Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 重庆寻欢录

Channel

重庆寻欢录

@cqchasingdream

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,806subscribers

+681 since we began measuring on 6 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001864842149
TypeChannel
Username@cqchasingdream
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 September 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cqchasingdream

Growth

4,1254,8064,465.56 September 2026 — 4,125 subscribers6 September 2026 — 4,125 subscribers9 September 2026 — 4,585 subscribers13 September 2026 — 4,742 subscribers17 September 2026 — 4,806 subscribers6 September 202617 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 11 days, net +681. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,023–4,908 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 14:014,806+64
13 Sept 2026, 05:014,742+157
9 Sept 2026, 10:224,585+460
6 Sept 2026, 17:224,125no change
6 Sept 2026, 16:474,125first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 3 September 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.7%
avg views ÷ 4,806 subscribers
Avg views / post
610
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.209%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026
Posts held9 (3 September 20266 September 2026)
Views total5,488
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Sept 2026, 17:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
49s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 3 September 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Sept 2026, 01:47 UTC455 views1 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Photo

🎰 贤时局白嫖抽奖第二十二波 📮 参与条件: 🎫 加入-流苏之地 🎫 加入-兰兰的频道 🎫 加入-重庆水群 └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 8 条 🎫 加入-小小的房间 🎫 加入-安安 🎫 加入-雾都逼友の谈 🎫 加入-重庆寻欢录 🎁 奖品内容: 💰️ 兰兰1P白嫖劵 × 1 💰️ 安安1P白嫖劵 × 1 💰️ 小小1P白嫖劵 × 1 💰️ 流苏1P白嫖劵 × 1 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 贤时局白嫖抽奖第二十二波 总计85个自营老师已参与,感谢支持! 1.老师生理期不同,中奖后在3个开课日兑奖;过期不侯,不得买卖、转让! 2.退出频道、炸号,不予兑换。 3.中奖后凭获奖信息自行联系老师兑奖,要求反馈报告。 4.如遇兑奖过期、炸号等状况,经老师确认后,老师的白嫖劵流入群内活跃度抽奖,按相应规定即时抽出。 注:管理员将不定期踢出水群内“疑似人员”,最终中奖人若已被踢出水群,不得领奖。奖品转入活跃度抽奖。遭受误踢可申报,一

1

5 Sept 2026, 13:47 UTC280 views1 reactionsread 6 September 2026

重庆精品自营推荐榜 第三十二篇 https://t.me/cqcdbureau 老师:幼兮 作者:骚骚 ( 重庆白嫖王) 稿件: 贤时局:https://t.me/cqcdbureau 老师:幼兮 逼友:骚骚 颜值:9 身材:9 服务:8 态度:9 细节正文:我很少晚上出击的,幼兮宝宝要回校,活动突然选中了我,果断出击。教室是小区楼,房间宽大,有淡淡的香味。幼兮宝宝一身淡蓝色JK裙,进门就是一个拥抱,颜值和照片没区别,少有的幼萝系,声音嗲嗲的叫哥哥,大眼萌妹,俏皮可爱。拉着你来沙发休息,态度热情,又喜欢笑,一直在言语关心,哥哥叫个不停,情绪价值给很到位。 坐沙发上一边聊天,一边开蛇,同时我的手就伸进幼兮的衣服,一边揉搓她的奶子,一边帮她把裙子脱了下来。幼兮宝宝的胸,在嫩妹幼萝里算大的,饱满圆挺,配合身材恰到好处,揉搓起来真是爱不释手,腰细无赘肉,皮肤质感还不错,要是再白点就完美了。调了一会情,

1

5 Sept 2026, 06:59 UTC550 viewsread 6 September 2026
Photo

在你生命中,一定遇到一个叫兰兰的女孩儿

4 Sept 2026, 16:34 UTC808 viewsread 6 September 2026

老师:梦吖 逼友:沧溟 @Ansirwong9966 颜值:10.0 身材:9.0 服务:9.0 态度:10.0 人照一致10分,照片是刘海乖乖女风格,现实里发丝随意拢起,添了几分御姐气韵。 真实颜值依然10分,眉眼间有几分阿兰的神韵,妆容精致,不落俗套。 160不到的身高,小巧玲珑,比例完美。 笑起来甜美可爱,语调慢条斯理,软软糯糯,难得的清纯感。 洗澡半自助,换上白丝,完美匹配气质。 没有冰冷的流程与刻意的讨好,一切都如恋人交叠的呼吸般自然蔓延。 主动蛇纹,脱毛白虎,里外都粉,舔弄蜜穴,娇喘,咬指,红脸,身体时不时颤抖。 逼口小,紧致,新手要有准备。 女上是怕的,传教轻轻插入,九浅一深,循序渐进,淫水泛滥。 实在是怕弄伤她,我主动缴械。 妹妹癖好是吃手指拇儿。 现实里如果遇到,妹妹是绝对理想型, 想娶回家那种,我儿豁。 总结:小梦还不是完全体,和她做爱感觉到克制,是羞怯,隐约有点m属性。 北岸心尖尖,真胸B杯🤓 价格:

3 Sept 2026, 02:01 UTC940 viewsread 6 September 2026

贤时局:https://t.me/cqcdbureau 老师:三上悠亚 逼友:瑞 @Arantir999 颜值:9 身材:10 服务:8.5 态度:9 二刷悠亚了。再次感慨能起这个艺名的确实太有实料了。 照片是假照,但真人颜值也不算差。亮点在于超级炸裂的身材,真~无科技大D,白皮,后入臀浪翻滚,随便🐍。 性格略有点腼腆。女上坐下来那一刻,我差点整个惊坐起来,上头的暖烫和紧致的紧润😍—— 我缓了几下才说得出话:“今天才上班么?” “你怎么知道?”(边喘气边好奇的问) “我不仅知道,还感觉得出你最近没跟男朋友做过😜” (脸颊羞红,然后继续摇) 。。。。。。 🐻真的是又大又软,不得已吃了个饱。多点齐攻下,乳头硬了好几次,每次都伴随着下面一阵欲罢不能的紧缩😇。妹妹多线失守,我也没好到哪去,换到第四个姿势就支撑不住了,只能提前豹社😫💦💦 总结:顶级身材、升天昆感、女友体验❤ 价

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @cqchasingdream. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“重庆寻欢录” (@cqchasingdream), 4,806 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cqchasingdream.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.