📊 JUST IN : Bitcoin hits $64,000
❤1🔥1

Channel
@crypto_ne3
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,172subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001763719024 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypto_ne3 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypto_ne3 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:36 | 1,172 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 1,173 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 1,177 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 1,178 | -5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:09 | 1,183 | -4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 1,187 | no change |
| 18 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 1,187 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
9 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 88.9% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📊 JUST IN : Bitcoin hits $64,000
❤1🔥1
💰 Ethereum just surpassed 200M non-empty wallets for the first time, signaling continued crypto adoption despite flat markets, per report.
❤2
ETF Flows : 27 Jul 2026 🔻 BTC ETFs : -$11.6M 🟢 ETH ETFs : $11.7M 🟢 SOL ETFs : $1000.0K 🟢 XRP ETFs : $0K 🔻 HYPE ETFs : -$2.9M 🔴 Total: -$1.8M net outflows
❤2
💎💎💎💎💎 Anthropic has launched Claude Opus 5, describing it as a thoughtful and proactive AI model. It offers top-tier performance at approximately half the cost of Fable 5.
❤2
Crypto speak: IMAO This acronym stands for “in my arrogant opinion.” When a person has never been asked about anything but suddenly decides to start a discussion on some important issue, it is very likely that they will start with the phrase “IMAO.” The term is very popular because in the cryptocommunity, everyone wants to share their opinion—even when no one asks them😅
❤1
💎💎💎💎💎 Seven Democratic Senators who support cryptocurrency argue that the CLARITY Act, drafted by Republicans, still lacks sufficient measures for ethics, consumer protection, and illicit finance. Despite these concerns, they remain dedicated to collaborating with Republicans to finalize and pass the legislation.
Binance Founder CZ: "crypto is not going away." "AI will need to use money. You will need money."
🧠 Polymarket traders now price a 53% chance that the CLARITY Act will be signed into law in 2026, up 22% over the past day.
💎💎💎💎💎 Abraxas Capital has bought $80,000,000 worth of $ETH this week. whales are loading $ETH.
💎💎💎💎💎 The CLARITY Act text is expected Thursday following a meeting with Trump, though Senate Democrats indicate they do not support it.
🧠 Ethereum holders are staking. Despite weak prices, the ETH share locked in staking hit a record 33.7% (Token Terminal). This suggests investors prefer earning yield and holding long-term over selling. Whether due to confidence or lack of alternatives, a record portion of Ethereum's supply is now staked rather than on the market.
💯💯💯💯💯💯 BITCOIN WHALE TRANSFERS $383 MILLION AFTER 8 YEARS OF INACTIVITY According to Lookonchain, 5,908 BTC worth around $383 million was transferred from a dormant wallet to a new address after eight years of inactivity.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @crypto_ne3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto News” (@crypto_ne3), 1,172 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_ne3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.