Adult β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 58 days, net +4,148. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 87,152β92,554 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Oct 2026, 00:18
91,931
+2,351
28 Sept 2026, 01:57
89,580
+1,340
17 Sept 2026, 19:56
88,240
-83
15 Sept 2026, 13:56
88,323
-4
13 Sept 2026, 23:39
88,327
+66
12 Sept 2026, 05:19
88,261
-8
9 Sept 2026, 21:35
88,269
+82
6 Sept 2026, 12:21
88,187
+114
4 Sept 2026, 01:59
88,073
+75
2 Sept 2026, 12:54
87,998
-38
1 Sept 2026, 11:04
88,036
-3
31 Aug 2026, 09:16
88,039
-25
30 Aug 2026, 11:05
88,064
-26
29 Aug 2026, 10:07
88,090
-36
28 Aug 2026, 07:34
88,126
+38
27 Aug 2026, 11:04
88,088
-57
26 Aug 2026, 07:33
88,145
+15
25 Aug 2026, 10:43
88,130
+14
24 Aug 2026, 10:55
88,116
+66
22 Aug 2026, 17:44
88,050
first reading
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 11 March 2025 β the reader has reached the start of this channelβs public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 124 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
1
Videos
2
Links
3
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 7 October 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
16s
Average length
8s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Reaction mix
1,773 reactions across 3 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
β€
1,154
65.1%
π₯
241
13.6%
π
107
6.03%
π₯°
76
4.29%
π
67
3.78%
π
39
2.20%
π
33
1.86%
πΎ
24
1.35%
π
14
0.79%
π
6
0.338%
β
5
0.282%
π
4
0.226%
π
3
0.169%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 1,773 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2025 to 8 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @colegialass69. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@colegialass69 edited 2 posts after it first published β the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too β this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
4 October 2026
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channelβs posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@colegialass69 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant β a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@caseros_xvideo_colegialas named in 6 posts, 8 August 2026 β 22 August 2026 Β· confirmed gone 17 September 2026 (two independent sightings β see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ€ COLEGIALAS π§‘ 18+β (@colegialass69), 91,931 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/colegialass69.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.