Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 😎Crypto Vestor - Crypto Trends

Channel

😎Crypto Vestor - Crypto Trends

@crypto_vestor

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14,535subscribers

-587 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001590867296
TypeChannel
Username@crypto_vestor
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/crypto_vestor

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,53515,12214,828.57 August 2026 — 15,122 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,122 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,115 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,105 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,079 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,058 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,040 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,010 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,992 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,976 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,954 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,942 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,922 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,916 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,906 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,885 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,864 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,851 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,834 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,827 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,825 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,805 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,789 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,774 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,754 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,737 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,715 subscribers5 September 2026 — 14,690 subscribers8 September 2026 — 14,641 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,588 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,575 subscribers14 September 2026 — 14,571 subscribers17 September 2026 — 14,535 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net -587. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,447–15,210 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 23:2014,535-36
14 Sept 2026, 22:3814,571-4
13 Sept 2026, 11:5914,575-13
11 Sept 2026, 14:3614,588-53
8 Sept 2026, 21:5514,641-49
5 Sept 2026, 16:5714,690-25
3 Sept 2026, 19:1714,715-22
2 Sept 2026, 08:4714,737-17
1 Sept 2026, 05:3814,754-20
31 Aug 2026, 07:4414,774-15
30 Aug 2026, 11:1214,789-16
29 Aug 2026, 13:0614,805-20
28 Aug 2026, 10:3314,825-2
27 Aug 2026, 09:4514,827-7
26 Aug 2026, 10:0214,834-17
25 Aug 2026, 11:5214,851-13
24 Aug 2026, 13:5414,864-21
22 Aug 2026, 19:1614,885-21
21 Aug 2026, 09:4314,906-10
20 Aug 2026, 12:3514,916first reading

Engagement

62 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.03%
avg views ÷ 14,535 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,020
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 62 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held62 (28 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total18,400
Reactions total15
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 18:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
29s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

56 reactions across 36 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4275.0%
🔥712.5%
👍47.14%
🎉35.36%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 17:27 UTC40 views0 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🇺🇸 The US stock market is preparing for 24-hour trading The SEC will hold a roundtable discussion on September 17th dedicated to the US market's transition to 24-hour trading. Liquidity, overnight supervision, clearing, and the technical infrastructure for 24-hour exchange operations will be discussed. At the same time, the regulator has proposed significant updates to the rules for the transfer and recording of se

2 Sept 2026, 06:34 UTC388 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026

🇰🇵 Lazarus Group has surfaced on Hyperliquid In just three weeks, wallets linked to North Korean hackers moved over $30,000,000 in BTC through the platform, exchanging it for ETH and SOL. This is a particularly unpleasant story for Hyperliquid, as the platform, which lacks standard KYC, has previously raised concerns about potential sanctions evasion. Subscribe ✅️ | YouTube 📱 | TikTok 📱 Exchanges💰: LBank | Blofin

2

1 Sept 2026, 17:29 UTC569 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

😱 Every time BTC closed August in the green, September followed suit Subscribe ✅️ | YouTube 📱 | TikTok 📱 Exchanges💰: LBank | Blofin | Bitunix | OKX Get bonuses — sign up on the exchange

1 Sept 2026, 06:04 UTC889 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🧾 Over the past few months, Strategy has sold 5,310 BTC in three batches at prices ranging from $60,200 to $64,300 When Bitcoin began to rise, Strategy returned to buying, acquiring 4,603 BTC at an average price of around $80,300, or approximately 25–33% more. Subscribe ✅️ | YouTube 📱 | TikTok 📱 Exchanges💰: LBank | Blofin | Bitunix | OKX Get bonuses — sign up on the exchange

1

31 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC812 viewsread 2 September 2026

⚖️ Despite a nearly 30% rise in August, BTC trading volume remains near three-year lows Subscribe ✅️ | YouTube 📱 | TikTok 📱 Exchanges💰: LBank | Blofin | Bitunix | OKX Get bonuses — sign up on the exchange

31 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC717 viewsread 2 September 2026

🚨The Cronos blockchain was suspended following an attack on the Tectonic lending protocol. The damage amounted to approximately $75 million. Subscribe ✅️ | YouTube 📱 | TikTok 📱 Exchanges💰: LBank | Blofin | Bitunix | OKX Get bonuses — sign up on the exchange

30 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC974 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

📉 Following the Fed Chairman's speech, Bitcoin fell below $78,000 Kevin Warsh believes that inflation is not yet moving steadily enough toward the 2% target. Following his remarks, the likelihood of a rate hike in September rose to 57%. Amid the correction, positions worth more than $384 million were liquidated in one day, $310 million of which were long positions. Subscribe ✅️ | YouTube 📱 | TikTok 📱 Exchanges💰: L

2

29 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC≈1,360 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

😧 Ledger Found a Vulnerability for Silent Transaction Substitution The OneKey team reproduced a vulnerability in the Ledger Ethereum app. While one transaction was displayed on the screen, it could be surreptitiously replaced with another just before signing. The issue affected version 1.22.1 and was related to a desynchronization between the transaction display and the signature data. Ledger fixed the vulnerabilit

1

28 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC≈1,380 viewsread 2 September 2026

💸 Crypto funds raised $1.65 billion in three days amid Bitcoin's surge According to CoinShares, global crypto products raised $1.65 billion from Monday to Wednesday. Nearly $1 billion of this came from Bitcoin, while $478 million came from Ethereum. Subscribe ✅️ | YouTube 📱 | TikTok 📱 Exchanges💰: LBank | Blofin | Bitunix | OKX Get bonuses — sign up on the exchange

28 Aug 2026, 06:33 UTC≈1,650 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

⚡️ Bitcoin Conducted Its First Quantum-Resistant Transaction—Without a Network Upgrade StarkWare researchers have created a way to protect Bitcoin from potential quantum computer attacks using existing network capabilities. The method is currently computationally intensive and unsuitable for mass use, but it demonstrates that Bitcoin can potentially be protected from quantum threats even before a protocol upgrade.

🎉1

27 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC≈1,380 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🚨Moonwell hacked for $8.7 million The attacker artificially inflated the price of the low-liquidity MAMO token, deposited it as overvalued collateral, and withdrew more liquid assets from the protocol, including cbBTC, USDC, wstETH, and ETH. According to CertiK, the hacker has already accumulated the stolen funds at a single address. Subscribe ✅️ | YouTube 📱 | TikTok 📱 Exchanges💰: LBank | Blofin | Bitunix | OKX Ge

3

27 Aug 2026, 06:52 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 2 September 2026

💸 Over the past 7 days, 5 billion USDC have been printed in Circle Subscribe ✅️ | YouTube 📱 | TikTok 📱 Exchanges💰: LBank | Blofin | Bitunix | OKX Get bonuses — sign up on the exchange

Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @crypto_vestor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“😎Crypto Vestor - Crypto Trends” (@crypto_vestor), 14,535 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_vestor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.