Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ржавчина ногтей

Channel

ржавчина ногтей

@corrosionnails

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,977subscribers

+53 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002109035600
TypeChannel
Username@corrosionnails
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/corrosionnails

Growth

1,9241,9771,950.57 August 2026 — 1,924 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,924 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,925 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,931 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,938 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,940 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,939 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,963 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,970 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,977 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 32 days, net +53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,916–1,985 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 11:181,977+7
2 Sept 2026, 20:031,970+7
30 Aug 2026, 23:471,963+24
27 Aug 2026, 19:371,939-1
24 Aug 2026, 10:561,940+2
20 Aug 2026, 21:281,938+7
17 Aug 2026, 16:261,931+6
14 Aug 2026, 14:571,925+1
7 Aug 2026, 22:321,924no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:031,924first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

375 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 530562945930968217116243.2%
custom 546311898227174455911831.5%
custom 53412728087836273159525.3%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 375 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC325 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ладно большие мокренькие)

custom 53056294593096821716

7 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC357 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

на этих двух конкретно столько слоев всякой всячины что я до последнего не знала что получится люблю процесс за это

custom 54631189822717445598custom 53056294593096821713

7 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC373 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54631189822717445598custom 53412728087836273155

7 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC384 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

не люблю прямые ассоциации поэтому бейсик голубые оттенки+ракушки+пену решила не делать НО всегда когда ныряю заглядываюсь на текстуру мертвых кораллов и морского дна

custom 54631189822717445597

7 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC392 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

клиентка попросила что то морское

custom 530562945930968217123custom 53412728087836273153

5 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC516 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

before++after

custom 546311898227174455932custom 534127280878362731516

5 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC518 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 546311898227174455926custom 53056294593096821716custom 53412728087836273152

5 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC538 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

у меня профдеформация я вижу везде текстуры для ногтей я хочу делать природные ногти прямо сейчас

custom 530562945930968217123custom 534127280878362731510custom 54631189822717445597

5 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC531 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

##exploring

custom 534127280878362731521custom 546311898227174455912custom 53056294593096821717

4 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC576 views107 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

подписчиков платформы telegram пожалуй тоже выкосим. смотрите

custom 530562945930968217163custom 534127280878362731528custom 546311898227174455916

3 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC644 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

почему меня прокляла платформа instagram?? разница между публикациями неделя?? выжило только 19 подписчиков 💔💔

custom 530562945930968217131custom 534127280878362731510custom 54631189822717445592

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @corrosionnails. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ржавчина ногтей” (@corrosionnails), 1,977 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/corrosionnails.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.