Channel
@crindgedead
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
378subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001963742148 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crindgedead |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crindgedead |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 378 | -3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:38 | 381 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 380 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 384 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 382 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 381 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 381 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
205 reactions across 6 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥰 | 59 | 28.8% | |
| 💋 | 56 | 27.3% | |
| custom 5345965030489726274 | 41 | 20.0% | |
| 💘 | 21 | 10.2% | |
| custom 5345826208556787012 | 15 | 7.32% | |
| custom 5348090317746740635 | 10 | 4.88% | |
| custom 5343577299256091967 | 2 | 0.976% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.488% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 205 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Казнить нельзя помиловать 🚫 или история о том, как я пыталась показать, что подружилась с палитрой теней «Сияющая Виверна болот» от Тамми Танука, собственно, пока что только до: 🥹👍🏻 Хотя бы на реснички поглядите, они сюда прекрасно вписались 🤣 Пойду дальше учиться тени тушевать 🥲✌ #макияжусь@cringedead
🥰22💋9💘9
легкий повседневный макияж на выгул 😙😙 Использовала палитру: Narimi “Taste of pumpkin” Раз в год и у Narimi бывают очень хорошие приятно тянущиеся и не сыпучие матовые, к которым, если и есть вопросы, то не значительные. Этой палитрой я довольна, не смотря на то, что пастель тускнеет, и есть жирноватые сияшки, это уже дело привычное 😭 #макияжусь@cringedead
🥰16💋9💘5custom 53435772992560919672
Видео рождалось очень и очень долго 🥺 На меня нахлынули комментарии в китайской соц.сети о моей «странной», «некрасивой» коже и я некоторое сидела и переваривала :) Дело в том, что я активно лечусь на системных ретиноидах и мною было принято решение, снимать видео вообще без фильтров сглаживания и всякого прочего, что конечно же многим не нравится, но ничего, я от своего отходить не планирую 😇 Всем желаю крепкого …
💋21custom 534582620855678701212custom 53459650304897262748
🕺Что-то потащило меня в фиолетовые сияшки, и внезапно первое, что мне попалось под руку при поисках нужных сиях, были эти красавцы: 1. Supernova Remnant — Terra Moons 2. Stellar siren — Terra Moons 3. Playful — Touch of glam 4. Purrfect — Touch of glam (Поняла, что забыла этого бедолагу на фото, он красуется отдельно. Фото: 1-3 жесткий свет 4 — мягкий свет #свотчное@cringedead
🥰14💘3💋2
Пока я монтирую новое видео, покажу отработку формы, это не полноценный макияж, а так, мимолетное вдохновение и доработка на мой лад макияжа Аннушки И я к вам с вопросом, а чтобы вы хотели видеть в блоге? Чувствую, что во время творческого простоя, когда случается макияжный нестояк, всё равно хочу быть полезной, и вот думаю как Лайфхаки? Подборки? Разговорные видео? Какие-то мысли о бьюти? Находки китайских бренд…
💋15custom 534596503048972627411🥰7custom 53458262085567870123💔1
Adept cosmetics “Sapphire Selene” Палитра оооочень красивая, вполне себе родственник небезизвестного “Cyborg” от Adept. Сияшки носятся не жирные и носятся без клея, но есть одна хлопушковидная(обвела на фото), с ней могут быть проблемы, если перебрать, то веко скукожит только так. Матовые оттенки очень приятные, легко уводятся в кожу, хоть и могут пылить. Продолжу пользоваться палеткой, для более развернутого мне…
custom 534596503048972627422custom 534809031774674063510💘4
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @crindgedead. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“cringe dead 🖖🏻” (@crindgedead), 378 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crindgedead.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.