Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Comitato Ascoltami

Channel

Comitato Ascoltami

@comitatoascoltami

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,938subscribers

-87 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001725196738
TypeChannel
Username@comitatoascoltami
Created30 October 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/comitatoascoltami

Growth

16,93817,02516,981.56 August 2026 — 17,025 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,025 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,023 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,022 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,020 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,018 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,016 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,014 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,010 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,009 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,002 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,997 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,993 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,986 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,984 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,981 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,975 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,971 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,965 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,961 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,959 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,956 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,952 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,946 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,944 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,943 subscribers4 September 2026 — 16,938 subscribers6 August 20264 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 29 days, net -87. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,925–17,038 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 07:3716,938-5
2 Sept 2026, 18:0516,943-1
1 Sept 2026, 17:0616,944-2
31 Aug 2026, 18:1316,946-6
30 Aug 2026, 19:2516,952-4
29 Aug 2026, 16:0216,956-3
28 Aug 2026, 16:3716,959-2
26 Aug 2026, 11:0716,961-4
25 Aug 2026, 07:4416,965-6
24 Aug 2026, 08:2716,971-4
22 Aug 2026, 18:1716,975-6
21 Aug 2026, 10:2516,981-3
20 Aug 2026, 09:5816,984-2
19 Aug 2026, 11:2716,986-7
18 Aug 2026, 12:1516,993-4
17 Aug 2026, 14:2516,997-5
16 Aug 2026, 07:4417,002-7
14 Aug 2026, 20:4717,009-1
13 Aug 2026, 12:5817,010-4
11 Aug 2026, 18:3217,014first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 2 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.7%
avg views ÷ 16,938 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,700
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held23 (2 April 202631 August 2026)
Views total9,390
Reactions total95
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,521 reactions across 23 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
57938.1%
👍51333.7%
🤬15710.3%
👏1137.43%
👎301.97%
🔥271.78%
😢271.78%
💔171.12%
😈140.92%
🙏110.723%
😭100.657%
🏆50.329%
🤯40.263%
😱30.197%
🤷‍♀30.197%
🥰20.131%
🥴20.131%
😡10.066%
🤡10.066%
🤣10.066%
1 further kind10.066%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,521 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC≈5,560 views45 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

L’11 settembre 2026, a Milano, ci sarà un appuntamento importante: “Il Cammino nella Luce” Per onorare. Per non dimenticare. Per ricominciare. Non una semplice manifestazione. Ma un momento di memoria, presenza e testimonianza. 📍 Milano, venerdì 11 settembre 2026 Durante la giornata sarà presente un gazebo informativo in Piazza Duca d’Aosta, presso la Stazione Centrale. Dalle 14:00 alle 17:30, presso il Pirellone

33👍12

15 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTC≈3,830 views50 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

C’è una parola che, in medicina, dovrebbe pesare più di ogni slogan: prudenza. Secondo quanto riportato da Adnkronos, riprendendo il New York Post, alcuni messaggi privati del 2021 attribuiti ad Anthony Fauci mostrerebbero timori interni sul vaccino anti-Covid in gravidanza, in particolare sul possibile rischio teorico di aborto spontaneo nel primo trimestre. 📌 Qui il link al post con fonte e nostro commento: 👉 htt

👍33🔥105👏2

7 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC≈5,470 views108 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Nell’audizione in Commissione Covid, Giuseppe Conte ha parlato di un “patto” tra governo e popolazione. Ma il testo dell’articolo riporta una frase precisa: «La popolazione ha condiviso un patto proposto dal governo accettando di assoggettarsi alle restrizioni». Assoggettarsi. Una parola che pesa. Perché durante la pandemia non ci fu un confronto libero e sereno. Ci furono divieti, paura, multe, chiusure, autocer

👍5916🤬13🔥12👏7🤮1

25 Jul 2026, 14:14 UTC≈6,390 views82 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Bellavite in Commissione Covid: “Non si può dimenticare chi si è fidato e ha subito un danno” Nell’audizione del professor Paolo Bellavite, già docente all’Università di Verona, è stato affrontato uno dei nodi più importanti di tutta la vicenda vaccinale: la conoscenza, la registrazione e il riconoscimento degli eventi avversi. 📌 Qui il link al post con video e nostro commento: 👉 https://www.facebook.com/ComitatoAs

60👍12🏆5👏3🥴2

16 Jul 2026, 10:14 UTC≈6,760 views55 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://lanuovabq.it/it/neuropatia-delle-piccole-fibre-il-male-oscuro-post-vaccino-ignorato

35🤬17😱3

3 Jul 2026, 06:34 UTC≈7,140 views94 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://lanuovabq.it/it/va-bene-conte-ma-draghi-serve-una-svolta-sulle-indagini-in-pandemia

👍67👏18🤬62🤣1

2 Jul 2026, 10:16 UTC≈11,700 views52 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Quando a Genova venne programmata la proiezione del documentario Invisibili, dedicato alle testimonianze dei danneggiati da vaccino, Matteo Bassetti chiese che il Comune non desse l’autorizzazione, parlando di “fake news”. Oggi, in Commissione Covid, gli è stato chiesto conto di quell’episodio. 👉🏻 Qui il link al post con video e nostro commento: https://www.facebook.com/ComitatoAscoltami/posts/pfbid022bCiEXFeU3MaYC

👎2912👍6😈3🥰2

27 Jun 2026, 05:43 UTC≈5,770 views85 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://lanuovabq.it/it/ministero-condannato-verita-a-galla-sui-danni-da-vaccino

👏707😢5👍3

24 Jun 2026, 15:08 UTC≈10,200 views71 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

In Commissione Covid è stato ascoltato Maurizio Federico, dirigente di ricerca presso l’Istituto Superiore di Sanità. Un’audizione importante perché, questa volta, non si è parlato dei danneggiati come di un problema “esterno”, ma di ciò che emerge anche dall’interno della ricerca pubblica italiana. Il passaggio più forte riguarda lo Stato. «Se i danneggiati dai vaccini sono stati 100, sono stati 1000, sono stati

👍4823

24 Jun 2026, 11:14 UTC≈4,470 views50 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @AndreaZambranoNews

L'ISS si è autocensurato per tacere i danni da vaccino - La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana https://lanuovabq.it/it/liss-si-e-autocensurato-per-tacere-i-danni-da-vaccino

32👍16🔥1🤡1

13 Jun 2026, 13:49 UTC≈10,800 views69 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Quando una persona racconta di stare male dopo una vaccinazione, la prima risposta non dovrebbe essere la derisione. Dovrebbe essere l’ascolto. Kikò Nalli, ospite a La Volta Buona, ha raccontato: «A mezzogiorno ho fatto la puntura, alle tre non stavo più in piedi». Ha spiegato di essere finito in sedia a rotelle per due mesi dopo l’ultima dose anti-Covid, precisando anche di avere già problemi di schiena. Secondo

40👍14😭10🤯4🙏1

5 Jun 2026, 14:15 UTC≈12,600 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

In Commissione Covid è stato ascoltato Paolo Vineis, ordinario di Epidemiologia ambientale all’Imperial College di Londra. La sua non è stata un’audizione di rottura: Vineis ha ribadito di ritenere efficaci i vaccini e le misure non farmacologiche. Proprio per questo, però, assumono particolare peso alcuni passaggi critici emersi durante il confronto. 👉🏻 Qui il link al post con video e nostro commento: https://www.

👍20

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @comitatoascoltami. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

IppocrateOrg
@IppocrateOrg · 34,574
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Comitato Ascoltami” (@comitatoascoltami), 16,938 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/comitatoascoltami.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.