Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto Analysis News

Channel

Crypto Analysis News

@crypto_analysis_news

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

22,854subscribers

-4,346 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001279556766
TypeChannel
Username@crypto_analysis_news
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 October 2026
Measurements held50
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/crypto_analysis_news

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

22,85427,20025,0277 August 2026 — 27,200 subscribers7 August 2026 — 27,200 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,113 subscribers9 August 2026 — 27,050 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,993 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,927 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,873 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,839 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,768 subscribers16 August 2026 — 26,674 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,591 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26,537 subscribers19 August 2026 — 26,474 subscribers20 August 2026 — 26,430 subscribers21 August 2026 — 26,376 subscribers23 August 2026 — 26,300 subscribers24 August 2026 — 26,219 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,149 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,099 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,070 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,031 subscribers29 August 2026 — 25,993 subscribers30 August 2026 — 25,911 subscribers31 August 2026 — 25,805 subscribers1 September 2026 — 25,736 subscribers2 September 2026 — 25,641 subscribers3 September 2026 — 25,587 subscribers5 September 2026 — 25,440 subscribers9 September 2026 — 25,126 subscribers11 September 2026 — 24,997 subscribers13 September 2026 — 24,928 subscribers14 September 2026 — 24,872 subscribers16 September 2026 — 24,803 subscribers19 September 2026 — 24,732 subscribers25 September 2026 — 24,484 subscribers4 October 2026 — 24,132 subscribers8 October 2026 — 23,944 subscribers13 October 2026 — 23,779 subscribers14 October 2026 — 23,727 subscribers15 October 2026 — 23,675 subscribers16 October 2026 — 23,582 subscribers17 October 2026 — 23,486 subscribers18 October 2026 — 23,401 subscribers19 October 2026 — 23,309 subscribers20 October 2026 — 23,288 subscribers21 October 2026 — 23,198 subscribers22 October 2026 — 23,102 subscribers23 October 2026 — 23,025 subscribers24 October 2026 — 22,940 subscribers25 October 2026 — 22,854 subscribers7 August 202625 October 2026
50 measurements spanning 80 days, net -4,346. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,202–27,852 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 50
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Oct 2026, 17:3122,854-86
24 Oct 2026, 18:1922,940-85
23 Oct 2026, 18:2723,025-77
22 Oct 2026, 16:2023,102-96
21 Oct 2026, 10:0723,198-90
20 Oct 2026, 06:4523,288-21
19 Oct 2026, 07:4623,309-92
18 Oct 2026, 09:3823,401-85
17 Oct 2026, 11:0623,486-96
16 Oct 2026, 13:2823,582-93
15 Oct 2026, 10:4123,675-52
14 Oct 2026, 14:0623,727-52
13 Oct 2026, 04:4023,779-165
8 Oct 2026, 18:5523,944-188
4 Oct 2026, 06:0024,132-352
25 Sept 2026, 13:5624,484-248
19 Sept 2026, 03:4124,732-71
16 Sept 2026, 18:1524,803-69
14 Sept 2026, 18:5724,872-56
13 Sept 2026, 09:0124,928first reading

Engagement

137 posts held, back to 3 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.6%
avg views ÷ 22,854 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,800
102 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.067%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
102
of 137 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 102 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 October 2026
Posts held137 (3 June 2026 – 24 October 2026)
Views total387,618
Reactions total32
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Oct 2026, 07:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
30s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

77 reactions across 33 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2937.7%
👍1722.1%
🔥1620.8%
👏1114.3%
💯45.19%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 137 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 137 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 24 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Oct 2026, 05:11 UTC658 viewsread 24 October 2026
Photo

📰 NEWS Netanyahu Requests Blockchain Plan to Counter Banking Sanctions Days before Israel's election, Prime Minister Netanyahu said he has asked for a blockchain plan in case banks are hit with sanctions. 💡 Why it matters A nation-state exploring crypto infrastructure to bypass potential banking sanctions could establish a precedent for sovereign sanctions evasion and reshape regulatory approaches to digital asset…

24 Oct 2026, 00:10 UTC≈1,620 viewsread 24 October 2026
Photo

🏛 REGULATION · USDT US senator probes Tether after reported deal with ex-Trump crypto adviser The Democratic ranking member of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations asked Paolo Ardoino for records related to a reported deal between Tether and Nxum. 📊 Market snapshot USDT $0.9987 ▲0.0% BTC $81,043 ▼0.2% ETH $2,383 ▼0.0% Updated 00:09 UTC 🔗 Sources: Cointelegraph · Decrypt · The Block #USDT #Tether …

23 Oct 2026, 15:18 UTC≈2,840 viewsread 24 October 2026
Photo

📰 NEWS · BTC Bitcoin Core Ends Bug Embargo as AI Rediscovers Flaws Bitcoin Core developers merged a policy change ending the months-long embargo for flaws that a chatbot could rediscover, following a summer in which AI found hundreds of such bugs. 💡 Why it matters The change accelerates disclosure of vulnerabilities that AI can easily find, reducing the window for exploitation and pressuring maintainers to patch f…

23 Oct 2026, 10:16 UTC≈3,230 viewsread 24 October 2026
Photo

🏦 INSTITUTIONAL · RWA HSBC Launches HKD Stablecoin RedCoin for Retail Payments HSBC is rolling out RedCoin wallets to PayMe users, with plans to support tokenized investment subscriptions and expand into institutional uses. 💡 Why it matters A major global bank issuing a retail stablecoin bridges traditional finance with crypto infrastructure, potentially accelerating stablecoin adoption and enabling tokenized asse…

23 Oct 2026, 05:14 UTC≈3,560 viewsread 24 October 2026
Photo

📰 NEWS A16z is the latest VC giant to widen bets beyond crypto and into AI and emerging tech The venture investor behind early bets on Coinbase, Solana and Uniswap said is broadening its focus, joining other crypto investment firms looking beyond blockchain to artificial… 📊 Market snapshot SOL $104 ▼1.1% UNI $7.18 ▼0.2% BTC $81,703 ▼1.2% Updated 05:14 UTC 🔗 Sources: CoinDesk · Decrypt #News @crypto_analysis_new

23 Oct 2026, 00:11 UTC≈3,800 viewsread 24 October 2026
Photo

🏦 INSTITUTIONAL · BTC CryptoQuant CEO calls rising Bitcoin hashrate ‘indirect bullish signal’ from institutions Public miners backed by major TradFi players are coming back online, boosting Bitcoin’s hashrate, a positive sign for BTC’s fundamentals, according to CryptoQuant’s Ki Young Ju. 📊 Market snapshot BTC $81,167 ▼3.6% ETH $2,382 ▼3.9% Updated 00:11 UTC 🔗 Sources: Cointelegraph · Bitcoin.com #BTC #Bitcoin #…

22 Oct 2026, 15:19 UTC≈3,900 views1 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Photo

💰 MARKET · RWA SoFi unveils bank-issued tokenized deposit for yield-bearing crypto funds SoFi Bank launched SoFi Earn, a tokenized deposit paying 4.40% APY with FDIC coverage, allowing users to convert funds to stablecoins 24/7. 📊 Market snapshot BTC $81,551 ▼3.5% ETH $2,396 ▼4.3% Updated 15:18 UTC 🔗 Sources: Cointelegraph · Decrypt · The Block #RWA #DeFi #Stablecoins #Tokenization @crypto_analysis_news

👍1

22 Oct 2026, 12:37 UTC≈3,980 viewsread 24 October 2026
Photo

🏛 REGULATION · BTC Chinese Prosecutors Seek Confiscation of $5.1 Billion in Seized Bitcoin Chinese prosecutors are seeking to confiscate $5.1 billion in Bitcoin seized by the UK in the Qian case. A Tianjin court will hear the application after a six-month notice period, while a parallel fight over the coins continues in London. 💡 Why it matters This legal action affects the custody and ownership of a large volume …

22 Oct 2026, 05:12 UTC≈3,980 viewsread 24 October 2026
Photo

🏦 INSTITUTIONAL · ETF Grayscale Opens 10 Crypto ETFs to Investors, But There's a Catch Crypto investors holding substantial amounts of Bitcoin, Solana, or XRP now have another way to bring those holdings into traditional finance without selling their coins first. 📊 Market snapshot BTC $82,760 ▼0.1% SOL $105 ▼0.6% XRP $1.35 ▲1.0% Updated 05:12 UTC 🔗 Source: BeInCrypto #ETF #Institutional @crypto_analysis_news

22 Oct 2026, 00:09 UTC≈3,970 viewsread 24 October 2026
Photo

⚙️ TECH · ETH Fhenix Launches FHE Coprocessor Mainnet for Ethereum, Arbitrum Fhenix has launched its mainnet alongside its fully homomorphic encryption coprocessor, enabling smart contracts to execute directly on encrypted data. 💡 Why it matters This introduces fully homomorphic encryption as a live privacy primitive for Ethereum and Arbitrum, allowing developers to build applications that process sensitive data w…

21 Oct 2026, 15:05 UTC≈3,980 viewsread 24 October 2026
Photo

🏦 INSTITUTIONAL · Stablecoins OCC Finalizes GENIUS Act Rules for Stablecoin Issuers, Custody The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency finalized its rule covering payment stablecoin issuance and some custody activities under the GENIUS Act framework. 💡 Why it matters The rule establishes federal regulatory standards for stablecoin issuers and custodians, affecting compliance requirements and market access for …

21 Oct 2026, 10:04 UTC≈3,990 views2 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Photo

💰 MARKET · BTC Mystery Whale Pulls $90M Bitcoin From Wintermute in Second Weekly Haul Three brand-new wallets received 1,090 BTC worth about $90.38 million from market maker Wintermute, marking the second near-identical transfer in a week. 💡 Why it matters Large withdrawals from a major market maker to unknown wallets can signal shifting OTC demand or custody changes, affecting liquidity provision and market struc…

👍1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 137 posts we hold for @crypto_analysis_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Analysis News” (@crypto_analysis_news), 22,854 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_analysis_news.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.