Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto Horizon

Channel

Crypto Horizon

@crypt0_horizon

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

54,061subscribers

-5,376 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002288268983
TypeChannel
Username@crypt0_horizon
Description🔎 Explore the crypto space with the Crypto Horizon channel. 📰 The latest crypto market news is here.
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 October 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/crypt0_horizon

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

54,06159,43756,7497 August 2026 — 59,437 subscribers7 August 2026 — 59,437 subscribers8 August 2026 — 59,295 subscribers9 August 2026 — 59,159 subscribers10 August 2026 — 59,092 subscribers11 August 2026 — 58,975 subscribers12 August 2026 — 58,837 subscribers13 August 2026 — 58,768 subscribers14 August 2026 — 58,619 subscribers16 August 2026 — 58,483 subscribers17 August 2026 — 58,302 subscribers18 August 2026 — 58,211 subscribers19 August 2026 — 58,122 subscribers20 August 2026 — 58,030 subscribers21 August 2026 — 57,918 subscribers22 August 2026 — 57,799 subscribers24 August 2026 — 57,633 subscribers25 August 2026 — 57,533 subscribers26 August 2026 — 57,397 subscribers27 August 2026 — 57,342 subscribers28 August 2026 — 57,235 subscribers29 August 2026 — 57,147 subscribers30 August 2026 — 57,023 subscribers31 August 2026 — 56,941 subscribers1 September 2026 — 56,816 subscribers2 September 2026 — 56,730 subscribers4 September 2026 — 56,578 subscribers6 September 2026 — 56,394 subscribers9 September 2026 — 56,051 subscribers12 September 2026 — 55,874 subscribers13 September 2026 — 55,713 subscribers15 September 2026 — 55,560 subscribers17 September 2026 — 55,418 subscribers26 September 2026 — 54,680 subscribers4 October 2026 — 54,061 subscribers7 August 20264 October 2026
35 measurements spanning 58 days, net -5,376. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 53,255–60,243 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Oct 2026, 17:1954,061-619
26 Sept 2026, 17:4154,680-738
17 Sept 2026, 11:4055,418-142
15 Sept 2026, 11:4155,560-153
13 Sept 2026, 18:4155,713-161
12 Sept 2026, 00:4055,874-177
9 Sept 2026, 19:0256,051-343
6 Sept 2026, 14:0056,394-184
4 Sept 2026, 07:0256,578-152
2 Sept 2026, 20:1456,730-86
1 Sept 2026, 21:3556,816-125
31 Aug 2026, 19:0856,941-82
30 Aug 2026, 19:0457,023-124
29 Aug 2026, 20:4257,147-88
28 Aug 2026, 17:0557,235-107
27 Aug 2026, 17:3457,342-55
26 Aug 2026, 14:2357,397-136
25 Aug 2026, 11:3757,533-100
24 Aug 2026, 13:4357,633-166
22 Aug 2026, 21:2857,799first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 23 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 120 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.71%
avg views ÷ 54,061 subscribers
Avg views / post
926
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.594%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026
Posts held30 (23 January 2026 – 18 September 2026)
Views total1,851
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Oct 2026, 05:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
195
Videos
11
Links
71

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

915 reactions across 30 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤45749.9%
👍17419.0%
💯727.87%
🔥727.87%
🤝727.87%
😁222.40%
✍131.42%
😱60.656%
🥰50.546%
🆒40.437%
🌚40.437%
👏40.437%
👨‍💻40.437%
🤯30.328%
👻20.219%
🐳10.109%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 915 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Sept 2026, 18:22 UTC681 views6 reactionsread 5 October 2026

Jack Dorsey’s Block has applied for a federal banking charter — Builders Bank & Trust will handle asset custody and other trust services, including Bitcoin and stablecoins — The Block Block currently holds 9,117 BTC on its long-term balance sheet, while Dorsey is periodically named as one of the potential candidates for the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto.

❤2🔥2😁2

8 Sept 2026, 16:27 UTC≈1,170 views5 reactionsread 5 October 2026
Photo

The price of Zcash (ZEC), the largest privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has surpassed $1,000. Notably, the project’s legal office is located just one block away from CIA headquarters.

❤3👍1🤝1

25 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC≈1,690 views6 reactionsread 5 October 2026
Photo

Crypto just saw the largest liquidation event in history — CoinGlass data.

❤2👍2💯2

19 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC≈2,100 views8 reactionsread 5 October 2026
Photo

Michael Saylor said that Strategy plans to buy significantly more BTC in the near future.

❤3🔥3💯2

18 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC≈2,130 views3 reactionsread 5 October 2026
Photo

Off-balance-sheet investment commitments of U.S. AI-focused big tech companies, as reported by the WSJ. Google is the clear leader.

✍1💯1😁1

17 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC≈1,640 views7 reactionsread 5 October 2026
Photo

Trump and Melania’s memecoins, #TRUMP and #MELANIA, have plunged 98% and 99%, respectively, almost immediately after their launches. There is little hope of a recovery. Everyone who invested in these tokens lost money. The Trump family’s crypto earnings amounted to $1.4 billion in 2025. Critics in the U.S. call it perhaps the most blatant example of corruption in the history of American politics.

✍3💯2😱2

14 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC≈1,560 views7 reactionsread 5 October 2026
Photo

Whale activity in LINK has surged. Santiment reports that large holders continue to accumulate.

🤝3❤1👍1💯1🔥1

13 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC≈1,710 views7 reactionsread 5 October 2026
Photo

Fans of the Bollinger Bands indicator believe BTC is on the verge of an “explosive” move, similar to the one seen in October 2023. Many experts note that if Bitcoin’s four-year cycles are still intact, the start of a new three-year bull market could fall as early as October–December this year.

👍3🤝2❤1💯1

12 Aug 2026, 07:07 UTC≈1,530 views9 reactionsread 5 October 2026
Photo

Short-term holders have started aggressively selling BTC at a loss again. BTC reserves on Binance have begun rising sharply — historically bearish, as BTC may be moved to the exchange for subsequent selling.

👍4🔥2❤1💯1😁1

5 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC≈1,830 views9 reactionsread 5 October 2026
Photo

U.S. publicly traded companies now hold 1.24 million BTC—nearly 93% of all corporate Bitcoin holdings worldwide. Over the past year, they acquired an additional 510,000 BTC—more than three times the amount mined during the same period.

👍3💯2🤝2❤1😁1

3 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC≈1,770 views9 reactionsread 5 October 2026
Photo

Flows into spot Bitcoin ETFs remain stagnant, while BTC continues to trade within the $58,000–$70,000 range. The broader consensus remains unchanged: there are early signs that a market bottom may be forming, but a mass capitulation has yet to occur. As a result, the possibility of one final leg down toward the $40,000–$50,000 range still remains.

❤3🤝3👍2💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @crypt0_horizon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Horizon” (@crypt0_horizon), 54,061 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypt0_horizon.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.