Channel
@coinflip_fpl
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
348subscribers
+14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002226506494 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @coinflip_fpl |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/coinflip_fpl |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:55 | 348 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:29 | 349 | +7 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 342 | +6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:54 | 336 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 334 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:12 | 334 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 15 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
144 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 76 | 52.8% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 20.8% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 8.33% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 4.17% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 3.47% | |
| custom 5280579470577640874 | 4 | 2.78% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 2.08% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 2.08% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 1.39% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 1.39% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.694% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вратари за £4.5 Как говорится, вратарь - половина команды. Поэтому начнём именно с них. Играющих вратарей за £4.0 нам не завезли, а 🇬🇧Leno после предыдущего провального сезона и непонятной ситуации в команде не вижу смысла рассматривать. 🇬🇧Verbruggen Брайтон в прошлом сезоне неожиданно стал четвёртым клубом в АПЛ по xGA с показателем 53.75. Это уже достаточный аргумент за то чтобы считать его подарком за такую …
👍12❤1
Первый осмысленный состав в новом сезоне. Мнения?
👍7👎3🤔1
Потихоньку начинаем заходить в новый сезон. Обновил шапку канала результатами прошлого: FPL: 492595 (~4% лучших игроков) FCL: 832 (~0.1% лучших игроков) FWC: 51015 (~2.5% лучших игроков)
🔥12
Сделали такие цены, что Холланд будет у всех даже за рекордные £15.5
👍7😁2
Posted without readable text
Последний турнир сезона завершен. Всех болельщиков Испании с заслуженной победой!
👍2🔥2
Если что, у меня 6 общих с этим составом. Но приятно, что ИИ наконец выдает что-то похожее на играбельный состав. (Год назад было значительно хуже) Как вы используете ИИ при игре в фэнтези?
💯5
Итогов сезона ФПЛ пока нет. Зато вот такой состав выдала ИИшка на Фэнтези ЧМ. Мнения?👋
🔥7😁1
🧤 Вратари · Камило Варгас (Колумбия) — $4.3M: Основной вратарь сборной Колумбии и один из главных творцов её недавних успехов. · Барт Вербрюгген (Нидерланды) — $4.8M: Является первым номером сборной Нидерландов на турнире, а его команда традиционно сильна в обороне. 🛡️ Защитники · Даниэль Муньос (Колумбия) — $4.6M: Ярко выраженный атакующий крайний защитник, который постоянно подключается вперёд и создаёт моменты.…
👍11
Вот теперь сезон закончен😎
🔥8
Ура, наконец-то мой любимый фэнтези со Скаутинг Бонусом! https://play.fifa.com/fantasy
😁5👍2
Заканчиваю сезон в топ-500к, камбэк вышел неплохой, прямо из шестого миллиона👋 Выложу обзор сезона, как и в прошлый раз. А пока готовимся к Фэнтези ЧМ💐
👍7😁3
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @coinflip_fpl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Коинфлип | FPL” (@coinflip_fpl), 348 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coinflip_fpl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.