Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for – ˖° jᥙ᥉t ᥴrᥱρρ𐔖ᥴhᥱk ⊹ ࣪ ˖

Channel

– ˖° jᥙ᥉t ᥴrᥱρρ𐔖ᥴhᥱk ⊹ ࣪ ˖

@crepp0chek

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

919subscribers

+465 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004428765143
TypeChannel
Username@crepp0chek
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 24 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded26 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/crepp0chek

Growth

454919686.526 August 2026 — 454 subscribers26 August 2026 — 454 subscribers26 August 2026 — 477 subscribers2 September 2026 — 819 subscribers11 September 2026 — 919 subscribers26 August 202611 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 17 days, net +465. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 384–989 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 18:21919+100
2 Sept 2026, 13:14819+342
26 Aug 2026, 20:44477+23
26 Aug 2026, 02:00454no change
26 Aug 2026, 01:46454first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 24 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.4%
avg views ÷ 919 subscribers
Avg views / post
270
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
26.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held16 (24 August 202625 August 2026)
Views total4,055
Reactions total1,058
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Aug 2026, 02:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,058 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 520427950541325335853850.9%
custom 520421490051518863922020.8%
custom 52041843160530702361059.92%
custom 5199852747045777735524.91%
custom 5296425151120839714484.54%
custom 5197371806431886237353.31%
custom 5199964587994163671272.55%
custom 5296540144575222856252.36%
custom 520402546239266342440.378%
custom 519943095978247080520.189%
custom 520399297096507138920.189%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,058 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 21:36 UTC148 views77 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

честно, заебали уже эти люди с аргументом «млм ради млм», пусть пойдут повесятся хз

custom 520418431605307023649custom 520427950541325335812custom 52965401445752228568custom 51998527470457777352custom 52040254623926634242custom 52042149005151886392custom 51999645879941636711custom 52964251511208397141

Signed – ₊ ˚ 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑘 ˚₊✧

25 Aug 2026, 18:54 UTC228 views58 reactionsread 26 August 2026

– йоу подписота, 8 часть вышла, поэтому давайте там, идите смотрите 🦴 как обычно жду ваших отзывов в коммах

custom 520427950541325335837custom 52041843160530702367custom 52042149005151886395custom 52964251511208397143custom 51973718064318862372custom 51998527470457777352custom 51999645879941636712

Signed – ₊ ˚ 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑘 ˚₊✧

25 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC231 views41 reactionsread 26 August 2026

ЭТО ШИКАРНО БОЖЕ, почему анонимно

custom 520427950541325335831custom 52041843160530702364custom 52042149005151886393custom 52965401445752228562custom 51999645879941636711

Signed – ₊ ˚ 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑘 ˚₊✧

25 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC234 views55 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnonAskBotPhoto

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Я не сдержалась и нарисовала вам артик к вашей ау оч люблю ваше творчество спасибо вам вы очень крутая :> ⬅️ Свайпни для ответа.

custom 520427950541325335835custom 520421490051518863911custom 52964251511208397144custom 51973718064318862373custom 51998527470457777351custom 52041843160530702361

Signed – ₊ ˚ 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑘 ˚₊✧

25 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC248 views38 reactionsread 26 August 2026

я обязана была это скинуть именно сейчас

custom 519985274704577773526custom 52964251511208397147custom 52041843160530702362custom 51999645879941636711custom 52042149005151886391custom 52965401445752228561

Signed – ₊ ˚ 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑘 ˚₊✧

25 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC248 views41 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnonAskBotPhoto

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Привет я сахарный сиксевен ⬅️ Свайпни для ответа.

custom 520427950541325335826custom 52042149005151886397custom 52964251511208397144custom 51973718064318862372custom 51994309597824708051custom 52041843160530702361

Signed – ₊ ˚ 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑘 ˚₊✧

25 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC261 views68 reactionsread 26 August 2026

– ребятки, вышла первая часть по яндере зарисовке, кто хочет - бегите читать как всегда жду мнений в коммах 🤩🤩

custom 520421490051518863949custom 52042795054132533589custom 51998527470457777357custom 52964251511208397142custom 52041843160530702361

Signed – ₊ ˚ 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑘 ˚₊✧

25 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC276 views70 reactionsread 26 August 2026

СУКА ПРИСЫЛАЙТЕ МНЕ ТАКОЕ ЧАЩЕ, я потом сделаю отдельную подборку с такими мемами

custom 520427950541325335842custom 520421490051518863911custom 51973718064318862379custom 51999645879941636716custom 52041843160530702362

Signed – ₊ ˚ 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑘 ˚₊✧

25 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC277 views78 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnonAskBotPhoto

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! ⬅️ Свайпни для ответа.

custom 520427950541325335851custom 520421490051518863913custom 52964251511208397145custom 52965401445752228565custom 51999645879941636712custom 52040254623926634242

Signed – ₊ ˚ 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑘 ˚₊✧

25 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC275 views70 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnonAskBotPhoto

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Это будет с вами если в вашей зарисовке по русреал будет пиздец ⬅️ Свайпни для ответа.

custom 520427950541325335847custom 520421490051518863910custom 52965401445752228566custom 52964251511208397143custom 51999645879941636712custom 52041843160530702362

Signed – ₊ ˚ 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑘 ˚₊✧

25 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC308 views136 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

– ну вот, готово. ну не знаю, вроде норм напишите как вам в коммы, как по мне не оч вышло, но учитывая, что в зарисовках главное не обложка, то сойдет

custom 520427950541325335884custom 520421490051518863923custom 520418431605307023617custom 51973718064318862374custom 51999645879941636714custom 52964251511208397142custom 51994309597824708051custom 52965401445752228561

Signed – ₊ ˚ 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑘 ˚₊✧

25 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC312 views97 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

ладно признаюсь зарисовка будет не яндере а бдсм

custom 520427950541325335858custom 520421490051518863919custom 51998527470457777359custom 52041843160530702365custom 51973718064318862372custom 51999645879941636712custom 52964251511208397142

Signed – ₊ ˚ 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑘 ˚₊✧

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @crepp0chek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“– ˖° jᥙ᥉t ᥴrᥱρρ𐔖ᥴhᥱk ⊹ ࣪ ˖” (@crepp0chek), 919 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crepp0chek.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.