Channel
@crochetrat
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
250subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002471630521 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crochetrat |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crochetrat |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:36 | 250 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 249 | +5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 244 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 243 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 243 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
160 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 63 | 39.4% | |
| custom 5253491296525382010 | 59 | 36.9% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 7.50% | |
| custom 5269359375323006090 | 7 | 4.38% | |
| custom 5253929443319119025 | 6 | 3.75% | |
| 🤝 | 6 | 3.75% | |
| custom 5253481070208250178 | 4 | 2.50% | |
| custom 5267370371673259172 | 3 | 1.88% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 160 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
И новенькое пока не знаю что. Печаталось 1 деталью (ни один принтер, вроде, не пострадал), внутри полое, на просвет виден городок
custom 525349129652538201012❤6custom 52693593753230060906custom 52534810702082501784
Принято, значит интерес есть) Поизучаем ещё, вернемся с инфой через пару дней
❤2custom 52693593753230060901
В опрос много текста не влезет, поэтому тут чуть подробнее Это пока идея в порядке бреда, на стадии обсуждения. Сейчас все зависит от того, насколько оно вообще надо. Места перспективные есть. В зависимости от количества людей это может быть комната в антикафе, лофт или вообще мини антикинотеатр. Но последнее, скорее, утопия Можно затариться чокопаями, печеньками и чаем; подготовить субтитры к музыкальной части и п…
❤9
Внезапный опрос Многим не удалось поймать билет на квартирник 23 августа. Есть идея - собраться в этот день фандомной компанией, арендовать какое-то местечко и посмотреть запись прошлогоднего квартирника. Плюшки и тд прилагаются Что думаете?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Поставила на печать первый прототип нового "гаджета". Решила по приколу докопаться до Чата с преобразованием текстуры в бесшовную. Офигела, что у него получилось, причем довольно хорошо 😳
custom 525349129652538201013
Вот такие ребята получились. Мне все еще нравится двусторонний вариант, но эти тоже выглядят, вроде, неплохо
custom 525349129652538201013custom 52539294433191190255
Спасибо за ответы. Подождем, может ещё голоса будут. Для тех, кто совсем не видит сообщение - продублировала содержимое в комментариях к посту. Они, теоретически, все равно должны быть доступны. Пните, пожалуйста, если нет А пока печатается новая версия стакана, поделюсь радостью. Приехали, наконец, с 7 круга ада таможни наушники 🥹 Как мало человеку нужно для счастья - послушать музыку в обоих ушах после двухнедельн…
custom 525349129652538201016custom 52673703716732591723
Так, соц опрос. Что думаете насчет такого оформления?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Posted without readable text
custom 52534912965253820105
Выползла сегодня на Книгу. Надеюсь, все будет нормально. В этот раз без брелка. Не было сил этим заниматься Плюсы дня: пугающе повезло с автобусом. Минусы: не повезло с дорогой и грустно было ехать со сломанными наушниками
🔥12🤝6custom 52539294433191190251
*Замоделила и напечатала мини-декорацию* *Рекомендации Пинтереста на следующий день* Постараюсь возвращаться потихоньку в "рабочий ритм". Человек, которому я торчу аудио Тесея Толстокорова уже месяц - прости 🥹 Пока это первый приоритет
❤23
С интерактивом удочку закинули, посмотрим, что выйдет. А пока - штука (это слово упоминается в канале уже 111 раз)) Короче, мне нужна была мусорка для пластика. Естественно, первая мысль - нужно напечатать. Но просто стоковая ваза - это же не интересно и не тематично. Была мысля сделать любимый Брутовский красный предмет, но он получился бы слишком пузатым. Лезу в фотоальбомы в поисках того, что ещё можно спиратить …
❤23
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @crochetrat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Внезапный опрос Многим не удалось поймать билет на квартирник 23 августа. Есть идея - собраться в этот день фандомной компанией, арендовать какое-то местечко и посмотреть запись прошлогоднего квартирника. Плюшки и тд прилагаются Что думаете?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Так, соц опрос. Что думаете насчет такого оформления?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Причудливая рукодельня” (@crochetrat), 250 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crochetrat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.