Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Combat Footage

Channel

Combat Footage

@combat_ftg2

Not marked by Telegram, checked 12 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

48,714subscribers

+570 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002209028079
TypeChannel
Username@combat_ftg2
Descriptioncontact: @antonsokolenko [email protected] To support the channel PayPal - [email protected] Footage with no censorship - t.me/combat_ftg How to access it - Check pinned message ———————————————— chat: https://t.me/+ci2njIB0BUM0ZDZi
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 October 2026
Measurements held45
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/combat_ftg2

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

48,14448,71748,430.57 August 2026 — 48,144 subscribers8 August 2026 — 48,158 subscribers9 August 2026 — 48,182 subscribers10 August 2026 — 48,185 subscribers11 August 2026 — 48,195 subscribers12 August 2026 — 48,213 subscribers13 August 2026 — 48,219 subscribers14 August 2026 — 48,229 subscribers16 August 2026 — 48,240 subscribers17 August 2026 — 48,257 subscribers18 August 2026 — 48,259 subscribers19 August 2026 — 48,261 subscribers20 August 2026 — 48,251 subscribers21 August 2026 — 48,248 subscribers22 August 2026 — 48,258 subscribers24 August 2026 — 48,249 subscribers25 August 2026 — 48,265 subscribers27 August 2026 — 48,276 subscribers28 August 2026 — 48,279 subscribers29 August 2026 — 48,274 subscribers30 August 2026 — 48,287 subscribers31 August 2026 — 48,277 subscribers1 September 2026 — 48,278 subscribers2 September 2026 — 48,285 subscribers3 September 2026 — 48,292 subscribers5 September 2026 — 48,278 subscribers9 September 2026 — 48,270 subscribers11 September 2026 — 48,251 subscribers13 September 2026 — 48,265 subscribers15 September 2026 — 48,234 subscribers17 September 2026 — 48,240 subscribers25 September 2026 — 48,364 subscribers3 October 2026 — 48,442 subscribers8 October 2026 — 48,473 subscribers12 October 2026 — 48,533 subscribers14 October 2026 — 48,555 subscribers15 October 2026 — 48,558 subscribers17 October 2026 — 48,568 subscribers18 October 2026 — 48,574 subscribers19 October 2026 — 48,575 subscribers20 October 2026 — 48,603 subscribers21 October 2026 — 48,677 subscribers22 October 2026 — 48,695 subscribers23 October 2026 — 48,717 subscribers24 October 2026 — 48,714 subscribers48,7147 August 202624 October 2026
45 measurements spanning 78 days, net +570. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48,058–48,803 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 45
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Oct 2026, 14:0048,714-3
23 Oct 2026, 16:2548,717+22
22 Oct 2026, 14:3948,695+18
21 Oct 2026, 06:2048,677+74
20 Oct 2026, 05:3748,603+28
19 Oct 2026, 05:2948,575+1
18 Oct 2026, 08:1048,574+6
17 Oct 2026, 10:3048,568+10
15 Oct 2026, 12:0748,558+3
14 Oct 2026, 10:4048,555+22
12 Oct 2026, 19:3848,533+60
8 Oct 2026, 09:2048,473+31
3 Oct 2026, 22:3948,442+78
25 Sept 2026, 01:5748,364+124
17 Sept 2026, 03:3648,240+6
15 Sept 2026, 00:5848,234-31
13 Sept 2026, 11:3848,265+14
11 Sept 2026, 17:3648,251-19
9 Sept 2026, 03:3948,270-8
5 Sept 2026, 20:0148,278first reading

Engagement

86 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 159 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.7%
avg views ÷ 48,714 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,600
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 86 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 October 2026
Posts held86 (9 July 2026 – 24 October 2026)
Views total358,390
Reactions total6,928
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Oct 2026, 02:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈483
Videos
≈3,080
Links
≈39

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 11m
Average length
52s

Measured directly from 82 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

21,577 reactions across 86 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7,11733.0%
❤4,53821.0%
🤣3,72317.3%
👍2,99213.9%
😁1,2415.75%
🤬1,1795.46%
🤡4111.90%
👎1890.876%
😐1870.867%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 86 of the 86 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21,577 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 24 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
34
across the posts below
Posts paid on
24
of 86 we hold a reading for · 28%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @combat_ftg2. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 86 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 24 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Oct 2026, 13:55 UTC≈2,730 views134 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Video

A Ukrainian UGV drops an improvised 140kg bomb to collapse an emergence hole the ruzky were using vil an underground pipeline

🔥106❤12🤣10👍5🤡1

24 Oct 2026, 08:21 UTC≈3,380 views156 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Video

High precision strike of Ukrainian Storm Shadow missiles hitting the Proton factory in Oryol, Russia.

🔥115👍25❤14🤣1😁1

24 Oct 2026, 08:21 UTC≈3,330 views119 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

Starlink is once again working reliably at speeds of over 400 km/h. The connection remains stable, Ukraine’s Defense Minister Khmara says.

🔥67👍40😐6❤4🤬2

23 Oct 2026, 21:15 UTC≈4,200 views117 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Video

A ruzky invader managed to shoot an FPV but that didn't save him

🔥67😁21👍15🤣8❤6

21 Oct 2026, 03:48 UTC≈7,790 views223 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Video

Ukrainian SOF unit "Group 10" eliminated and captured several Russian soldiers in the Sumy direction Episodes from a seven-week operation by Ukrainian intelligence operatives from “Group 10” in the Sumy region, which resulted in 108 Russian servicemen being killed and 29 captured.

❤117👍61🔥39🤬4🤣2

20 Oct 2026, 15:25 UTC≈8,330 views261 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Video

Footage of a Ukrainian waiter drone employing the new TCPS (Tactical Cat Perimeter System) to warn of incoming targets

❤184🔥37👍21😁14🤡5

19 Oct 2026, 19:16 UTC≈8,630 views98 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Video

A Russian guided aerial bomb (KAB) ricocheted off the edge of a multi-story residential building in Sumy.

😁55🤣21❤11😐6🤬5

19 Oct 2026, 18:50 UTC≈7,660 views270 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Video

Ukraine’s Defense Forces have reportedly carried out the world’s first aerial drone evacuation of a wounded soldier from the front line. A soldier from the 30th Mechanized Brigade was wounded at his position. Due to the high density of enemy drones and extensive mining, evacuation by ground robotic system was impossible. Fighters from the 92nd Assault Brigade’s ground robotic systems company came up with an unconve…

❤197👍66🔥6🤡1

19 Oct 2026, 09:19 UTC≈7,550 views247 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Video

A Ukrainian heavy bomber drone on the Sumy front line noticed an exit point from a pipeline the ruzky were using to infiltrate Ukrainian territory. Initially, ammunition without detonators were dropped inside, accumulating explosives, and as a final touch, a TM-62 mine was dropped, causing a massive explosion that collapsed the passage.

🔥164❤44👍35🤣2😐2

18 Oct 2026, 20:36 UTC≈7,710 views171 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Video

Ukrainian Air Defence Battalion “Aliens” of the 115th Mechanised Brigade hit two russian combat helicopters

🔥129👍20❤14😁8

18 Oct 2026, 06:29 UTC≈8,700 views149 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣127❤14👍8

17 Oct 2026, 14:09 UTC≈9,380 views168 reactions1 Starread 25 October 2026
Video

Footage of a russian glide bomb hitting an apartment building in Sumy but luckily failing to detonate and just ricocheting off of it

👍118🤣27❤15😐8

Showing the 12 most recent of 86 posts we hold for @combat_ftg2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@combat_ftg2 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
24 October 2026
Most recent edit
24 October 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Jul 2026, 19:43 UTCAnonymous Poll3,040 voters approx.

Is this a real video recording or an AI generated fake?

  1. Real71%
  2. AI29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 24 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Denys Davydov
@pilotblog · 191,975
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
DamnedHistory⚡️
@Damhistory · 21,014
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Combat Footage” (@combat_ftg2), 48,714 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/combat_ftg2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.