Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Code Insights🎗

Channel

Code Insights🎗

@code_insights

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

61subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002358358231
TypeChannel
Username@code_insights
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/code_insights

Growth

586159.58 August 2026 — 58 subscribers10 August 2026 — 58 subscribers17 August 2026 — 61 subscribers8 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 58–61 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 10:2561+3
10 Aug 2026, 06:0158no change
8 Aug 2026, 09:3558first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 30 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

25 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍728.0%
😁728.0%
🔥416.0%
28.00%
👏28.00%
14.00%
❤‍🔥14.00%
🤯14.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 14:14 UTC308 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🎉Yay, Finally)))🎉 Now, I am an #official_vibe_coder, LOL 👨‍💻 Just yesterday, I passed the exam. It was more difficult than what I prepared for, but alhamdulillah, still did it. If there’s anyone getting prepared for it, let me know, I got some tips P.S: It’s currently one of the most prestigious AI certificates available. It’s not a simple one-click/free exam. And it tests more than just chatbot AI knowledge 😁 @

🔥3👏21

Signed Javohir Mirzakhalov

22 Jul 2026, 06:07 UTC66 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @JM_personalblog

Posted without readable text

Signed Javohir Mirzakhalov

21 Jul 2026, 12:24 UTC86 viewsread 10 August 2026

LLMs are crazy in how they are built/designed Tons of things lay behind Everytime I learn what's under the hood, I feel soo dumb

Signed Javohir Mirzakhalov

21 Jul 2026, 12:20 UTC77 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

That's the pipeline through which our requests flow in Claude if we are using any tool or mcp servers

Signed Javohir Mirzakhalov

14 Jul 2026, 11:37 UTC455 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🔗 quizflow.uz 🔗 Bugun ishda shu ohirgi oylarda qilib kelayotgan loyihamizni tugatib, topshirdik. Kirib ishlatib ko'rsangiz bo'ladi Quizflow AI - istalgan fayllaringizdan quiz yaratib beruvchi platforma. Biror imtixonga tayyorlanyapsizmi? Kitob bo'yicha test ishlamoqchimisiz? 10 sekunda tayyor quiz yaratib oling P.S: Aynan shu 1-2 oy ichida ishlatib olishinigiz mumkin. Chunki hozir kuchli AI modellarni ham tekinga

2👍2🔥1

Signed Javohir Mirzakhalov

2 Jul 2026, 13:16 UTC135 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

6 kun sessionni yopmasdan faqat /clear qilib ishlatib yurgan edim. Cost uje $40 urgan bo'larkan api-based bo'lganda

🤯1

Signed Javohir Mirzakhalov

22 Jun 2026, 07:19 UTC182 viewsread 10 August 2026

Bugun negadir ishxonada internet shunchalik sekin ishlayaptikiii...(((( Tezligini tekshirish uchun fast.com ga kirmoqchi edim, o'sha saytni ham ocholmadi, LoL

Signed Javohir Mirzakhalov

16 Jun 2026, 14:15 UTC213 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

O'zi negadir ohirgi paytlar Opus ham juda tez token yeb qo'yapkandek. Anthropicdagilar "token tarozidan" urib qolishmayaptimikin?😁

😁2

Signed Javohir Mirzakhalov

16 Jun 2026, 14:13 UTC198 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

😭😭😭 Ish eng qizigan payti shunday qiladida shuyam Bugun ikki marta limitni hit qilibman, lol Quldek ishlatyapman shekilli Claudeni, XDXD

Signed Javohir Mirzakhalov

12 Jun 2026, 12:15 UTC187 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Bir bug tarixi Bugun loyihada qiziq case bo'ldi. Bitta kichkina bug chiqib turgan edi, 2-3 xaftadan beri to'g'rilamayotgan edik, chunki juda oddiy va asosiy flowga halaqit bermaydigan bug edi. Bugun shuni ham qo'shib to'g'rilavoray deb ozgina o'tirgan edim, o'ylab qarasam bu bug emas, feature bo'lib chiqdi 😅 Case: Quiz yaratish modalida, quiz_title required edi. Lekin AI contentga qarab quiz yaratotganda, quiz uchu

😁1

Signed Javohir Mirzakhalov

10 Jun 2026, 08:15 UTC127 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Anthropic yangi modelini chiqaribti - Fable 5 Aytishlaricha Mythos dek kuchli ekan reasoning bo'yicha Va June 22gacha barcha paid planlarda ishlar ekan, keyin credit by usage ga o'tar ekan. Shunga ishlatib olinglar Lekin juda ham token-expensive ekan. O'zi Opus 2x of Sonnet edi. Endi bu Fable 2x of Opus tokens ekan Atigi 2dona kichik savollar berdim, va uje 27% usageimni yeb qoydi 5-hour limitdan

👍4

Signed Javohir Mirzakhalov

12 May 2026, 14:08 UTC189 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Claude Codega 20$ to'laganimga rozi bo'lib ketdimee, shu ishimni o'xshatib berolgani uchun😁

😁1

Signed Javohir Mirzakhalov

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @code_insights. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 268,807 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Code Insights🎗” (@code_insights), 61 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/code_insights.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.