Channel
@cosplay_blacklist
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,136subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001891168159 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cosplay_blacklist |
| Created | 2 November 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cosplay_blacklist |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 00:58 | 1,136 | -3 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:17 | 1,139 | -3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:01 | 1,142 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:23 | 1,143 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 1,145 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 09:22 | 1,146 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 1,147 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 1,148 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 1,149 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:20 | 1,152 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 1,153 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 1,153 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 5 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
366 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 183 | 50.0% | |
| 🕊 | 134 | 36.6% | |
| 🐳 | 49 | 13.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 366 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2024 to 9 May 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Канал проработал добротные полтора года. За все это время был, на деле, только один админ — Тин. :D Сейчас к сожалению я не в ресурсе дальше работать во благо слития мошонок, так что вынуждена полностью закрыть канал и перестать принимать посты. Хотя, как некоторые заметили, я и так уже многие сообщения игнорировала, либо подолгу на них не отвечаю. Комментарии закрыты, но не удалены, на всякий случай. Спасибо за подд…
🕊100🐳20❤15
#Обман #Безответственность #Негативный_отзыв @usui_v 1042979008 или Shift Заказала у вигмейкера укладку парика, обсудили детали, цену, парик отправила сразу на её адрес. С почты она его забрала, что подтвердила кружочком, начался процесс работы, иногда я интересовалась как идёт прогресс, реже раза в месяц. А затем, 13 марта мне просто перестали отвечать. Что с париком, что с укладкой, куда ушли мои деньги - неизве…
❤60🕊13🐳8
Заказ наконец-то приехал и при осмотре на пункте выдачи я сразу заметил кучу брака (зацепки, дырки причем большие и на видных местах), на что продавец мне сказала что может это я неаккуратно его так порвал))) к тому же от костюма был ужасный неприятный запах пота, не знаю почему нельзя было его постирать. В ответ я получил, что костюм вообще не мой, я думала что он постиран, и вообще дырок не было это наверное вы так…
❤37🐳5🕊4
#Негативный_отзыв #Безответственность @nilliecs - продавец Заказал у девушки костюм на Се Ляня, довольно быстро договорились о покупке через авито доставку, по договоренности я оформил заказ и стал ждать отправки. Авито назначил первый срок отправки заказа для продавца, он уже начал подходить к концу, поэтому я стал писать продавцу, чтобы узнать, когда мне смогут отправить заказ - в ответ меня поигнорили (при этом …
❤20🐳5🕊3
#Негативный_отзыв #Безответственность Тудуду, пришло время гневного поста, ну или статья коротко о том, как я поймала неудачный опыт при заказе пошива. Речь пойдет о швее «Наталья Прокопенко» (её инсту прикреплю позже в комментарии или к посту) Ещё в августе 2023 года я обратилась к ней за пошивом Рана с выставки, все рассчитали, костюм выплачивался и шился успешно, казалось бы, проблем не должно возникнуть, ведь …
❤51🕊14🐳11
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @cosplay_blacklist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@cosplay_blacklist named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Косплей ЧС” (@cosplay_blacklist), 1,136 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cosplay_blacklist.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.