Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CoinCraddle Exchange

Channel

CoinCraddle Exchange

@coincraddle_en

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

61subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001485386752
TypeChannel
Username@coincraddle_en
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/coincraddle_en

Growth

616462.56 August 2026 — 63 subscribers10 August 2026 — 63 subscribers12 August 2026 — 64 subscribers1 September 2026 — 63 subscribers10 September 2026 — 62 subscribers19 September 2026 — 61 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 44 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61–64 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 09:5761-1
10 Sept 2026, 18:5862-1
1 Sept 2026, 13:5563-1
12 Aug 2026, 21:5764+1
10 Aug 2026, 03:1663no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:3663first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 27 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
50s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

56 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1832.1%
🔥1832.1%
❤1221.4%
😱58.93%
😢11.79%
🤔11.79%
🤯11.79%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC5 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

😲 The volume of futures on CEX has fallen to its lowest level since December 2023. Website | TG | X | Medium

👍1🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC129 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Smart money is accumulating through this downturn while retail continues to exit. 🥇 Bitcoin whale holdings advanced to roughly 3.06 million coins across 2026, steadily adding as the price slipped under the $60K mark. 🔷 Ethereum reveals a sharp divergence: wallets holding 10k+ ETH sit at all-time highs, yet smaller addresses keep selling into the weakness. 🥇 Bitcoin and XRP hover close to their realized prices, whe…

👍2🔥1

29 May 2026, 11:10 UTC73 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🥇 With over 94% of BTC already mined, Bitcoin’s scarcity is becoming clearer with each cycle. What was once theory is now one of its strongest fundamentals. 🔗 Website | TG | X | Medium

👍1🔥1🤔1

28 May 2026, 08:34 UTC58 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🏦 You won't need banks anymore Here are ALL the crypto neobanks that let you on-ramp, off-ramp, and spend your crypto 👆 ...and CoinCraddle, of course, is with you 24/7 🔗 Website | TG | X | Medium

❤1👍1🔥1

25 May 2026, 08:52 UTC47 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Satoshi Strategy BlackRock Coinbase Nation states ETFs The biggest players in the world are fighting over a fixed supply asset with only ~967k BTC left to mine 🔗 Website | TG | X | Medium

❤1👍1🔥1

22 May 2026, 08:33 UTC42 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

🍕 The Most Expensive Pizzas in History Exactly 16 years ago, Laszlo Hanyecz made history by paying for two pizzas with BTC. He spent 10,000 BTC, which was worth just $25 at the time. Today, this legendary snack is valued at an astronomical $774 million. This isn't just the most expensive fast food on the planet; it's a monumental milestone - the first-ever successful real-world test of Bitcoin. 🔗 Website | TG | X…

❤1👍1🔥1

21 May 2026, 12:11 UTC34 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🚀 RWA 2026 Since the revival of RWAs in 2024, progress in regulatory clarity has enabled major TradFi institutional players to dip their toes in. As early experiments paved the way by turning into best practices and playbooks, the pace of tokenization has noticeably accelerated. 🗓 2025 has proven to be a watershed year for RWAs. For both crypto-native and traditional players, competition within the RWA and tokeniza…

❤1👍1🔥1

18 May 2026, 17:19 UTC27 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🥇 BlackRock or Strategy? Which company holds the most BTC? Today, Strategy surged ahead again. Strategy has acquired 24,869 BTC for ~$2.01 billion at ~$80,985 per bitcoin and has achieved BTC Yield of 12.6% YTD 2026. As of 5/17/2026, we hodl 843,738 BTC acquired for ~$63.87 billion at ~$75,700 per bitcoin. 🔗 Website | TG | X | Medium

👍1🔥1🤯1

15 May 2026, 09:09 UTC25 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🥈 JPMorgan warns that ETH and altcoins could continue underperforming Bitcoin without meaningful improvements in network activity, DeFi, and real world applications. 🔗 Website | TG | X | Medium

👍1🔥1😱1

13 May 2026, 10:59 UTC21 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🔎 Crypto markets continue to attract massive inflows Crypto funds posted +$858 million in inflows last week, the 6th consecutive weekly intake. Over this period, investors poured a total of +$4.7 billion into these funds. Crypto funds have now seen inflows in 10 of the last 11 weeks. 🥇 Bitcoin led last week’s inflows at +$706 million, bringing the year-to-date total to +$4.9 billion. ➡️ Ethereum, Solana, and XRP …

❤1👍1🔥1

11 May 2026, 12:06 UTC16 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

What is driving the recent +50% surge in SUI? Price Movement: Base level $0.92 → Peak $1.39 (May 10) → Current price $1.26. Trading Volume: Skyrocketed from $213M to $2.5B. 📌 Key Trigger The primary driver was an event on May 10: SUI Group Holdings (NASDAQ: SUIG) moved its entire reserve of 108.7 million SUI from DeFi protocols directly into staking. This move effectively removed approximately 2.7% of the total s…

👍1🔥1😱1

8 May 2026, 09:59 UTC15 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🔎 $0.03T in Tokenized Assets vs $288T in Real Estate We're not early. We're basically pre conception. 🔗 Website | TG | X | Medium

❤1👍1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @coincraddle_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CoinCraddle Exchange” (@coincraddle_en), 61 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coincraddle_en.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.