Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Modern Day Muslim Issues

Channel

Modern Day Muslim Issues

@contemp_muslim_issues

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

154subscribers

+23 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001822056354
TypeChannel
Username@contemp_muslim_issues
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/contemp_muslim_issues

Growth

131154142.510 August 2026 — 131 subscribers10 August 2026 — 131 subscribers11 August 2026 — 133 subscribers19 August 2026 — 137 subscribers26 August 2026 — 151 subscribers2 September 2026 — 154 subscribers10 August 20262 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 23 days, net +23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 128–157 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 13:17154+3
26 Aug 2026, 15:35151+14
19 Aug 2026, 04:55137+4
11 Aug 2026, 06:13133+2
10 Aug 2026, 06:30131no change
10 Aug 2026, 06:16131first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

33 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1751.5%
👍1133.3%
💯39.09%
🔥26.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC37 viewsread 10 August 2026

An individual who addresses proof-based arguments with popular cliches is one who has pride & promotes quietism or privatised salvation (a strand of catholic mysticism/evangelism). He wishes to shut down the haq that challenges his desires, challenges his temporary worldly comforts &/or challenges the “religion” of his forefathers, (which in a no. of cases was secular “Islam”).

Signed M S

8 Aug 2026, 19:35 UTC57 viewsread 10 August 2026

Al-Bukhari related, on the authority of Abu Hurayrah Radiallahu Anhu that Nabi ﷺ said: “Allah marvels at a people who enter Jannah in chains.” Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar said in Fatḥ al-Bari: “The murad of ‘by the chains being on their necks’ is restricted to the haal of this dunya. So there’s nothing that precludes construing the wording literally. The implicit meaning is: they (captives) enter Jannah having been, before t

Signed M S

8 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC56 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

In the authoritative Kitaab, Kabeeri the following Shar'i pronouncement is recorded: "The husband is entitled to beat his wife for her neglect of Salaat or ghusl. And, if she does not abstain from her act of neglecting Salaat by means of beating, he can divorce her even though he is unable to pay her mahr (i.e. in the event of him not having yet paid her mahr). It's better that he meets Allah Ta'ala (in the Aakhirah

1

Signed M S

8 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC280 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

al-Haskafi said (al-Durr al-Mukhtar, in the margin of Hashiyat Ibn Abidin, 3/188–189): "The master disciplines (yu’azziru) his slave, & the husband his wife, for her abandonment of the legally-prescribed/mandated adornment (al-zeenah al-shar’iyyah) despite her ability to perform it, & for her abandonment of ghusl from janabah, or for going out of the house without right, or if she uncovers her face before a non-mahr

🔥2

Signed M S

6 Aug 2026, 22:21 UTC68 viewsread 10 August 2026

https://themajlis.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/The-Sharee-ruling-on-Mufti-Taqi-Sbs-interview-with-a-Russian-woman.pdf The Shar’ee ruling on Mufti Taqi Sb’s interview with a Russian woman

Signed M S

6 Aug 2026, 22:12 UTC70 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

In a world that hastens towards the material measure of production, an age-old question is being posed anew today: “how was the woman of yesterday, with her simple fitrah, able to build a cohesive society, whilst many households today stumble despite the claims (“da’wah”) of progress/development?” Verily, the mas’alah doesn’t lie in a lack of resourcefulness/means, but in a shift in the center of gravity & a scatter

3

Signed M S

5 Aug 2026, 21:06 UTC82 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Apostasy in the Hanafi Madhab https://justpaste.it/do9al

1

Signed M S

4 Aug 2026, 00:18 UTC106 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

The Matn of al-Durr al-Mukhtar & the commentary of Ibn Abidin “Whoever apostatises, the haakim presents to him Islam as a recommendation (istihbaban) according to the madhab, because the call has (already) reached him (بلوغ الدعوة) & his doubt is clarified/uncovered. And he’s obligatorily (wujuban) imprisoned, & it’s (also) recommended for 3 days. Islam is presented to him on each of those days, if he asks for a re

2

Signed M S

1 Aug 2026, 00:13 UTC139 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Where harm/sins become all-pervasive in society & those in authority let it gain a foothold, then vice is normalised, to the point that it becomes the “haq” for the teacher & the student. The very few who challenge are silenced by predominantly online outrage, ridicule, belittlement & abuse. (Most of the public, for various reasons, are infirm when it comes to physical violence. This has been outsourced to & monopo

5

Signed M S

31 Jul 2026, 02:05 UTC132 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Nowadays, our cowardice is such, that from layman to “learned,” Muslims have become incapacitated/neutered from even saying that the conflict is between Muslims & the Yahood as per the Qur’aan. Instead the conflict between Muslims & Yahood is labelled as one between zionists & Muslims, or Israel v Palestine. So yes Menk’s the bottom of the table in this regard, for not even being able to mention Israel, but we’re o

👍2

Signed M S

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @contemp_muslim_issues. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Modern Day Muslim Issues” (@contemp_muslim_issues), 154 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/contemp_muslim_issues.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.