Explore. Interact. Earn.
Conso is a Web3 lifestyle community app, transforming content discovery, interaction, and engagement into real rewards. Powered by Telegram.
Chat: @ConsoChatOfficial
Twitter/X: x.com/conso_tg
Created
Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 45 days, net -4,412. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 107,666–113,402 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 17:37
108,328
-252
17 Sept 2026, 04:18
108,580
-186
15 Sept 2026, 05:20
108,766
-136
13 Sept 2026, 11:59
108,902
-193
11 Sept 2026, 14:01
109,095
-276
8 Sept 2026, 21:59
109,371
-202
5 Sept 2026, 17:17
109,573
-233
3 Sept 2026, 17:19
109,806
-165
2 Sept 2026, 10:34
109,971
-50
1 Sept 2026, 09:05
110,021
-69
31 Aug 2026, 10:12
110,090
-105
30 Aug 2026, 08:04
110,195
-85
29 Aug 2026, 10:38
110,280
-62
28 Aug 2026, 12:34
110,342
-82
27 Aug 2026, 15:17
110,424
-163
26 Aug 2026, 13:03
110,587
-90
25 Aug 2026, 14:47
110,677
-67
24 Aug 2026, 14:57
110,744
-127
22 Aug 2026, 22:22
110,871
-167
21 Aug 2026, 14:38
111,038
first reading
Engagement
35 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.70%
avg views ÷ 108,328 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,500
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.216%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 35 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 September 2026
Posts held
35 (17 June 2026 – 17 September 2026)
Views total
84,100
Reactions total
182
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 09:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
370
Videos
7
Links
356
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
864 reactions across 33 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
464
53.7%
👍
260
30.1%
🔥
52
6.02%
🎉
38
4.40%
👏
21
2.43%
🥰
12
1.39%
😁
10
1.16%
👌
5
0.579%
🫡
2
0.231%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 960 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 17 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 35 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @conso_tg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 June 2026 to 17 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🚩 Conso Topic Recommendations
🎮 This Week’s Feature: Find Your People
A new topic update is live.
Follow an anime, tinker with Linux, or laugh at a gaming meme. The small obsessions you can’t wait to share always matter to someone else, too.
Stop scrolling alone in silos. Dive into feeds curated by people who share your exact niche and discover what fellow fans have found. ⚡️
🎮 Which niche hobby or fan community…
🚩 Conso Topic Recommendations
🩺 This Week’s Feature: Learn Judgment, Keep Compassion
A new topic update is live.
Medicine stretches from textbook answers to real human lives with no single formula. This collection connects research, clinical guidelines, real-world cases, and frontline practice.
Deepen your perspective beyond theory. Learn how to judge more carefully under uncertainty, and navigate human health wi…
🚩 Conso Topic Recommendations
🧱 This Week’s Feature: Walls & Cracks
A new topic update is live.
Some learn how to make Kubernetes, AWS, and infrastructure bulletproof; others look for the exact cracks where they break.
Building and breaking are two sides of the same craft. Understand how complex architectures hold up under pressure and gain deeper insight into how systems actually fail. ⚡️
🧱 Which infrastructure…
🚩 Conso Topic Recommendations
🌍 This Week’s Feature: Far Away, Still Human
A new topic update is live.
Borders, elections, and markets shape the headlines, but festivals, sports, and ordinary days define our shared reality. Voices from across the globe turn distant countries into lives unfolding beside our own.
Look a little closer. Beyond the unfamiliar, discover the joys, worries, and hopes that connect us all …
🚩 Conso Topic Recommendations
🚧 This Week’s Feature: World in Beta | Before Change Arrives
A new topic update is live.
Some train models, some write code, while others wonder why a simple button confuses everyone. Different scales, same hope: making the world work a little better.
This is a collection about what we build—and how we wish to live. Explore the projects and ideas that are currently in beta, waiting t…
Conso Signals 100x Catch Record: $ROBBIE
First Signal: Aug 14, 03:16 UTC
Peak Gain: +3,572%
Signal Source: George.TON's Alpha Group
Conso Signals: Real-time aggregation, automated tracking
Twitter Sync by Conso
🚩 Conso Topic Recommendations
🧠 This Week’s Feature: Beyond Code | Technology Is Human
A new topic update is live.
Some questions deserve a slower answer.Through code, algorithms, systems, and debate, these channels look for what truly holds up—and bring us a little closer to understanding the world.
Stop chasing the noise of instant tech. Explore the human side of innovation and find the signal that stands the t…
❤14
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @conso_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Conso Official Channel” (@conso_tg), 108,328 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/conso_tg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.