | <mrdoob/>
👍1
اوه اوه 😂🫣😵 #programming_joke 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ @programming_tips
از حدود ۲۰ دقیقه پیش چتجیپیتی با اختلال روبرو شده! 📉⚠️ به گیرندههای خودتون دست نزنید اشکال از فرستنده است! 📡🚫 @code2_ir
😄 در لیندکین چه میگذرد؟ منبع @code2_ir
🚀 تمدید افزایش سقف استفاده در Claude Code و Claude Cowork شرکت Anthropic دو پروموشن موقت خود را تمدید کرده است: 💻 Claude Code تا ۱۹ آگوست ۲۰۲۶ (چهارشنبه، ۲۸ مرداد ۱۴۰۵) * ✅ افزایش ۵۰٪ سقف استفاده هفتگی * ❌ محدودیتهای ۵ ساعته تغییری نکردهاند. 🤝 Claude Cowork تا ۵ آگوست ۲۰۲۶ (چهارشنبه، ۱۴ مرداد ۱۴۰۵) * ✅ افزایش ۲ برابری سقف استفاده ۵ ساعته * ❌ سقف هفتگی تغییری نکرده است. 📌 این طرحها شامل کاربران پلنهای Pr…
قسمت ۲ - نصب و راهاندازی Cursor توی این قسمت Cursor رو از صفر نصب و آمادهی استفاده میکنیم. بعد از دیدن این قسمت، Cursor روی سیستم شما آماده است و میتونید همراه با قسمتهای بعدی اولین پروژهتون رو با کمک هوش مصنوعی بسازید. 💻 @code2_ir #Cursor #AI #Programming #Code2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @code2_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@nimaebrahimi_1 · 52,320
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 24 August 2026
@Software_computerr · 41,223
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“code2 - تکنولوژی و فناوری” (@code2_ir), 313 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/code2_ir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.