Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,587–11,631 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 01:59
11,603
+5
15 Sept 2026, 22:19
11,598
+3
14 Sept 2026, 06:00
11,595
-8
12 Sept 2026, 14:20
11,603
-3
10 Sept 2026, 13:59
11,606
+1
7 Sept 2026, 06:54
11,605
-3
4 Sept 2026, 15:16
11,608
+1
3 Sept 2026, 02:04
11,607
+3
2 Sept 2026, 02:12
11,604
+1
1 Sept 2026, 01:38
11,603
-1
31 Aug 2026, 01:14
11,604
-12
29 Aug 2026, 23:34
11,616
-4
28 Aug 2026, 20:04
11,620
-5
27 Aug 2026, 19:23
11,625
-1
26 Aug 2026, 21:03
11,626
+11
25 Aug 2026, 22:02
11,615
+2
25 Aug 2026, 00:45
11,613
-3
23 Aug 2026, 16:14
11,616
-3
22 Aug 2026, 01:09
11,619
-7
20 Aug 2026, 17:53
11,626
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.9%
avg views ÷ 11,603 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,960
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
24 (3 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
15,652
Reactions total
499
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 01:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,467 reactions across 24 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,052
71.7%
custom 5238199482079799546
78
5.32%
🦄
78
5.32%
✍
45
3.07%
🕊
43
2.93%
👍
39
2.66%
💔
33
2.25%
🎉
28
1.91%
🤩
26
1.77%
💘
9
0.613%
👎
6
0.409%
💅
5
0.341%
😢
5
0.341%
👏
3
0.204%
💋
3
0.204%
🤔
3
0.204%
🤨
3
0.204%
😭
2
0.136%
🤯
2
0.136%
💯
1
0.068%
3 further kinds
3
0.204%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,467 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 24 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @comingoutspb. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
«Выход» ищет новых волонтёр_ок!
«Волонтёрство — одна из самых важных вещей в моей жизни. Оно помогает мне не терять связь с российским ЛГБТК+ сообществом в эмиграции, чувствовать себя частью значимой цели. Я вижу, что наши усилия дают плоды».
Л., волонтёрка «Выхода» с 2022 года
Если вы находитесь за пределами России и Беларуси, но хотите помогать ЛГБТК+ людям в этих странах — приходите волонтёрить в «Выход».
У нас…
📱 Подписки, чаты и взаимопомощь: разбираем правила безопасности для транс-людей
В юридическую службу «Выхода» регулярно приходят вопросы от транс*персон о том, насколько безопасно писать в соцсетях о своём опыте, состоять в транс*чатах и даже просто представляться своими местоимениями. Рассказываем, как сейчас обстоят дела:
Что остаётся в рамках закона:
💬 Личные переписки: в них можно писать о своей гендерной идент…
👾 Rain Heart: психологический хоррор от инди-студии Flat Reality
Пиксельная история о подростке, у которого есть школа, любимая рок-группа, подруга и мечта уехать.
Исследуйте внутренний мир Алекса, где страхи принимают форму, а подавленные чувства находят путь наружу. Проходите через знакомые улицы, квартиры, классы и дворы — чтобы увидеть, как личные трагедии переплетаются в одну общую.
Проходите сюжетные эпизоды…
💜 День фиолетового цвета (Wear It Purple Day)
Ежегодно в последнюю пятницу августа по всему миру отмечают Wear It Purple Day — день поддержки и видимости квир-подростков.
Всё началось в Австралии в 2010 году, когда несколько студенто_к решили ответить на волну травли и буллинга, с которой сталкивались их ЛГБТК+ сверстники. Идея была простой: надеть фиолетовую вещь, чтобы без лишних слов показать подросткам, что они…
✍️ Вебинар для журналисто_к, редакторо_к, сотрудни_ц НКО и всех, кто пишет о преследованиях по «ЛГБТ-статьям»
Число дел, связанных с «ЛГБТ-статьями», растёт, а само правоприменение становится всё сложнее. При этом практика показывает, что под преследование попадают не только активист_ки или квир-персоны, но и люди, не имеющие отношения к ЛГБТК+ сообществу. В политически мотивированных делах огласка считается инструм…
🩺 Что сейчас с доступом к медицине для трансгендерных людей?
Хотя законодательство, применяемое в отношении трансгендерных людей в России, создаёт ощущение полной бесправности, всё ещё остаются юридические нормы, на которые можно опираться. Но как они работают на практике? Гарантируют ли законы право на получение базовой и экстренной медицинской помощи? Защищает ли врачебная тайна от разглашения данных?
Доступ к ме…
Каждая история важна. Расскажите, каким каминг-аут был для вас 🌈
Каминг-аут для кого-то становится моментом невероятной свободы и облегчения, а для кого-то — сложным испытанием. Расскажите историю своего каминг-аута. Было ли это 20 лет назад или на прошлой неделе? Публично или только перед самыми близкими? Волновались или праздновали?
Ко Дню каминг-аута собираем личные истории, чтобы показать, каким разным бывает э…
Как (не) надо реагировать на каминг-аут ребёнка
В момент, когда ребёнок совершает каминг-аут, родители могут испытывать разные чувства: шок, тревогу, страх перед неизвестным и даже горевание по прежним ожиданиям.
Главное, о чём стоит помнить: это уязвимый шаг для ребёнка. В этом признании часто много страха отвержения, но ещё больше — любви и желания оставаться честным с семьёй.
Если от неожиданности сложно понять…
3 причины подписаться на email-рассылку «Выхода»:
💌 Материалы, которых нет в соцсетях. Делимся эксклюзивным контентом, который выходит только в рассылке.
💌 Планы и новости «Выхода». Пишем о том, как устроена наша работа, делимся результатами и планами на будущее.
💌 Связь на случай блокировок. Если с Телеграмом что-то случится, пришлём письмо со ссылками на новые площадки.
И главное — присылаем не больше двух писе…
📚 Каково быть ЛГБТК+ учащ_ейся? Поделитесь своим опытом
Школа, колледж или университет должны быть безопасным местом, но, к сожалению, это не всегда так. Международная организация IGLYO проводит исследование LGBTQI School Survey 2026, чтобы зафиксировать, с чем сталкиваются ЛГБТК+ подростки и студенты в процессе учебы.
Зачем проходить этот опрос?
🧑🏫 Чтобы сделать свой голос слышимым: Каждая история помогает сформи…
«Мы — повсюду, и природа это понимает»
Сегодня — Международный день флага трансгендерных людей, символа, который объединяет миллионы людей по всему миру и напоминает о праве быть собой.
Флаг появился в 1999 году благодаря Монике Хелмс. Розовый и голубой цвета символизируют феминность и маскулинность, белая полоса посередине — небинарных людей и тех, кто находится в процессе перехода. Моника рассказывала, вспоминая …
После внесения в реестр экстремистских организаций «Выход» продолжает работу в штатном режиме.
И хотя для изменения нашей работы причин нет, правила безопасности для читател_ьниц и подписчи_ц меняются.
Так как открытое комментирование постов «Выхода» может привлечь внимание правоохранительных органов, мы были вынуждены полностью анонимизировать отправку сообщений в комментариях 💔
Мы очень ждём момента, когда можно…
❤84👍24🕊21🤬1
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @comingoutspb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@comingoutspb edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
21 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Помыла руки @washed_hands · 39,228 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
Парни+ @parniplus_com · 30,276 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 7 September 2026
Лобби @lesbianlobby · 23,064 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Выход | ComingOutSpb” (@comingoutspb), 11,603 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/comingoutspb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.