Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PRO компьютер с Еленой Эйприл

Channel

PRO компьютер с Еленой Эйприл

@complikbez

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

713subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001216581398
TypeChannel
Username@complikbez
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/complikbez

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

71372772012 August 2026 — 726 subscribers12 August 2026 — 726 subscribers19 August 2026 — 727 subscribers25 August 2026 — 725 subscribers1 September 2026 — 718 subscribers11 September 2026 — 713 subscribers12 August 202611 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 30 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 711–729 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 03:55713-5
1 Sept 2026, 13:54718-7
25 Aug 2026, 16:33725-2
19 Aug 2026, 09:07727+1
12 Aug 2026, 09:15726no change
12 Aug 2026, 09:02726first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

321 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍13140.8%
😁7523.4%
🔥4614.3%
🤔175.30%
🤨175.30%
😱123.74%
🌚103.12%
👀92.80%
👏20.623%
🤷‍♀20.623%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 321 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2026 to 3 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @complikbez. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 January 2026 to 3 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Jun 2026, 07:14 UTC229 views14 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

​Схема мошенничества в Telegram С аккаунта, внешне очень похожего на официальный (т.е. с которого приходят служебные уведомления), приходит предупреждение об удалении учётной записи и ссылкой для отмены этого действия. Ссылка, разумеется, фейковая. Чтобы не попасться на уловку, нужно быть внимательным. Например, аккаунт, приславший сообщение, свежий - регистрация 2024 года. Также рекомендую не удалять хотя бы одно

👍11🔥3

28 Apr 2026, 07:14 UTC340 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

​Минцифры ответило пользователям за границей, у которых перестали открываться российские сайты... Спойлер: К сожалению, они по-прежнему могут не работать🤦‍♀️ Полностью ответ на фото, но помимо бестолковых очевидных советов, что делать, если всё равно не работает, министерство решило выдать ещё более дикую вещь: Большинство российских сервисов ограничивают доступ пользователей с включённым VPN. Это делается для безо

😁6🌚5🔥3

25 Apr 2026, 07:14 UTC290 views18 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Такая бешеная конкуренция мессенджеров, что даже не знаю, какой выбрать😒 #честная_конкуренция PRO компьютер

😁18

23 Apr 2026, 13:12 UTC271 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

​Команда RKS Global провела анализ до событий, упомянутых мной в предыдущем посте, и после. Тестировали 30 российских приложений на Android, именно эта операционная система оказалась очень уязвимой к сбору лишней информации установленными приложениями. Пересказывать не буду, вы можете сами ознакомиться со статьёй. Если кратко, то после дедлайна (15 апреля) все собирают и передают данные на свои серверы, и, очевидно,

👍13👀3🔥2

22 Apr 2026, 07:14 UTC207 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Сервисы из белых списков обязаны превращаться в 🎃, когда у вас иностранный IP. Минцифры потребовало от сервисов, входящих в белые списки, прекращать соединение с пользователями, которые используют заграничные IP-адреса (под угрозой исключения из этих списков, вплоть до лишения IT-аккредитации - "Не будут брать, отключим газ!"©). Да, это касается всех, кто использует VPN, а также всех, кто заходит в эти сервисы из-за

🤨8👍6🤷‍♀1

21 Apr 2026, 07:14 UTC204 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026

​Связь будет ещё хуже😳 Не секрет, что интернет-связь внутри России дорожает и ухудшается в силу внешних причин (усложнение приобретения оборудования, его подорожание и пр.). Теперь и коммуникацию во имя суверенного интернета режут на корню: на совещании с главой Минцифры российские операторы подписали мораторий на расширение каналов связи с Европой. Т.е. те кабели, которые нас соединяют будут работать до исчерпания

🤨9🤔5😁2🤷‍♀1

10 Apr 2026, 07:14 UTC309 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

​Итог: Telega признана опасной. То исследование, которое провели многие люди (спасибо им за это), и результаты которого я старалась вместить в размеры обычного поста (получилось целых 3😊), дало закономерные результаты: 🔹 Telegram после последнего обновления помечает потенциально опасные клиенты, созданные на его основе. Telega в их числе. 🔹 App Store удалил это приложение. 🔹 Cloudflare (тот самый, который так мешает

👍13🔥2👏1

31 Mar 2026, 15:18 UTC359 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

​Если вам было недостаточно предыдущих фактов, то продолжим открывать ящик Пандоры Телеги. Часть 3 Теперь о самих чатах, переписках. Классическая схема работы приложения: Пользователь ➡️ серверы Telegram. В Телеге: Пользователь ➡️ серверы Telega/VK ➡️ серверы Telegram. Шифрование Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS) в Telegram реализовано так, что у каждой сессии свои ключи, без которых даже если и скопируешь трафик, он

🔥14👍1

30 Mar 2026, 13:28 UTC218 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

​Нужна ли вам "Телега" или лучше на авто😁 (Продолжение сериала о мессенджере Telega. Часть 2.) Из первого поста мы помним, что разработчики накладывают функции поверх, которые не контролируются Telegram (см. фото). Справедливости ради, такой мелочью в виде обязательной подписки грешат не только форки "Телеграма". Любые прокси делают тоже самое. Но дьявол, конечно, в других деталях: вы никак не контролируете, что вам

🔥9👍4

19 Mar 2026, 07:14 UTC310 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

​Telega - клон, форк или сборка на основе Telegram? Сейчас есть 3 вида нейрокомментариев, которые не отвечают по теме поста, а нацелены на определённую агитацию: продвижение госмессенджера, продвижение Telega, дружба РФ и Китая. И исходя из данного факта ненавязчивого маркетинга можно уже сделать выводы, и на этом закончить статью😁 Но если этого недостаточно, то следующим пунктом предлагаю почитать пользовательское

👍11🤔4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @complikbez. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Импорт и Логистика
@proimporrt · 39,541
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PRO компьютер с Еленой Эйприл” (@complikbez), 713 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/complikbez.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.