Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Code Gap

Channel

Code Gap

@codegaporg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

205subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001587930266
TypeChannel
Username@codegaporg
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/codegaporg

Growth

2052092078 August 2026 — 209 subscribers8 August 2026 — 209 subscribers23 August 2026 — 207 subscribers31 August 2026 — 205 subscribers8 August 202631 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 24 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 204–210 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 18:43205-2
23 Aug 2026, 22:07207-2
8 Aug 2026, 11:03209no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:01209first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

80 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6480.0%
🔥911.3%
👎45.00%
💔22.50%
11.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2025 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jun 2026, 09:48 UTC282 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

یه سوال دوستان جلسات کد میت ادامه دار باشن؟ تا شرایط برگشت جلسات اصلی کدگپ رو نداریم حداقل بتونیم یه جا جمع بشیم به بهونه های مختلف؟ با ری اکشن نشون بدید

👍21👎2🔥1

Signed Ali Mohammadi

1 Jun 2026, 16:46 UTC363 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

جهت اینکه ثبت نامتون حتمی باشه و بدونیم که قراره حضور داشته باشین به آی دی زیر پیام بدین @CodeGapAdmin ظرفیت خیلی کمه

👍2

Signed Code Gap Admin پشتیبانی رویداد کدگپ

1 Jun 2026, 16:45 UTC344 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

☕️ جلسه دوم Code Meet - وقتی هنوز کنار هم هستیم بعضی روزها بیشتر از هر چیزی، به چند ساعت گفت‌وگوی خوب، چند آدم هم‌فکر و یک فنجان قهوه نیاز داریم. جلسه دوم Code Meet قراره بهانه‌ای باشه برای اینکه بعد از روزهای سخت و فرساینده، دوباره دور هم جمع بشیم؛ نه برای فرار از واقعیت، بلکه برای یادآوری اینکه هنوز می‌شه ساخت، یاد گرفت، حرف زد و امیدوار موند. اینجا خبری از ارائه‌های رسمی و برنامه‌های پیچیده نیست. مثل همیشه دور

🔥2

Signed Code Gap Admin پشتیبانی رویداد کدگپ

29 May 2026, 13:26 UTC387 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

دوستان دلتون میخواد یک رویداد خودمونی در این ماه داشته باشیم تا همدیگر رو ببینم فارغ از استرس و مشکلات این دوران؟ با ری اکشن نشون بدید تا برنامه بچینیم براش

👍22👎2

Signed Ali Mohammadi

21 Sept 2025, 04:45 UTC≈1,360 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔥 جلسه بیست و سوم کد گپ این هفته سه شنبه است! منتظرتونیم. 😉 📍 آدرس: تبریز، بلوار استاد شهریار، نبش سربالایی ولی عصر، مجتمع فرهنگی 22 بهمن تبریز ( سینما ناجی )، طبقه زیر زمین ، سالن ۲ ( استاد فاسونکی ) 🗓 تاریخ: سه‌شنبه ۱ مهر ۱۴۰۴ 🕖 ساعت: ۶:۰۰ بعد از ظهر اسپانسر جلسه ۲۳ ام: QCODE لینک ثبت نام https://codegap.ir/events/codegap23 کانال تلگرام Https://t.me/CodeGapOrg هرگونه مشکلی توی ثبت نام داشتید به ادمین پیام ب

💔2

Signed Ali Mohammadi

22 Jul 2025, 18:59 UTC436 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ایونت فردا ساعت ۶ و نیم تا ۸ و نیم هست دوستان ثبت نام کاملا رایگان و سفارش هم مثل کدگپ های سال قبل 🙏🏻 ظرفیت تمام شد!

👍3

Signed Ali Mohammadi

22 Jul 2025, 10:20 UTC656 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎉 جلسه اول Code Meet - یه دورهمی واقعی برای کدنویس‌ها! ما قراره توی Code Meet با یه حال خوب شروع کنیم؛ نه خبری از سخنرانی‌های خشک و رسمی هست، نه کسی می‌خواد جلوت درس پس بده. اینجا فقط آدمایی دور هم جمع می‌شن که عاشق برنامه‌نویسی‌ان و دلشون می‌خواد با بقیه‌ی هم‌فکراشون آشنا بشن. 🧩‌ جلسه اولمون یه آشنایی خودمونی‌ـه با طعم قهوه و کلی حرف حساب. می‌خوایم بشناسیمت، بشناسیمون، و با هم شبکه‌سازی واقعی کنیم — بدون لباس رسمی

👍2

Signed Ali Mohammadi

17 Jul 2025, 15:39 UTC485 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

دوستان لطفا به این نظرسنجی جواب بدید البته اگر توی پیج اینستاگرام جواب دادید نیازی نیست اینجا هم جواب داده بشه 🙏🏻

👍1

Signed Ali Mohammadi

17 Jul 2025, 15:38 UTC470 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

لوکیشن دو جلسه قبلی کدگپ بنظرتون چطور بود؟

  1. خوب56%
  2. متوسط30%
  3. بد14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍1

Signed Ali Mohammadi

10 Jun 2025, 14:23 UTC436 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

لوکیشن جلسه ۲۲ ( ورودی مجتمع )

👍1

Signed Ali Mohammadi

10 Jun 2025, 14:23 UTC449 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Location

Location, posted without a caption

👍1

Signed Ali Mohammadi

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @codegaporg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Jul 2025, 15:38 UTCAnonymous Poll43 voters

لوکیشن دو جلسه قبلی کدگپ بنظرتون چطور بود؟

  1. خوب56%
  2. متوسط30%
  3. بد14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2025 to 17 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Code Gap” (@codegaporg), 205 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/codegaporg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.