28 measurements spanning 27 days, net -459. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,249–11,846 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Sept 2026, 23:57
11,318
-15
2 Sept 2026, 16:44
11,333
-21
1 Sept 2026, 12:07
11,354
-17
31 Aug 2026, 14:24
11,371
-15
30 Aug 2026, 15:25
11,386
-9
29 Aug 2026, 18:44
11,395
-7
28 Aug 2026, 22:07
11,402
-38
27 Aug 2026, 18:47
11,440
-10
26 Aug 2026, 20:24
11,450
-15
25 Aug 2026, 19:54
11,465
-15
24 Aug 2026, 21:45
11,480
-30
23 Aug 2026, 07:14
11,510
-18
21 Aug 2026, 17:24
11,528
-24
20 Aug 2026, 15:08
11,552
-18
19 Aug 2026, 18:38
11,570
-17
18 Aug 2026, 18:03
11,587
-15
17 Aug 2026, 17:35
11,602
-15
16 Aug 2026, 15:45
11,617
-24
14 Aug 2026, 22:48
11,641
-19
13 Aug 2026, 15:48
11,660
first reading
Engagement
60 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.97%
avg views ÷ 11,318 subscribers
Avg views / post
336
51 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.863%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
52
of 60 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 33 of 51 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
60 (2 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
17,160
Reactions total
99
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 00:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
124 reactions across 39 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
75
60.5%
❤
32
25.8%
🔥
13
10.5%
🐳
1
0.806%
👎
1
0.806%
👏
1
0.806%
🤔
1
0.806%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀Доброе утро и мы в нашем закрыто-открытом чате начали уже трейдить. Две сделки уже в работе.
Похвастаюсь вам, вчерашними нашими похождениями по монете $BTR с теми кто был в чате вчера. Все скрины исключительно от участников, и один мой. Мы вчера прокатились на этом токене 3 раза и все были удачными по профиту.
📍📍📍 Напоминаю, вход в чат через бота @bitunix_batya_bot абсолютно бесплатный. надо лишь заргеать акк на б…
🪙Ну и раз такая пляска, то делаем совместо с 👍 Bitunix эксклюзивную компанию!
Это все таже биржа без КУС и ВПН, которая активно развивается! И которая вобрала в себя все лучшее от грандов рынка (удобство, скорость работы, гарантии вкладов, работу без верификации, табун токенов и монет на любой вкус и мизерные комиссии).
Специально для вас я выбил жирную промоакцию, где просто за дееозит вы получаете фьючерсные бону…
Вчера вам писал и позавчера и вообще уже пару недель пишу, а вы не реагируете. Получается деньги просто проходят мимо вас по соседней улице…
Вот утренний вход в сделку и результаты мои и ребят из закрытого приватного чата (он бесплатный есси шо), надо только зайти через бота @bitunix_batya_bot и зарегать себе акк на бирже 👍 Bitunix, где нет даже KYC и куча плюшек для вновь зашедших. То есть не надо даже деп делать…
…
Всем привет.
Немного пропал из контекста соцсетей. Просто занимался заработком бабла на фьючах, геймефай и закупе спотового портфеля.
Теперь по очереди.
• Что происходит в нашем закрытом чате по трейдингу - немного на скринах. Напоминаю, вход бесплатный - @bitunix_batya_bot , торгуем по-разному и на разных биржах, но стараемся по итогу быть в «+». Рекомендую торговать на самой «вкусной» на сейчас - 👍 Bitunix, но вы…
🔥🔥🔥 Хочу с вами обсудить «порядочность» трейдеров, которых целый табун и вы сможете их найти на просторах тг сотни, если не тысячи.
Даю вам один пример из десятков, которые лично я пробовал, следил и пытался повторить. Вот реально пытался и даже жене делал акк, чтобы она как левый челвоек качнула себе балик, по этим беспроигрышным сетапам.
Я опущу тот момент, что ВСЕГДА после их сообщения о входе в сделку, цена чу…
Ну а пока суть до дела, даю вам часть сделок, которые мы совершили за последние пару дней в нашем закрытом чате.
Кста, доступ в него сейчас не просто бесплатный, а еще и халявный по требованиям, просто надо акк зарегать на бирже, на которой собственно мы и торгуем там - 👍 Bitunix
📍Доступ в закрытый чат по трейдингу через бота - @bitunix_batya_bot
Не забывайте выполнять требования на самой биржи по выполнению квест…
➡️ AMA HUB — сегодня запустили программу валидаторов. То есть движуха идет полным ходом и пропускать такое точно нельзя. Поэтому кто еще не зашел, идем 👇👇👇
ПОСТ с полным разбором и инструкций.
Выглядит все очень и очень солидно. Абузить я эту историю не буду, но максимально сделаю упор на основной аккаунт, что вам и рекомендую сделать.
Подробности по программе валидаторов в твиттере - тыц или сразу на сайте валид…
Так как для вас актуальны фьючи, по крайней мере так вы голосуете. Решил сделать для вас подарок.
📍📍📍Доступ в закрытый чат по трейдингу через бота - @bitunix_batya_bot без обязательного депозита на биржу. То есть чтобы попасть в чат, вам надо лишь зарегестрироваться на крутейшей бирже 👍 Bitunix не требующей KYC , по моей реферальной ссылке - https://www.bitunix.com/ru-ru/activity/basic/1786951152?vipCode=qoBL и зайт…
Перевожу на важность исходя из ваших же голосов:
1. Дропы, тестнеты и халява.
2. Фьючи, сигналы и акции по биржам.
3. Альты, спот портфель и перспектива туземуна.
4. Игры с криптой (долгоиграющие пирамидосыя).
5. Места где дают %% за альту в портфеле.
Если хотите изменить порядок, то продолжайте голосовать, я периодически буду поглядывать туда. https://t.me/crypro_batya/4813
И да, по играм есть отдельный канал - ht…
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @crypro_batya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
То чувство, когда не понимаешь, что больше интересует находящихся в канале … Какой инфы давать больше?
Фьючи и сигналы по ним31%
Альты в спот портфель27%
Дропы подтвержденные и потенциальные45%
Игры и прочие «пирамидосики»22%
Где стейкать альту под %24%
Новости, обучение, бла-бла-бла16%
Побольше халявы31%
The shares total 196%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
RollerCoin 🎮 @RollerCoin_official · 59,697 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Крипто Батя” (@crypro_batya), 11,318 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypro_batya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.