Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ‌ oxic

Channel

‌ oxic

@cooicooa

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

78,296subscribers

+2,161 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001876902738
TypeChannel
Username@cooicano
Descriptionwhy me
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cooicooa

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

@cooicooa was previously reachable at these 2 handles, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@cooicooa
held 29 August 202629 August 2026
@cooiaicoo
held 14 August 202614 August 2026

Growth

578,41739,2117 August 2026 — 76,135 subscribers7 August 2026 — 76,135 subscribers8 August 2026 — 76,050 subscribers8 August 2026 — 75,946 subscribers10 August 2026 — 76,293 subscribers11 August 2026 — 76,251 subscribers12 August 2026 — 76,215 subscribers13 August 2026 — 76,146 subscribers14 August 2026 — 77,373 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5 subscribers14 August 2026 — 77,321 subscribers16 August 2026 — 77,274 subscribers17 August 2026 — 77,187 subscribers18 August 2026 — 77,150 subscribers19 August 2026 — 77,094 subscribers20 August 2026 — 77,053 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6 subscribers21 August 2026 — 76,962 subscribers23 August 2026 — 77,142 subscribers24 August 2026 — 77,271 subscribers25 August 2026 — 77,323 subscribers29 August 2026 — 78,417 subscribers29 August 2026 — 78,366 subscribers30 August 2026 — 78,278 subscribers31 August 2026 — 78,290 subscribers1 September 2026 — 78,342 subscribers2 September 2026 — 78,381 subscribers4 September 2026 — 78,349 subscribers6 September 2026 — 78,296 subscribers78,2967 August 20266 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 30 days, net +2,161. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 13:5778,296-53
4 Sept 2026, 05:4178,349-32
2 Sept 2026, 16:1778,381+39
1 Sept 2026, 18:4678,342+52
31 Aug 2026, 20:2878,290+12
30 Aug 2026, 22:2478,278-88
29 Aug 2026, 20:1278,366-51
29 Aug 2026, 00:0078,417+1,094
25 Aug 2026, 22:4477,323+52
24 Aug 2026, 20:3977,271+129
23 Aug 2026, 09:4277,142+180
21 Aug 2026, 20:3476,962+76,956
21 Aug 2026, 13:076-77,047
20 Aug 2026, 15:5677,053-41
19 Aug 2026, 18:2477,094-56
18 Aug 2026, 19:1377,150-37
17 Aug 2026, 16:4777,187-87
16 Aug 2026, 14:3477,274-47
14 Aug 2026, 22:2477,321+77,316
14 Aug 2026, 16:075first reading

Engagement

139 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.9%
avg views ÷ 78,296 subscribers
Avg views / post
26,500
89 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
90
of 139 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026
Posts held139 (30 July 20269 September 2026)
Views total2,362,938
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Sept 2026, 08:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
412
Videos
28
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
23s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

8 Sept 2026, 14:29 UTC≈9,770 viewsread 9 September 2026
Photo

when people think you're ignoring them but life has you like this:

6 Sept 2026, 20:06 UTC889 viewsread 6 September 2026
Forwarded from @urthughts

“Summer ended without a single one of its promises being fulfilled.”

Showing the 12 most recent of 139 posts we hold for @cooicooa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@cooicooa edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 September 2026
Most recent edit
8 September 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Aug 2026, 00:07 UTCAnonymous Poll2,140 voters approx.

Konkur this year?

  1. Yes37%
  2. No63%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 139 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 9 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

ژوسکآ
@thisisjouska · 71
3 posts
忍耐🧚🏻‍♀️
@Benolays · 226
2 posts
vas elin🦴🇦🇺
@elinlhlll · 12,089
2 posts
‌ ‌ ‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌𝒞𝓱𝓮𝓬𝓴𝓶𝓪𝓽𝓮
@endless_tongue · 74
2 posts
Part of book
@part_of_book_23_32 · 39
2 posts
𝑄𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎
@Querencia_dl · 46
2 posts
In the End ,
@suedbyh · 558
2 posts
void cat
@TimeOfDying · 3,809
2 posts
𝖵'𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝖺 (𝗀𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗉) 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗒
@a_pyromaniac · 135
1 post
Shirley
@anne_shirley_z · 184
1 post
aprilisim (showgirl)
@aprilisim · 69
1 post
راز شب🌖arluna
@Arluna · 40
1 post
𝘼𝙪𝙧𝙤𝙧𝙖...
@Aurora_K7 · 99
1 post
پــیـــونـــی؛
@aynoushhhh · 62
1 post
࣪˖ ⋆ 𝐒𝐨𝐨𝐲𝐢'𝐬 𝐁𝐥𝐮𝐞 𝐍𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐬 🌌 ִֶָ១
@Blueynotes · 2,119
1 post
bottle of tears
@blur_mind · 64
1 post
marginalia
@c1ipr · 74
1 post
غارنشینِ‌عصرِنوین
@caveroome · 122
1 post
𝚩𝗎𝗍𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖿𝗅𝗒 𝚩𝗋𝖾𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗌་𓂃. ་ ִֶָ⋆‌‌
@ChildOfTheEclipse · 46
1 post
dogs > people
@dailyanddogs · 137
1 post
𝖣𝖾𝗆𝗂𝖺𝗇.
@Demian_13 · 407
1 post
°•firefly~♧
@firefly_daily · 29
1 post
Fly🏳️‍🌈🍃
@fly00019 · 66
1 post
FOCUS.
@focus_xy · 135
1 post
‌ ‌ flawless پك مود
@grlstic · 1,627
1 post
rozhiii speaking...
@helloitsrozhiii · 351
1 post
Death whispered a lullaby
@homaome · 3,551
1 post
Pic🤷🏻‍♀
@itjustforfunm · 53
1 post
Issues
@jeofuck · 93
1 post
Juniper tree 🌳
@junipertreee · 50
1 post
505
@kafartt · 273
1 post
𝒜𝓁𝓁 𝒷𝓎 𝒜 ོ
@kh_1ife · 7
1 post
くろねこ
@korieow · 219
1 post
طلوع؛
@lastnightthoughts · 25
1 post
Let’s Read Every Day
@letsreadeveryday · 1,713
1 post
ماری وند‌ ء دریایی
@mariyvand · 158
1 post
sonic
@mecore_st · 133
1 post
ㅤᐟ 𝓦𝗁𝗂𝗍𝖾 𝖯𝖾𝖺𝗋𝗅
@morvaridesefidd · 119
1 post
Moon 🌙
@my_wordsp · 30
1 post
🧚‍♂
@myblueside7 · 264
1 post
ꜱɪʟᴋʏ ɪꜱ ᴛʜᴇʀᴇ
@NeverlandDrown · 2
1 post
Back to blue.
@Newdistraction · 50
1 post
آهو
@nightlymoonn · 79
1 post
the pearl of paris
@parisiantears · 444
1 post
پِژواک`
@pezvak7 · 123
1 post
تشعشعات‌مغزِ‌یک‌پیشی
@pishithoughts · 285
1 post
ᅠmork
@ranwxing · 43
1 post
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ fever.
@RedLoverForLife · 52
1 post
𝕽𝖊𝖛𝖊𝖓𝖆
@Revena_9 · 26
1 post
ֶָྀིྀི֢ ˖^ֶָ᪲᪲᪲꒰.
@SSUVAI · 189
1 post
🍎
@strawida · 55
1 post
Étoile،
@stupidchannelwstupidmemories · 1,102
1 post
𝘏𝘦𝘭𝘭'𝘴 𝘤𝘭𝘰𝘸𝘯
@tcuybch · 134
1 post
The Poetry Room
@theepoetryroom · 225
1 post
𝙣𝙖𝙟𝙞
@thenajiii · 100
1 post
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤweapon
@tnad0 · 24
1 post
vellichor
@ttxytie · 8,996
1 post
دو لیوان چای نبات و جامعه شناسی
@twocupoftea_withsociology · 58
1 post

@Wildrose_Nell · 973
1 post
Orange garden🍊
@YasminGarden · 44
1 post
Not here to rescue u!!!!
@zankokuE · 15
1 post
dean ʼs feelings for cas ( let's die )
@zfltr · 49
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“‌ oxic” (@cooicooa), 78,296 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cooicooa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.