Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for коральчики

Channel

коральчики

@corall995

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

302subscribers

+90 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003541834361
TypeChannel
Username@corall995
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/corall995

Growth

2123022576 August 2026 — 212 subscribers7 August 2026 — 212 subscribers7 August 2026 — 213 subscribers15 August 2026 — 238 subscribers24 August 2026 — 254 subscribers30 August 2026 — 291 subscribers7 September 2026 — 302 subscribers6 August 20267 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 32 days, net +90. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 199–316 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 14:19302+11
30 Aug 2026, 13:35291+37
24 Aug 2026, 05:57254+16
15 Aug 2026, 17:36238+25
7 Aug 2026, 13:07213+1
7 Aug 2026, 03:32212no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:31212first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

359 reactions across 17 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10027.9%
💘5715.9%
custom 58303556812653270963710.3%
custom 5330018027373103564308.36%
🍓236.41%
custom 5420111666555684165215.85%
💋164.46%
❤‍🔥133.62%
🔥123.34%
custom 5287229956852590863102.79%
custom 536639143968299672292.51%
custom 582814722196662638992.51%
custom 583220900260322454171.95%
custom 582777746823211398041.11%
custom 542500162855609718230.836%
custom 546104576290328089720.557%
custom 582571471140396206920.557%
😭20.557%
custom 520662997780558999810.279%
custom 546069569300388904310.279%

Custom emoji. 13 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 359 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
109
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 17 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
101
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @corall995. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC30 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

я предупреждаю .. если что, я не буду менять основной стиль, который у меня сейчас, просто хочу иметь второй. просто заметила отписки..

custom 58277774682321139804custom 53663914396829967222

6 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC33 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

сегодня без оформления, так как это тест

❤‍🔥74custom 58322090026032245413🍓1💘1

5 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC51 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @shlvosPhoto

Эксперименты со стилем, рад рт и реактам Мейби криповая картинка

8❤‍🔥2💘1

5 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC55 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌈 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩 🤩 тестирую стиль.. не против критики!! 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 #spokeishere #unstableuniverse

custom 533001802737310356415custom 583035568126532709610custom 54201116665556841658💘1

5 Aug 2026, 06:56 UTC54 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ребятттт, подскажите, пожалуйста, как рисовать в таком стиле и как он назвввется? очень-очень хочу попробовать, но совсем не знаю с чего начать .. кто шарит или имеет похожий стиль, вам не будет сложно подсказать??.. СПАСИБО ЗАРАНЕЕ!! удалю попозже

💘8custom 53300180273731035645custom 583220900260322454142

3 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC73 views7 reactions8 Starsread 7 August 2026

СПАСИБО БОЛЬШОЕ ЗА 100 ЗВЕЗД

7

3 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC78 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

как думаете. рисовать вифиса?

custom 53300180273731035648😭2

3 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC88 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @shlvosPhoto

кораллви фгрокс смс регистрация✅

10❤‍🔥4🍓2💘1

3 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC96 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌟👑🌟👑🌟👑🌟👑🌟👑 нет, Пэррот, не будет тебе Вифиса. 🥹🥹реакции? 🥹🥹 #parrotx2 #unstableuniverse

🍓17💘12💋6custom 54201116665556841654custom 58257147114039620692

2 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC111 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

8 часов потратила кстати…. моя самая долгая работа

🔥118💋1💘1

2 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC135 views62 reactions101 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 😀 🥹🥹 😀😀😀 🥹🥹 🤩 репосты/реакции? 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 #wemmbu #unstableuniverse

custom 58303556812653270962714custom 54201116665556841659custom 53663914396829967227custom 58281472219666263893💘1🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC155 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

я старалась :3

14custom 58281472219666263896custom 53300180273731035642💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @corall995. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“коральчики” (@corall995), 302 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/corall995.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.