Channel
Confusion 9.2.11 OFFICIAL
@confusion9211
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,286subscribers
-46 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001873152203 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @confusion9211 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 4 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/confusion9211 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 09:41 | 4,286 | -1 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 4,287 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 4,288 | -9 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 02:39 | 4,297 | -1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:30 | 4,298 | no change |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:44 | 4,298 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:57 | 4,301 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 4,307 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:11 | 4,309 | -5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 4,314 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 4,316 | -6 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 4,322 | -6 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:38 | 4,328 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 4,331 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:30 | 4,332 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@CivilsNetwork · 74,815
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
@bpscconceptwallah · 50,253
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 August 2026
@gsbyvishnusir · 32,340
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 5 September 2026
@eduteriatestseries · 504,086
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 August 2026
@SKCsirBPSC · 34,805
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 5 September 2026
@iaspcscentre · 38,111
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 31 August 2026
@upacademyforcivilservices · 69,826
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 20 August 2026
@ias_valley · 36,262
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 2 September 2026
@perfectioniasofficial · 60,812
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 August 2026
@UGC_NET_JRF_NTA_CSIR_SO · 147,519
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Confusion 9.2.11 OFFICIAL” (@confusion9211), 4,286 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/confusion9211.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.