Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Correct tips FREE

Channel

Correct tips FREE

@correct_tips_score

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

636subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 12 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001613546655
TypeChannel
Username@correct_tips_score
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 September 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/correct_tips_score

Growth

63663863712 Sept 2026, 10:47 — 638 subscribers12 Sept 2026, 11:22 — 638 subscribers13 Sept 2026, 11:17 — 636 subscribers12 Sept 2026, 10:4713 Sept 2026, 11:17
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 636–638 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 11:17636-2
12 Sept 2026, 11:22638no change
12 Sept 2026, 10:47638first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.67%
avg views ÷ 636 subscribers
Avg views / post
16.9
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 September 2026
Posts held20 (10 September 2026 – 12 September 2026)
Views total339
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Sept 2026, 11:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

12 Sept 2026, 10:48 UTC4 viewsread 12 September 2026
Poll

✅Are we keeping the winning streak going today? 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠

  1. I need not 💔0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Sept 2026, 09:59 UTC6 viewsread 12 September 2026
Photo

🎾 Zverev and Shelton to Face Off in the US Open Final! 🔥 🇺🇸 Last night, Ben Shelton pulled off a thrilling comeback victory against 🇺🇸 Frances Tiafoe, winning 4-6, 6-3, 6-3, 7-5. This marks the first time in his career that Shelton has reached a Grand Slam final. 🤞Now, Ben is just one win away from breaking a historic drought—it's been since 2003 that an American man has won a Grand Slam title, when Andy Roddick cl…

11 Sept 2026, 23:28 UTC12 viewsread 12 September 2026
Photo

❗️🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠❗️ ✅ Congratulations on your two solid wins in a row! I'm looking forward to seeing your winning screenshots! I've been really busy these days, so I apologize for not being able to respond to everyone right away. I promise I'll catch up soon! In about an hour, I'll be posting a free match for you, and I'm also waiting for your requests! 🔥Give me ur reactions guys🔥 🏆🏆🏆 🇪🇪 Lajal + Sabalenka 🇧🇾 🪙 FREE BE…

11 Sept 2026, 21:07 UTC11 viewsread 12 September 2026

​⚡️I've got an insane offer for you where you can win some serious cash today! If you're interested in a sure match, slide into my DMs⬇️ 👑 @jacob_fixedboss 👑 ❗️Looking for bankrolls starting at €200—can't wait to hear from you!

11 Sept 2026, 13:34 UTC17 viewsread 12 September 2026
Photo

🎾 "I don't care" – 🇧🇾Aryna Sabalenka on losing the top spot in the world rankings ⚡️ 🇧🇾 "I really don't care. I completely understand how difficult it is to become the number one player in the world. It takes an enormous amount of work, and it was definitely one of my goals. But right now, there’s not much I could do. In the middle of the season, I wasn't performing well, and 🎾 Elena took advantage of that and snat…

11 Sept 2026, 00:35 UTC20 viewsread 12 September 2026

​⚡️I've got an insane offer for you where you can win some serious cash today! If you're interested in a sure match, slide into my DMs⬇️ 👑 @jacob_fixedboss 👑 ❗️Looking for bankrolls starting at €200—can't wait to hear from you!

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @correct_tips_score. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Sept 2026, 10:48 UTCAnonymous Poll1 voter

✅Are we keeping the winning streak going today? 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠

  1. I need not 💔0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 September 2026 to 12 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Bullet Bet Predictions
@bulletbetpredictions · 26,408
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 September 2026
HABBY fOREX ACAdEMy
@habbyfxad · 21,380
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 23 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Correct tips FREE” (@correct_tips_score), 636 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/correct_tips_score.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.