Channel
@coursestools
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,968subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001975720032 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @coursestools |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/coursestools |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 2,968 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 2,965 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 2,966 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 2,965 | +3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 2,962 | +4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:57 | 2,958 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:10 | 2,959 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 2,958 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:09 | 2,958 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 3 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
98 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 41 | 41.8% | |
| 👍 | 36 | 36.7% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 10.2% | |
| 🏆 | 4 | 4.08% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 3.06% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 2.04% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 1.02% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.02% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 98reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2026 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✅ We are back online! Provider partly restored the work of all servers and our server appeared in the restored batch. Our team restored the website the moment we saw it, so now you can continue using our services. Visit coursestools.com if you have any unfinished business left 🤗 🤝 We appreciate your patience!
❤4
⚠️ 🔥 Due to excessive excessive heat in Europe, our server provider experiences issues with cooling the servers in the data center – massive amount of servers are down, including ours We are monitoring the situation and are in close communication with server provider’s support. The moment they fix their cooling issues, our team will restore the work of the website and connected services. The heat issue caught by u…
👍6
✅ Issue resolved Server provider resolved all issues on his servers – access granting service is online. Every free trial and paid subscriber should have received requested access by now. 🤝 We appreciate your patience!
❤5
⚠️ We are experiencing issues with automatic access granting This issue is on the side of our server provider, not ours. Our team was told to wait until the issue is resolved. Average estimated time of resolution on their side: 24h Access to all free trial and paid subscribers will be restored the moment the servers will be fixed by the provider. ⏳Thank you for your patience!
🥰3❤1
✅ Website is up and running! 🤗 Come visit us and take your free 7-day trial to see the dope toolset we offer ⭐️ Support: @win_world
❤3
⚠️ Our website & alert service are currently down, because our server provider experiences electrical outage Website will be up as soon as server provider solve its problems ✉️ If you had any questions about our products, services or subscriptions, please reach directly to us in Telegram – @win_world, while we are waiting for updates from server provider.
🤯2❤1
💎 The preview for SMC Signals has officially ended 1 day ago — it is time for your feedback! 👍 If you have used this indicator and you have something to say, please fill » this Google Form « 🗳 As we stated before, only your voices will decide whether this indicator is good enough to be published to our main subscription. 💬 "Too raw", "low quality", "didn't like it" — whatever you say, we will consider it. Fill out…
👍3
💎 To anyone new, who wants to try out this indicator free of charge — just take our 7-dayfree trial! 🚫 No credit card, zero pressure 📌 All you have to do is: 1. Open coursestools.com 2. Click Sign Up 3. Fill up your data and enter your TradingView nickname (if you will be able to change it later if needed) 4. Click Create my account 5. Watch our greeting message (or click Skip) 6. In pop-up form for free trial cli…
🔥3❤🔥1
💎 To our existing users and trial-access holders: you too have access to this indicator now, so don't hesitate to try it out as soon as you can! 🕙 Time flies fast and on May 3rd the access to the preview version will be revoked from everyone, so to anyone, who wanted to try this indicator out, — you better start early!
👍2
😧 Almost an unanimous decision It is settled then – preview for our signal indicator will go live in... ▶️ oh, it is already live! 📈 Come check out this new indicator — SMC Signals — on our TradingView: https://www.tradingview.com/script/emxc0M3g-SMC-Signals-Preview-WinWorld/ 📌 The usage guide for the indicator is the indicator's description on TradingView as well 👀 It will be in private preview mode for 2 weeks…
❤3
💭 We are currently testing something, that we have never developed before — signal indicator 👀 What you see on these screenshots is a sneak-peek into our new indicator, which produces signals based on our World Class SMC + Smart Point strategy, explained in > this article < not so long ago. It will have: ✨ direct Long and Short signals ✨ take-profit and stop-loss suggestions ✨ dashboard with trade stats ✨ fully cu…
👍11🏆4🔥2❤1
👨🏻🔬 Should we give you our experimental signal indicator for a test?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤13👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @coursestools. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
👨🏻🔬 Should we give you our experimental signal indicator for a test?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2026 to 1 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 491,481 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CoursesTools” (@coursestools), 2,968 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coursestools.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.