Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for M07 Updates 🤝 Sergi Cristóbal Jané

Channel

M07 Updates 🤝 Sergi Cristóbal Jané

@cristobaljane

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

334subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001055485340
TypeChannel
Username@cristobaljane
DescriptionIn this channel you will find all the articles that I'm sharing and analysis that I'm publishing about the latest events. A corner about International Relations, OSINT, and intel updates.
CreatedBetween 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded2 September 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/cristobaljane

Growth

3342 Sept 2026, 02:15 — 334 subscribers2 Sept 2026, 02:30 — 334 subscribers2 Sept 2026, 02:152 Sept 2026, 02:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 333–335 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 02:30334no change
2 Sept 2026, 02:15334first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 29 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.25%
avg views ÷ 334 subscribers
Avg views / post
27.6
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held16 (29 August 20261 September 2026)
Views total441
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 02:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
954
Videos
427
Links
6,840

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 22:09 UTC3 viewsread 2 September 2026

🔎 The officials did not detail the type of equipment COSCO ships were allegedly using, but said they were "sophisticated signals intelligence collection" platforms, not routine communications hardware. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/chinese-shipper-cosco-collects-intel-beijing-with-concealed-equipment-us-2026-09-01/

Signed Sergi Cristóbal

1 Sept 2026, 15:17 UTC21 viewsread 2 September 2026

🇩🇪 Explosive devices have been found at a substation in Brandenburg, according to the police there was also a detonation, but there is no danger. The operator of the plant speaks of an "attack". Original source: https://www.spiegel.de/panorama/turnow-preilack-polizei-findet-sprengvorrichtungen-an-umspannwerk-in-brandenburg-a-7b5af2fb-df9a-451a-88a9-1fa2a948e154?sara_ref=re-so-app-sh

Signed Sergi Cristóbal

1 Sept 2026, 15:03 UTC21 viewsread 2 September 2026

You can all see how disturbing the signals are coming from Ukraine, how disturbing are the signals that, for example, were behind the CIA chief's visit to Russia. There are very, very many signs that Russia is changing its strategy and intensifying its activities, including terrorist and sabotage activities 🔎 https://radio.lublin.pl/2026/09/minister-marcin-kierwinski-pozary-w-lublinie-i-skarzysku-kamiennej-to-dwa-od

Signed Sergi Cristóbal

1 Sept 2026, 14:50 UTC21 viewsread 2 September 2026

📄 The main mistake that Europe can make now is to prepare for Russian tactics, which Ukraine saw two or three years ago or sees today. The traditional military procurement cycle lasts for years. The adaptation cycle of unmanned systems on the Ukrainian front is sometimes measured in months. Therefore, a system that today looks optimal against a slow drone, at the time of mass entry into the troops may already corresp

Signed Sergi Cristóbal

1 Sept 2026, 00:21 UTC29 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

I've been closely following Novorossiysk events for more than a year. At this point, I only want to see the Russian Black Sea Fleet decimated. ⏺ Source 1: https://t.me/exilenova_plus/30167 ⏺ Source 2: https://www.shutterstock.com/video/clip-1104349817-novorossiysk-russia-port-night-viewed-above-sweeping?dd_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F

Signed Sergi Cristóbal

31 Aug 2026, 22:27 UTC27 viewsread 2 September 2026

🇵🇱 A fire broke out overnight at the WB Electronics plant. This company produces parts for drones used by the Polish and Ukrainian armies. According to unofficial reports, surveillance footage captured a masked man on the factory premises. Authorities are not ruling out the possibility of arson. The Internal Security Agency is working on the scene. "We are taking this matter extremely seriously," said a spokesman for

Signed Sergi Cristóbal

31 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC28 viewsread 2 September 2026

I'm not used to sharing mass media articles focused on Russia’s war of aggression, but my personal interpretation couldn’t be clearer: this piece was published to test the waters on hybrid threats and scenarios that could be framed as a “victory” for Putin’s regime. At this point, there is nothing new since 2022. The hybrid threat remains a critical issue for allied countries. ⏺ Source: https://www.economist.com/eur

Signed Sergi Cristóbal

31 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC27 viewsread 2 September 2026

📄 The primary objective of the visit is highly likely to have been deterrence signalling, specifically cautioning Moscow against further escalation targeting NATO’s eastern flank particularly the Baltic states amid Russia’s rising risk tolerance for hybrid and cyber activity against critical infrastructure. https://stjamesbriefingroom.substack.com/p/cia-directors-unannounced-moscow

Signed Sergi Cristóbal

31 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC26 viewsread 2 September 2026

📄 Ja teniu el balanç d’agost de 2026 de les principals activitats ucraïneses. Vaig crear aquesta newsletter per combatre, en el seu moment, l’elevada quantitat d’elements prorussos que campen per la política catalana (algun dia certs tuitaires hem de parlar d’això, especialment sobre determinat diputat que em va dir nazi xd) i vaig acabar derivant en una newsletter focalitzada en atacs amb drons, míssils i activitat

Signed Sergi Cristóbal

31 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC25 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

An unspecified radar was destroyed in Bryansk Oblast🔎 ⏺ Source: https://t.me/GeneralStaffZSU/42080

Signed Sergi Cristóbal

31 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC31 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

📣 I've updated my BY-UKR-RU map and added the latest events, as well as Belarus military infrastructure near the Ukrainian border. During this week, I will also add the accurate geolocation of UAV signal relays, because some published geolocations don't match the Cellmapper app geolocations. https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1f_HqpWkqrOpPXX_Rc_-C_czEaBfZHZQ&ll=52.19999208526912%2C31.08298667979977&z=8

Signed Sergi Cristóbal

31 Aug 2026, 06:35 UTC33 viewsread 2 September 2026

🇺🇦 Pels que encara seguim el que passa a Ucraïna. Aquest és el balanç de la setmana que ahir vam tancar: 213 atacs amb drons contra objectius estratègics 🛩 35 bombardejos estratègics 🔫 16 accions partisanes 🔫🔫🔥🛤🔪

Signed Sergi Cristóbal

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @cristobaljane. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

gencat
@gencat · 36,067
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“M07 Updates 🤝 Sergi Cristóbal Jané” (@cristobaljane), 334 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cristobaljane.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.