26 measurements spanning 28 days, net +1,577. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,584–18,339 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Sept 2026, 02:20
18,021
+73
3 Sept 2026, 06:29
17,948
+43
2 Sept 2026, 04:03
17,905
+166
1 Sept 2026, 00:36
17,739
+495
31 Aug 2026, 01:22
17,244
+95
30 Aug 2026, 03:37
17,149
+531
29 Aug 2026, 01:58
16,618
+486
28 Aug 2026, 05:28
16,132
+230
27 Aug 2026, 02:17
15,902
-30
26 Aug 2026, 05:37
15,932
-33
25 Aug 2026, 04:03
15,965
-43
24 Aug 2026, 00:54
16,008
-54
22 Aug 2026, 10:03
16,062
-49
20 Aug 2026, 21:57
16,111
-10
19 Aug 2026, 21:42
16,121
-28
18 Aug 2026, 20:07
16,149
-42
17 Aug 2026, 19:36
16,191
-55
16 Aug 2026, 15:38
16,246
-63
14 Aug 2026, 20:45
16,309
-27
13 Aug 2026, 11:56
16,336
first reading
Engagement
43 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.2%
avg views ÷ 18,021 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,370
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 43 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
43 (25 June 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
56,933
Reactions total
716
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 08:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
20s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
716 reactions across 24 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
254
35.5%
❤
170
23.7%
🔥
147
20.5%
😭
131
18.3%
👍
14
1.96%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 716 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 43 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @comnotify. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 43 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 June 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇹🇬 NEW: Tonkeeper Goes Multichain-Only for New Wallets
Tonkeeper no longer allows users to create a standalone TON-only wallet. All newly created wallets now support multiple networks by default. You can now manage Ethereum, Bitcoin, BNB, TRON, and other assets directly in Tonkeeper.
🇹🇬 Subscribe: @comnotify
🇹🇬 UPDATE: Gram Wallet in now live on Telegram
Pavel Durov has announced that Gram Wallet is now available to a limited group of users, with access set to gradually roll out to Telegram’s 1B+ users over the next few weeks.
🇹🇬 Subscribe: @comnotify
🇹🇬 BREAKING: Telegram Users Reported Botted Engagement
Several Telegram channel owners have recently noticed an unusual increase in botted reactions on posts, with popular channels appearing to be affected the most. At the same time, multiple private channels are reportedly seeing fake or inactive subscribers being added without any promotion, invites, or other known activity from the admins.
The sudden appearance …
🇹🇬 BREAKING: Entire Blockchain Halted After $75M Hack
A hacker reportedly drained an estimated $75 million from Tectonic, a crypto lending protocol on the Cronos blockchain. The attacker allegedly manipulated Tectonic’s token price by nearly 100×, then used the inflated value as collateral to borrow real assets.
In response, Cronos halted the entire network to prevent further movement of the stolen funds. Reports i…
🇹🇬 UPDATE: Tonkeeper Is Rebranding to Keeper
Tonkeeper is reportedly preparing to rebrand as Keeper and transition into a multi chain wallet, allowing users to manage assets across TON, TRON, Bitcoin, Arbitrum, Base, and more from a single wallet.
However, the wallet’s official name remains Tonkeeper for now. The Keeper branding has only appeared on the official website, tonkeeper.com, and the rebrand has not yet b…
🇹🇬 JUST IN: Telegram Removes Username Limits
Telegram now allows Premium users to link more than 20 usernames to a single account, going beyond the previous 20-username limit.
Previously, you could attach a maximum of 10 usernames.
The change gives Premium users more flexibility to manage multiple identities, communities, and projects from one account.
🇹🇬 Subscribe: @comnotify
🇹🇬 BREAKING: Blackhat Allegedly Linked to a New Wave of X Accounts Being Hacked
The latest wave of X account hacks appears to have possible links to activity surrounding Blackhat ( A GROUP ), where individuals allegedly involved in fraud and account takeovers seem to be communicating and working together.
A post from the username reportedly offered $35,000 in XMR for 2FA removal on X. Around 40 minutes later, the N…
🇹🇬 BREAKING: Pokémon’s Official X Account Hacked
Pokémon’s official X account was reportedly hacked and used to promote a token branded as “$POKEMON.” The post allegedly included a contract address linked to a suspected rug pull, appearing to be part of a crypto scam targeting the account’s followers.
🇹🇬 Subscribe: @comnotify
🇹🇬 BREAKING: Instagram “Secret Reveal” Scam Collects $1M+
Reportedly, an Instagram account named 25 August 2026 gained around 426K followers by teasing a “big secret reveal.” Followers were redirected to Telegram and asked to pay ₹502 (5 USDT) before midnight on August 25. Around 166K people reportedly paid, generating approximately ₹8.03 Crore ($1M+). The account ultimately posted only a basic AI-generated motivati…
Note: No alt accounts. Any account that appears fake or suspicious will be rerolled. If you disagree with these rules, please do not join the giveaway.
🎉 $111 USDT Giveaway 🎉
Hosted By: @cruzz
Requirements:
• Must be a member of @chatzgc
• Must be a member of @comnotify
• Must be a member of @controlfraud
Entries: 265
Giveaway Ends In: 8 Days
To participate in the giveaway, press the button below!
🇹🇬 UPDATE: Meta Reaches $16.68 Billion Settlement
Meta Platforms agreed to pay a maximum $16.68 billion as part of a settlement to resolve claims brought by states across the country that the company designed Facebook and Instagram to addict children, misled consumers about their safety, and improperly collected personal data of children who used its platforms.
The settlement was reached during a California federal…
🔥12❤8🤣7
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @comnotify. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@comnotify edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
3 September 2026
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Notifications” (@comnotify), 18,021 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/comnotify.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.