Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 49 days, net -56. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,474–10,549 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Sept 2026, 21:17
10,483
-9
18 Sept 2026, 14:16
10,492
+4
16 Sept 2026, 07:59
10,488
-2
14 Sept 2026, 11:41
10,490
-3
13 Sept 2026, 00:59
10,493
-6
11 Sept 2026, 01:56
10,499
-5
5 Sept 2026, 00:36
10,504
+2
3 Sept 2026, 07:49
10,502
-1
1 Sept 2026, 22:48
10,503
+1
31 Aug 2026, 22:16
10,502
-1
30 Aug 2026, 21:52
10,503
-2
29 Aug 2026, 22:24
10,505
-3
28 Aug 2026, 22:25
10,508
-3
27 Aug 2026, 21:14
10,511
-1
26 Aug 2026, 19:08
10,512
-2
25 Aug 2026, 16:09
10,514
-1
24 Aug 2026, 17:17
10,515
-1
23 Aug 2026, 00:46
10,516
-2
21 Aug 2026, 17:38
10,518
-1
19 Aug 2026, 11:35
10,519
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 5 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
4,931 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
2,125
43.1%
👏
801
16.2%
🤔
634
12.9%
🎉
592
12.0%
🐳
482
9.77%
🤮
179
3.63%
🤯
118
2.39%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,931 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 December 2024 to 2 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
214
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 17 we hold a reading for · 88%
Most on one post
35
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @conversationsaboutmusic. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 December 2024 to 2 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
В экономике, в которой увольняют тысячами уже даже казалось бы неприкасаемых айтишников, не может быть никакой другой логики, кроме как жестких сокращений без лирики и чрезмерной рефлексии. Это наблюдается абсолютно везде: люди больше не могут себе позволить то, что могли. Глобально обсуждаются непродающиеся стадионы у абсолютных глобальных хитмейкеров и уход из стримингов из-за регулярного повышения стоимости подпис…
В июле 2025 года новый секси-конкурент привычным соцсетям Substack привлёк 100 млн долларов, крупнейший раунд за восемь лет существования компании. Для платформы, выросшей из сервиса email-рассылок в единорога и полноценную экосистему для авторов с оценкой в 1,1 млрд — это, конечно, вау. Особенно в мире, где медийные активы самые нестабильные и низкомаржинальные, и особенно сейчас
С 2020 года индустрия заговорила о …
2025й — первый год, когда индустрия начала официально фиксировать свои отношения с ИИ. Судебные иски, публичные попытки договориться, громкие пресс‑релизы — все это была длинная прелюдия и игра на опережение. Сценарий уже знаком: новая технология сносит всех на своем пути, бизнес встает в позу и пытается все заблокировать, прикрываясь артистами и их легаси. В итоге музгиганты кое‑как договариваются на крохи от будуще…
10 лет симпатичная дата, чтобы порефлексировать о профессии и индустрии
в которой конфликт интересов и конфиденциальность для многих - пустой звук
в любой книге о менеджменте артистов первым пунктом идет рассказ о фидуциарной обязанности ставить интересы артиста выше собственных. это не нужно закреплять в договоре, полное доверие и секретность подразумеваются автоматически. например, нельзя представлять артиста и п…
Главный музыкальный булли
В 2012 году в музыкальной индустрии вместо четырех мейджоров осталось всего три: легендарный британский EMI разделили и распродали. Для музыкальной индустрии это был горький момент, а для нынешней большой тройки, конечно, великий. Именно после этой сделки Universal Music Group стал бесспорным лидером и уже точно музыкальной компанией №1.
Сделку Universal Music одобрили только с одним услов…
В ответ на обвинения Дрейка о снижении ставки на 30% в обмен на рекомендации, представитель Spotify заявил сегодня в комментарии для MBW: «У Spotify нет экономического стимула для того, чтобы пользователи стримили Not Like Us вместо треков Дрейка. Только один из инструментов Spotify for Artists, Marquee, был использован для продвижения этой песни за €500 во Франции. Marquee — это визуальная реклама, которая отображае…
Есть одна общая черта у корпоративных сотрудников: когда их нанимают, они начинают работать, конечно, в самой лучшей компании на свете, а до и после, то есть без них, — она так себе. Мой любимый жанр — это когда сотрудник начинает хуесосить свою самую лучшую буквально месяц назад компанию, когда он уже ушел. Чаще всего это делают люди, которые с первого дня ставят хештеги в инсте под фоточками с тимбилдингов, будто э…
👏422🔥118🤔23🎉16🐳10🤮9
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @conversationsaboutmusic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“i hate being a manager its awesome” (@conversationsaboutmusic), 10,483 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/conversationsaboutmusic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
