Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Collectif VF

Channel

Collectif VF

@collectifvf

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,861subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002040011253
TypeChannel
Username@collectifvf
Created21 February 2024measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/collectifvf

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,8601,8721,8666 August 2026 — 1,872 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,872 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,871 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,868 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,869 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,868 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,867 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,866 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,865 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,861 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,860 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,861 subscribers1,8616 August 202618 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 43 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,858–1,874 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 17:221,861+1
14 Sept 2026, 08:191,860-1
10 Sept 2026, 16:371,861-4
5 Sept 2026, 17:011,865-1
1 Sept 2026, 20:491,866-1
29 Aug 2026, 11:481,867-1
26 Aug 2026, 16:431,868-1
23 Aug 2026, 16:451,869+1
13 Aug 2026, 05:231,868-3
9 Aug 2026, 20:111,871-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:311,872no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:471,872first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 17 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
18m 15s
Average length
2m 17s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

373 reactions across 21 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏12633.8%
👍8823.6%
4512.1%
🤡308.04%
💯256.70%
🔥236.17%
🤬184.83%
🤮82.14%
🤯61.61%
😡10.268%
🤔10.268%
🤣10.268%
🤩10.268%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 373 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC216 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @vivre_sainement_reel

Pendant que tout le monde regarde un clash à la télé... Donald Trump démonte le système financier mondial en silence. Vidéo ici : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzJy3z7aQ-U

👏9👍4🤡3

4 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC257 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @vivre_sainement_reel

Trump, Iran, Hamas : le Hamas a accepté de désarmer, et l'Iran s'effondre. Ce n'est pas un hasard, c'est un plan. Vidéo ici : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgjN8ossCR4

👍13🤡7👏3🤬1

4 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC306 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ledeclencheurVideo

Le sénateur Bernie Moreno s'en prend violemment à Anthony Fauci lors de son audition au Sénat du 29 juillet 2026. Il lui donne une chance de s'excuser pour toutes les personnes qu’il a blessées avec ses confinements, ses obligations vaccinales et de port du masque. «Mais pour qui vous prenez-vous, bordel… Ce n’est un secret pour personne les raisons pour lesquelles vous avez dû engager l’avocat le plus crapuleux de t

👏193🔥2🤡1

28 Jul 2026, 15:32 UTC438 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @vivre_sainement_reel

On parle enfin de LA bombe nucléaire que Trump gardait secrète. Spoiler : elle ne va tuer personne, et va libérer le monde. Vidéo ici : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qaTfP118RLI

👏65🤡3

25 Jul 2026, 19:20 UTC521 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @quadrillagetraductionVideo

ELON MUSK: "Ce que VOUS appelez extrême droite, ce ne sont que des gens normaux. Que des gens normaux. Voici les principes, dites-moi lesquels d'entre eux vous semblent terribles ? Que nous devrions avoir des frontières sécurisées ? Que nous devrions avoir des villes sûres ? Que nous devrions avoir des dépenses raisonnables ? Lequel de ces trois principes relève de l'extrême droite ? "

💯15👏121🔥1🤡1🤮1

23 Jul 2026, 15:32 UTC646 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @vivre_sainement_reel

Donald Trump impose des taxes. Le Canada riposte. Sauf que le vrai combat n'a rien à voir avec le commerce. Vidéo ici : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTual8ANGf4

🤡4👏2

22 Jul 2026, 15:33 UTC549 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @vivre_sainement_reel

Pendant que l'Europe s'effondre, Trump, Poutine et Erdogan préparent quelque chose de bien plus grand. Vidéo ici : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=azZwWbvO8lU

👍9👏21🤡1

8 Jul 2026, 15:13 UTC854 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @vivre_sainement_reel

Les nazis appelaient l’euthanasie un "traitement". La France de 2026 appelle ça un "soin". Le parallèle avec les nazis est encore plus proche que vous ne le pensez. Vidéo ici : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZpnNb0xkk_A

👏11👍5💯1🤔1

2 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC863 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @vivre_sainement_reel

Le diabète de type 2 touche 589 millions de personnes. On vous dit que c'est irréversible. 3 essais cliniques prouvent le contraire. Vidéo ici : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRSkxtYsGlg

9👍5👏2

30 Jun 2026, 15:09 UTC822 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @vivre_sainement_reel

Ils ont lancé une énorme campagne de vaccination méningite à Bergame quelques semaines avant l'explosion massive des morts. Coïncidence ? Vidéo ici : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfI5_wIiegk

🤬8💯2

25 Jun 2026, 15:06 UTC890 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @vivre_sainement_reelPhoto

850 millions de dollars pour un bâtiment sans archives. Obama ne cache pas l'histoire, il la réécrit. Vidéo ici : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVjS4iTfkOU

👍4🔥4🤯41🤮1😡1

24 Jun 2026, 15:04 UTC741 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @vivre_sainement_reelPhoto

Scott Ritter revient du front en Ukraine et brise le silence. C’est l’ancien inspecteur en désarmement des Nations Unies qui avait eu raison avant tout le monde sur l'absence d'armes de destruction massive en Irak. Vidéo ici : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gQOGx9tvg0

👏87👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @collectifvf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Radio-Québec
@radio_quebec · 41,932
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Collectif VF” (@collectifvf), 1,861 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/collectifvf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.