Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net +511. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,238–9,916 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 11:21
9,838
+2
14 Sept 2026, 13:58
9,836
+11
10 Sept 2026, 22:59
9,825
+11
5 Sept 2026, 15:40
9,814
+13
1 Sept 2026, 06:37
9,801
-27
29 Aug 2026, 13:25
9,828
+6
26 Aug 2026, 14:37
9,822
+35
23 Aug 2026, 22:36
9,787
+112
20 Aug 2026, 06:46
9,675
+350
16 Aug 2026, 20:26
9,325
+9
13 Aug 2026, 15:57
9,316
-4
10 Aug 2026, 12:21
9,320
-2
7 Aug 2026, 19:08
9,322
-5
7 Aug 2026, 16:01
9,327
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:53
9,327
first reading
Engagement
63 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.9%
avg views ÷ 9,838 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,170
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.66%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 63 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
63 (26 July 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
5,843
Reactions total
97
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,309 reactions across 62 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
600
45.8%
🔥
285
21.8%
custom 5211187307473811545
158
12.1%
😁
110
8.40%
👍
61
4.66%
🐳
58
4.43%
🫡
34
2.60%
🌚
2
0.153%
🙈
1
0.076%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 62 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,309 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
24
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 62 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @crypto_sgx. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 63 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Первый мой заказ на вайбкодинге я продал за 50$. Сейчас у меня средний чек 1.3к$ на разработку. Между этими двумя цифрами прошёл год и дело тут не в том, насколько я прокачался в кодинге.
Примерно год назад начал плотно изучать нейронки и применять в своих задачах. Вначале я ахуевал от того как получается автоматизировать процессы, кроме того находил кучу применений этому. Дак вот, первый заказ на 50$ от кента на ра…
5 дней и мы закрываемся
➕ А закрываемся в рамках третьего окна SGX +VIBE в котором уже 230+ человек. Поэтому у всех есть последняя возможность зайти по этим ценам. Дальше опять повысим😫
И вот насколько: сейчас навсегда 69$, после закрытия навсегда 99$, помесячно 69$/мес. То есть через 5 дней один месяц будет стоить ровно столько, сколько сегодня стоит пожизненный доступ. Тот же материал, те же апдейты, разница толь…
Забираем 10-50$+ от проекта Emberwing
EMBERWING — это P2E игра прям в тг, где нам нужно тренировать драконов и отправлять их в различные сражения, чтобы зарабатывать $GRAM. По юай вайб клеш рояля, механика дефолтной тапалки.
Играется и фармится без вложений, а выводить накопленные $GRAM можно сразу на свой кош + у них сейчас проходит ивент с призовым пулом 4000 $GRAM (Участие бесплатное)
Как принять участие?
⭐️ П…
Исходя из большого количества вопросов, я думаю вообще стоить напомнить всем, как работает фрод, как обойти это все
Начнем с того, что сейчас практически у любой крипто-биржи или декса есть система анти-фрода (риск контроль), которая создана дабы абузеры, махинаторы так просто не могли выносить биржи под чистую
Все, кто давно в канале знают про это, эта инфа больше для новчиков. В целом мы все рассказывали и видоса…
Ox Alpha — реально альфа или очередное говно?
С недавнего времени в рилсах мне все больше и больше стало попадаться видосов о новой ии от неизвестного разработчика. Все ее чуть ли не облизывают, богословят. Да и по бенчмаркам она гораздо лучше 5.6sol, fable 5. Но так ли это на самом деле?
История началась 20 августа, когда на OpenRouter появилась новая модель Ox Alpha. Она бесплатная, заточена под кодинг и агентов,…
Новый видосик на канале. +Конкурс
Нашел тут на новый декс AlphaX и гемную промку на ~350$ на фьючерсы просто за пару действий по аккаунту. Я весь путь прошёл на видос, чтобы никто не гадал, где там что нажимать.
🖤https://youtu.be/sjUF1CZvPw0?si=0nVxpSMXuG8__T4c
🖤https://youtu.be/sjUF1CZvPw0?si=0nVxpSMXuG8__T4c
🖤https://youtu.be/sjUF1CZvPw0?si=0nVxpSMXuG8__T4c
Главное в чем плюс: у них нулевая комиссия, и не на три…
Итоги конкурса на 72$
Прочитал очень много тупой хуйни 😆 Выбирать прям не из чего (почти). любой чел, который потратил бы 10мин на норм идею забрал бы 40$ - сегодня еше будет варик залутать кста.
😯Победители на скринах, отпишите в лс для получения приза — @singularyx (пруфаните скрином что комм ваш)
Итоги:
1 место идея со стримами (напишите в комы че думаете)
2 место идея с рагпулом крипты (угарнул)
3 место идея с…
Лоусайз спредик нужен?
кукоин спот откуп
бингх фьюч шорт
лоусайз спред 8-20%, я конечно советую заливаться под 15%+, если еще дадут. Фандинг кусается, но по идее быстро сравняют
https://koshiktools.com/spreads?c=kucoin_spot~dgaiusdt~bingx~dgaiusdt
Админы на раскайфовке (на выходных)
Завтра втягиваемся в ворк, братья
Кстати у меня есть некая берлога куда я пощу рандомную хуету, кому кайф, велком - @sgxtyping.
А вы че делаете?
GM ☀️ / BTC > 76k$
Как бы я не хотел делать такие посты, я просто не могу. 3 дня колоссального роста подряд
Видимо реально бычка
+VIBE PRIVATE | МЫСЛИ | FREE MONEY | CHAT | YOUTUBE | SGX CRYPTO | SGX KYC & PROXY | SGX ALERTS
🫡12custom 52111873074738115455😁2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @crypto_sgx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@crypto_sgx edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SGX / CRYPTO” (@crypto_sgx), 9,838 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_sgx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.