Channel
@creatoressa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
738subscribers
+84 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001673254329 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @creatoressa |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/creatoressa |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:16 | 738 | +28 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 710 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 709 | +54 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 655 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 654 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:49 | 654 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
398 reactions across 8 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 84 | 21.1% | |
| custom 5368341079957462772 | 74 | 18.6% | |
| 💅 | 59 | 14.8% | |
| 🔥 | 49 | 12.3% | |
| 💋 | 42 | 10.6% | |
| 🤩 | 32 | 8.04% | |
| custom 5359290376978969713 | 25 | 6.28% | |
| 🤨 | 24 | 6.03% | |
| 💔 | 7 | 1.76% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 0.503% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 398 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @creatoressa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Завтра вернусь с новым охуенным выпуском журнала! 👛 Расскажу, как формируется наше восприятие, что красиво и креативно, а что нет 😱
🔥20custom 536834107995746277210custom 53592903769789697135
Video message, posted without a caption
😁13💅12custom 53592903769789697135
Победа недостатков Сегодня пришлось лететь «Победой». Как девушка с ростом 1,81 всей душой ненавижу эту авиакомпанию: коленки не влазят в проём, шмотки — в ручную кладь. Маркетолог, начитавшийся честных отзывов в соцсетях, решил обыграть недостатки компании. И вот уже не людоедские условия перелёта, а забота об осанке и забытых вещах. Не дополнительный заработок на ручной клади — экономия места! Я всё равно от над…
🤨24🔥10😁7🍾2
Outfit so iconic you don’t even need to see the face 👛 Это довольно распространённый тренд в англоязычном твиттере: по 4 картинкам люди понимают, о ком идёт речь. Так и работают визуальные хуки в брендинге: они цепляют внимание и подсказывают мозгу имя или название за доли секунды. Маркетингу неважно, кто вы: человек или целая компания — брендинг для всех работает одинаково ⚫️ Сегодня посмотрите на примеры визуал…
custom 536834107995746277226🤩16💅12custom 53592903769789697132
Нишевый + креативный способ намекнуть коллегам, что вам не нравится их обед 👛 Да, я создала статью на википедии. Да, я зассала скинуть её в общую беседу. Да, я не скинула и мем тоже. Но может, кто-то из вас более смелый, чем я… Хештег трудности корпоративного мира 🙂
😁27💅15custom 536834107995746277210
Единственный вывод, который вы должны были сделать:
😁37💅20💋12🔥5custom 53683410799574627721
Если бы я была Кэрри Брэдшоу, я бы вела заметку под названием "Checks and the City" 👛 Потому что я могу вечно говорить о чеках, зарплатах, грейдах и работе. Заметка, как я в очередной раз возненавидела капитализм. Или как соевая либераха познала реальность. Называйте, как нравится. Главное — читайте колонку 👛
💋30🤩16custom 535929037697896971313🔥4custom 53683410799574627721
Выпуск №9 Читайте в свежем номере: 🔴вы в депрессии, 🔴что это значит для вашего творчества, 🔴и почему вы будете менее продуктивны, чем коллеги без депрессии (нет, вы не ленивая и не бесталанная). Приятного чтения! 👛
custom 536834107995746277226🔥10💔7
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @creatoressa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Журнал «Да мне по#%й»” (@creatoressa), 738 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/creatoressa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.