Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for iM전략 김준영

Channel

iM전략 김준영

@crazyecon

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,479subscribers

+68 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001550266895
TypeChannel
Username@crazyecon
Created14 July 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/crazyecon

Growth

7,4117,4797,4457 August 2026 — 7,411 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,414 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,415 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,422 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,421 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,428 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,478 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,472 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,465 subscribers4 September 2026 — 7,460 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,479 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 34 days, net +68. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,401–7,489 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 19:007,479+19
4 Sept 2026, 10:217,460-5
31 Aug 2026, 13:037,465-7
28 Aug 2026, 03:437,472-6
24 Aug 2026, 22:057,478+50
20 Aug 2026, 23:147,428+7
17 Aug 2026, 22:057,421-1
14 Aug 2026, 20:167,422+7
11 Aug 2026, 04:047,415+1
7 Aug 2026, 22:587,414+3
7 Aug 2026, 05:167,411first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 10 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.0%
avg views ÷ 7,479 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,590
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.181%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held32 (10 June 202628 August 2026)
Views total21,550
Reactions total39
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 22:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

215 reactions across 32 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9845.6%
👍5425.1%
😱177.91%
😭156.98%
🔥83.72%
🗿83.72%
52.33%
🤬41.86%
🎅31.40%
10.465%
🍾10.465%
😈10.465%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 215 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 14:06 UTC≈1,930 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026

FED'S WARSH - MUST BE CONFIDENT UNDERLYING INFLATION IS MOVING TO OBJECTIVE, OR 'WE HAVE WORK TO DO' - FED'S 2% PCE TARGET IS FIRM AND FIXED TARGET; IT IS FED’S JOB TO DELIVER STABLE PRICES - CONSUMER SPENDING HEALTHY, LABOR MARKETS STABLE - NUMBERS 'MORE CONCERNING' ON PRICE STABILITY - SUMMER INFLATION DATA WAS BETTER THAN EXPECTED, DOESN'T THINK UNDERLYING TRENDS HAVE MEANINGFULLY CHANGED - AT JULY MEETING,

🗿6

27 Aug 2026, 00:53 UTC≈1,080 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026

한은, 25bp 인상 내년 성장률 2.9% - 원화 절상이 가속화되는 것인지 지켜볼 필요 - 내년 수출주 전망치 하향 가능성(네덜란드 병) https://newsmailer.einfomax.co.kr/view/content/AKR20260827045900002

👍6🤬1

23 Aug 2026, 22:15 UTC≈6,710 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026

[iM증권 김준영] [주식전략] ★ 종목 장세와 계절성 ▶️ 전자/닉스 쏠림은 지속되기 어려움, 확산 뷰 유지 - 하이닉스 주주환원 발표(62영업일간 40조 규모 자사주 매입)로 전자/닉스 쏠림 전개. 삼성전자는 90~110조원 주주환원 발표했으나 시장 반응은 실망 - 미국에서도 AI 관련주 주가 흐름 강하지 않음. 반도체 쏠림 수급은 지속되기 어렵다는 판단 - 기존 확산 지속 뷰 유지. 반도체 이외 섹터·종목의 흐름은 상반기와 다를 것 - 전자/닉스가 쉬는 구간에서 오히려 종목 단 시세가 강한 종목들이 계속 확인될 것 ▶️ 계절성도 지수보다 종목장을 시사 - VIX는 9~11월 상승하는 계절성. 선거 시즌과 맞물려 패턴 뚜렷 - 나스닥과 코스피 모두 지난 10년간 9월 성과가 최저. 나스닥의 계절성이 특히 선명 - 반면 고베타 롱숏 지수

4👍2

19 Aug 2026, 23:43 UTC≈7,430 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026

베센트 바이백 코멘트 - iM 김준영 - 유동성이 부족한 비지표물 사서 지표물로 바꿔주는 것 - 만기는 비슷한데 비지표는 거래도 잘 안되고 저렴함 - 그 물건들을 거래가 잘되는 지표로 바꿔주겠다는 것 - 비지표를 지표로 바꾸는 것이지 채권 총발행량에 변화는 크게 없음 - 다만 시장이 부담해야하는 듀레이션은 줄어들 수 있음 (단기로 조달해서 장기를 산다면) -> 이 부분이 가장 긍정적. 10년대 operation twist로 비유하는 대목. - 채권 발행에 영향을 주려면 재무부가 발행을 줄여야함 - 혹은 채권 금리가 낮아지려면 인플레가 완화되어야함 - 당장 둘다 베센트가 할 수 있는건 크게 없음 - 그냥 최대한 시장에 윤활유를 뿌려 잘 굴러갈 수 있게 만들어주는 수 밖에 없음 FIMA 레포와 JPY - 일본이 미국채 담보로 자금을 600억

6🗿2

18 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC≈1,720 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

개인의 수급이 꼬여있습니다 해당 날짜의 코스피 종가 기준 순매수를 집계한거라 변동성이 컸던 7월을 감안하면 정확하게 딱 맞아떨어지진 않겠다만... 7,000pt 위부터 나올 물량이 많다는건 맞는거 같습니다

1

17 Aug 2026, 22:44 UTC≈2,680 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026

[iM증권 김준영] [주식전략] ★ 주식하기 딱 좋은 날씨 ▶️ 골디락스 재확인, 지표 둔화가 오히려 우호적으로 해석되는 국면 - 글로벌 ESI 플러스권 유지, ISI는 0 부근. 경기는 예상보다 양호하고 인플레는 예상 범위 내. 유가 배럴당 80불 전후로 중동 리스크만 통제되면 골디락스 지속 가능. - 7월 비농업 -2.3만개, 소매판매 전월비 -0.6%(예상 +0.1%)로 하회. 9월 FOMC 동결 시 연내 동결 경로 유력. 10월은 중간선거 앞두고 인상 명분 부족, 12월도 현 지표 흐름상 동결 가능성 우위. - 잉여 유동성 증가 지속, 블룸버그 금융환경지수 완화적 영역 진입. 9개월 선행한 잉여유동성 경로는 ISM PMI 개선 시사. - 장단기 역전 경로 소멸, 구리/금 비율은 3월 이후 상승하며 AI 투자 프록시로 전환. ▶️ 지

10👍1

9 Aug 2026, 22:44 UTC≈12,300 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026

[iM증권 김준영] [주식전략] ★ 반도체가 떠난 빈자리 ▶️ 반도체는 무겁고, 나머지는 살아나는 중 - 코스피 6월 말 조정 이후 6,000pt대 횡보. 반도체 반등 부재로 7,000pt 아래 갇힌 국면. - 삼성전자+SK하이닉스 합산 비중 47%대로 하락했으나 여전히 절반 수준. 반도체 섹터 전체는 5월 초 이후 코스피의 절반 이상 여전히 유지. - 시장 전반의 이익수정비율은 2분기부터 반등해 21년 5월 이후 최고. 온기 확산은 이미 진행 중 ▶️ 2분기 서프라이즈 비율 상단, 확산의 토대 - 방산 조선 증권 건설 등 주요 섹터에서 예상치 상회 빈도 증가. 발표 기업 기준 2분기 서프라이즈 비율 상단 수준. - 영업이익 추정치 5% 이상 상회 기업 비중은 21년 1분기 이후 최고치. - 이익수정비율과 서프라이즈 비율 동시 고점권. 지

6

7 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC≈6,590 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

5월, 6월 지표 모두 각각 66k, 37k 하향조정

👍4

7 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC≈6,710 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

NFP 하락은 정부 일자리에서 53k 감소 월드컵 수혜가 2달 연속 사라진건지 레저접객에서 40k 감소

👍5

7 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC≈6,200 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

- 경제활동참가율 하락 - 취업자보다 실업자 감소가 컸음

🎅3👍1

7 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC≈4,270 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026

달러 약세, 미국채 강세, 주식 중립(?) -> 소폭 강세

2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @crazyecon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“iM전략 김준영” (@crazyecon), 7,479 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crazyecon.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.