Channel
@crypto_portal
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
62,746subscribers
-1,742 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001534741801 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypto_portal |
| Description | 🚨Follow the latest developments on major virtual currencies, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, and more🚨 Promotion ➡️ @astroboiz |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 50 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypto_portal |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 12:16 | 62,746 | -1 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 11:06 | 62,747 | +49 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:50 | 62,698 | -627 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 07:42 | 63,325 | +9 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 06:26 | 63,316 | +22 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:28 | 63,294 | -68 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 01:00 | 63,362 | -126 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 20:20 | 63,488 | -159 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 17:06 | 63,647 | -229 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 13:40 | 63,876 | -107 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:55 | 63,983 | +2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 13:18 | 63,981 | -210 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 14:20 | 64,191 | -89 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 08:50 | 64,280 | -48 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 03:20 | 64,328 | -23 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 05:19 | 64,351 | -19 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 08:28 | 64,370 | -4 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 09:40 | 64,374 | -2 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 15:14 | 64,376 | -4 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 12:46 | 64,380 | first reading |
45 posts held, back to 6 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 187 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 45 (6 May 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 145,000 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 09:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
⚖️ CRYPTO FACES NEW REGULATORY THREATS — IS THE U.S. TURNING AGAINST BITCOIN? 🏛 The political landscape in Washington could become another major challenge for the crypto market. Following the latest U.S. midterm elections, investors are increasingly concerned about the future of digital asset regulation and the possibility of stricter government oversight. 🖥 Democrats in the House are reportedly drafting a new cryp…
⚙️ ARBITRUM FREEZES $30M IN BINANCE HACK-LINKED FUNDS — BUT ARB IS STILL FALLING! 🚨 Arbitrum's Security Council has frozen approximately $30 million worth of crypto assets linked to the massive Binance exploit. The operation involved 8,425 ETH and 74.555 million ARB tokens, which were moved from an address identified as connected to the attack. 🔒 According to the report, the emergency intervention was designed to p…
🚨 ETHEREUM FACES A 420K ETH SUPPLY SHOCK — IS A RECOVERY STILL POSSIBLE? ⚠️ Ethereum is facing a major supply concern following the recent $6.3 billion Binance hack. Reports suggest that the Lazarus Group holds more than 420,000 ETH, creating fears that a massive amount of Ethereum could eventually enter the market and increase selling pressure. 🔍 The situation became even more complicated after Tether froze $1.5 b…
🏦 DEUTSCHE BANK AND CHARLES SCHWAB EXPAND CRYPTO ACCESS — WHAT'S NEXT FOR BTC? 🌍 Traditional finance is moving deeper into digital assets. Deutsche Bank is preparing to introduce crypto custody services in Germany, initially supporting Bitcoin and Ethereum. The bank reportedly plans to expand its digital asset offering over time, potentially including stablecoins and additional markets. 🚀 Charles Schwab is opening …
🚨 MARA MOVES $82M IN BITCOIN — IS A SELL-OFF COMING? 💸 A major Bitcoin transfer has raised fresh concerns. Wallets linked to MARA Holdings reportedly deposited 1,000 BTC worth approximately $82.8 million into Binance and Gate. The move has attracted attention because the Bitcoin miner has previously sold BTC to fund operations and investments. ⚠️ But a transfer doesn’t automatically mean a sale. The deposits could …
🔴 ETHEREUM UNDER PRESSURE — CAN $2,400 HOLD? 📉 Ethereum is struggling to regain momentum. ETH has returned to the $2,404–$2,410 support zone after sellers rejected its recovery attempts near $2,460–$2,480. The market remains fragile as buyers struggle to regain control. 🏦 ETF outflows are adding to the pressure. U.S. spot Ethereum ETFs recorded approximately $319.97 million in weekly outflows, weakening institution…
🐻 BITCOIN BOUNCES TO $83.3K — BUT ARE THE BEARS STILL IN CONTROL? 📊 A Recovery That Needs Confirmation Bitcoin rebounded approximately 2.9% to $83,300 after dropping toward $81,000 on October 12. The quick recovery offered some relief to investors, but a price bounce does not automatically signal a trend reversal. The key question is whether buyers can sustain the momentum instead of allowing sellers to regain contr…
🐋 CRYPTO WHALES ARE MOVING — IS THE MARKET READY FOR A REVERSAL? 📊 The crypto market is sending mixed signals. Bitcoin’s recent pullback has increased uncertainty, while profit-taking and changing investor demand are putting pressure on the recovery. Although corrections are common after strong rallies, the next move will depend on whether buyers return at key price levels. 💰 Bitcoin’s profit-taking activity is att…
🚨 BITCOIN WHALES WAKE UP AFTER 13 YEARS — IS $100K NEXT? 🐋 Two dormant Bitcoin whales have suddenly returned to the market after 13 years of inactivity, moving a combined 1,346 BTC. Their holdings are now worth roughly $115 million, representing an extraordinary 479x increase from their original position. 💰 The timing is especially interesting as Bitcoin continues trading above $85K. While spot buyers have been sup…
🎯 BITCOIN AND THE JOBS REPORT — UPTOBER IN FOCUS 🪙 Bitcoin is holding around the $82K–$85K area as traders prepare for fresh U.S. jobs data. The upcoming report could become an important macro catalyst for BTC and the wider crypto market. 📊 According to AMBCrypto, ETF flows and incoming economic data are two major factors to watch. Changes in expectations around monetary policy can quickly affect liquidity and risk…
🔥 AAVE SURGES 17% — WHAT’S DRIVING THE RALLY? 📈 Aave (AAVE) jumped more than 17% on September 29, breaking above $175 and reaching levels not seen since earlier this year. The move comes as DeFi tokens attract renewed attention despite U.S. Treasury yields remaining above 5%. 💰 The rally has been building for weeks, with AAVE climbing from below $90 in mid-August and breaking through the $120, $140, and $150 resist…
🚨 BITCOIN ETF FLOWS TURN POSITIVE — CAN BTC HOLD $80K? 📈 Bitcoin is facing a major shift in institutional demand. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded around $2.65 billion in net inflows over five consecutive days, helping push cumulative 2026 flows back into positive territory. The surge also helped BTC climb toward an eight-month high near $87K. 🏦 BlackRock accounted for roughly half of the recent ETF demand, highligh…
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @crypto_portal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Portal” (@crypto_portal), 62,746 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_portal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.