Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TRADIX|CRYPTO

Channel

TRADIX|CRYPTO

@crypto_center20

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

20,813subscribers

+15,625 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002015404886
TypeChannel
Username@crypto_center20
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held47
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/crypto_center20

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

4,90320,81312,8587 August 2026 — 5,188 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,188 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,152 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,016 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,903 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,070 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,983 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,997 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,863 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,908 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,070 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,207 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,260 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,847 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,154 subscribers4 September 2026 — 12,466 subscribers6 September 2026 — 12,817 subscribers9 September 2026 — 12,493 subscribers12 September 2026 — 12,242 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,432 subscribers15 September 2026 — 12,929 subscribers17 September 2026 — 13,256 subscribers27 September 2026 — 15,295 subscribers4 October 2026 — 14,769 subscribers9 October 2026 — 15,196 subscribers13 October 2026 — 15,760 subscribers14 October 2026 — 15,882 subscribers15 October 2026 — 15,971 subscribers16 October 2026 — 16,021 subscribers18 October 2026 — 16,270 subscribers19 October 2026 — 16,326 subscribers20 October 2026 — 16,362 subscribers21 October 2026 — 16,412 subscribers22 October 2026 — 16,478 subscribers23 October 2026 — 17,197 subscribers24 October 2026 — 17,434 subscribers25 October 2026 — 17,978 subscribers26 October 2026 — 18,301 subscribers27 October 2026 — 18,479 subscribers28 October 2026 — 18,646 subscribers29 October 2026 — 19,092 subscribers30 October 2026 — 19,450 subscribers31 October 2026 — 20,091 subscribers1 November 2026 — 20,427 subscribers2 November 2026 — 20,599 subscribers3 November 2026 — 20,753 subscribers4 November 2026 — 20,813 subscribers7 August 20264 November 2026
47 measurements spanning 89 days, net +15,625. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,517–23,200 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 47
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 04:4820,813+60
3 Nov 2026, 05:5020,753+154
2 Nov 2026, 08:0520,599+172
1 Nov 2026, 06:2420,427+336
31 Oct 2026, 05:1820,091+641
30 Oct 2026, 05:0819,450+358
29 Oct 2026, 06:5919,092+446
28 Oct 2026, 03:3718,646+167
27 Oct 2026, 06:2718,479+178
26 Oct 2026, 08:1618,301+323
25 Oct 2026, 04:4117,978+544
24 Oct 2026, 03:3717,434+237
23 Oct 2026, 05:5917,197+719
22 Oct 2026, 06:5616,478+66
21 Oct 2026, 00:0416,412+50
20 Oct 2026, 00:4716,362+36
19 Oct 2026, 00:4016,326+56
18 Oct 2026, 02:2716,270+249
16 Oct 2026, 23:5616,021+50
15 Oct 2026, 22:2715,971first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.11%
avg views ÷ 20,813 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,900
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.188%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held45 (24 July 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total34,125
Reactions total59
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 02:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,229 reactions across 36 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤19615.9%
👍14011.4%
🥰13511.0%
😍13410.9%
🤩13410.9%
💯12510.2%
🎉12310.0%
🔥1229.93%
❤‍🔥1199.68%
🤣10.081%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,229 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 45 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @crypto_center20. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 45 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Nov 2026, 17:24 UTC213 views1 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🔽ICNT /usdt SHORT lev 20 Entry market Tp 1: 0.21 Tp 2: 0.197 Sl : 0.248 ⚠️%4 wallet ✅@crypto_center20

❤1

Signed jaber

2 Nov 2026, 17:39 UTC625 views3 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Tp 1 touched ✔️💵

🔥2👍1

Signed jaber

1 Nov 2026, 22:32 UTC967 views1 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🔽CVC /usdt SHORT lev 20 Entry market Tp 1: 0.022 Tp 2: 0.02 Sl 0.0262 ⚠️%4 wallet ✅@crypto_center20

👍1

Signed jaber

1 Nov 2026, 22:27 UTC810 views2 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Tp 1 touched ✔️💵

🔥2

Signed jaber

31 Oct 2026, 17:51 UTC≈1,300 views4 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🔼MAGMA /usdt Long lev 25 Entry market Tp 1 : 0.455 Tp 2: 0.48 Sl : 0.377 ⚠️%4 wallet ✅@crypto_center20

❤3👍1

Signed jaber

30 Oct 2026, 08:28 UTC≈2,110 views3 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤3

Signed jaber

30 Oct 2026, 08:27 UTC≈1,830 views1 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤1

Signed jaber

28 Oct 2026, 17:31 UTC≈2,690 views2 reactions1 Starread 4 November 2026

Tp 2 touched ✔️💵

❤2

Signed jaber

27 Oct 2026, 17:17 UTC≈2,950 views3 reactions2 Starsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🔽ENA /usdt SHORT lev 20 Entry market Tp 1: 0.21 Tp 2: 0197 Sl : 0.23 ⚠️%4 wallet ✅@crypto_center20

❤3

Signed jaber

26 Oct 2026, 16:57 UTC≈2,520 views2 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🔽BAT /usdt SHORT Lev 20 Entry market Tp 1: 0.13 Tp 2: 0.12 Sl : 0.155 ⚠️%5 wallet ✅@crypto_center20

❤2

Signed jaber

25 Oct 2026, 19:16 UTC≈1,990 views4 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🔼APR /usdt Long lev 20 Entry market Tp 1:0.045 Tp 2:0.05 Sl : 0.0383 ⚠️%4 wallet ✅@crypto_center20

❤3🔥1

Signed jaber

22 Oct 2026, 22:19 UTC≈3,300 views21 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

AIXBT /usdt 🔽SHORT Entry market Tp 1: 0.018 Tp 2: 0.0167 Sl : 0.0209 ⚠️%5 wallet ✅@crypto_center20

❤18🔥2👍1

Signed jaber

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @crypto_center20. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @crypto_center20 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
22 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
22 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
26 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TRADIX|CRYPTO” (@crypto_center20), 20,813 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_center20.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.