๐ OPEN WINGO 1 MINUTES ๐ฐ๐ฐ ๐ฑ REGISTER NOW FAST โฌ๏ธโ https://www.dmplay20.com/#/register?invitationCode=12641238118 โ ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅโ
โค1๐1

Channel
@crypto_yaarwin_official
On this record: Topic ยท Observations ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry
259,686subscribers
-24,013 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 100,000โ316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001608511488 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypto_yaarwin_official |
| Description | ๐ฐ Crypto News - Dive into the latest crypto buzz, insider info, and the funniest memes around. #CryptoNews #Crypto #News |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypto_yaarwin_official |
Gambling & betting โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
11.6 average views per post against 259,877 subscribers โ an engagement rate of 0.004%. Across the 6,815 registered channels in the same cohort โ 100,017โ316,171 subscribers โ the middle half sit between 1.89% and 13.4%, with a median of 5.44%.
| Window | 30 days (6 October 2026 โ 5 November 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 878 of 878 published in the window (878 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 10,172 |
| Mature posts only | 0.053% over 20 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 259,877 measured 4 November 2026 |
| Cohort | b100000 ยท 6,815 channels ยท p10 0.551% ยท p25 1.89% ยท p50 5.44% ยท p75 13.4% ยท p90 25.8% |
| Position in cohort | 0.059th percentile ยท 1/1000 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ยฑ0% of the figure, from Telegramโs rounding |
| Post language | Hindi ยท 100.0% of the windowโs posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3ร away from that cohortโs median โ below it โ on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes โ audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channelโs own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through โ we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 17:09 | 259,686 | -51 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 16:40 | 259,737 | -72 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 13:42 | 259,809 | -68 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 12:45 | 259,877 | -54 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 15:08 | 259,931 | -53 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 12:28 | 259,984 | -46 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 15:38 | 260,030 | -65 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 12:30 | 260,095 | -84 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:06 | 260,179 | -111 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 13:07 | 260,290 | -131 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 14:20 | 260,421 | -112 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 16:19 | 260,533 | -47 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 13:00 | 260,580 | -47 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 14:47 | 260,627 | -72 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 15:04 | 260,699 | -165 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:36 | 260,864 | -358 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:16 | 261,222 | -296 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 07:55 | 261,518 | -275 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 04:41 | 261,793 | -91 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 01:37 | 261,884 | first reading |
3,065 posts held, back to 18 October 2025 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 190 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 633 of 859 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 3,065 (18 October 2025 โ 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 9,518 |
| Reactions total | 860 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 14:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 8 November 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 62 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
977 reactions across 719 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ๐ | 154 | 15.8% | |
| โค | 137 | 14.0% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 135 | 13.8% | |
| ๐ฏ | 130 | 13.3% | |
| ๐ | 124 | 12.7% | |
| ๐ฅ | 118 | 12.1% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 79 | 8.09% | |
| ๐ | 58 | 5.94% | |
| โก | 42 | 4.30% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 726 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 977 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 6 October 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegramโs own โeditedโ marker: 0 of 859 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before โ this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
๐ OPEN WINGO 1 MINUTES ๐ฐ๐ฐ ๐ฑ REGISTER NOW FAST โฌ๏ธโ https://www.dmplay20.com/#/register?invitationCode=12641238118 โ ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅโ
โค1๐1
โก๏ธ ๐๐๐ง ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ฅ ๐ฃ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐๐ง๐๐ข๐ก โฌ ๏ธ โญโโโ ๐ DM PLAY VIP ๐ โโโโฎ โฌ๏ธ FAST โข EASY โข SECURE โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ ๐ SESSION TIMING ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ OFFICIAL TRUSTED LINKโ https://www.dmplay20.com/#/register?invitationCode=12641238118
๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ธ ๐ด๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ฝ ๐ป๐๐บ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ธ๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ธ๐ธ๐ฎ๐ฟ ๐บ๐ฒ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ผ ๐ฏ๐ต๐ฎ๐ถ๐๐ผ โฉ๐ฏ ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฏ ๐๐ฐ๐ฎ๐บ ๐ต๐ผ๐๐ฎ ๐ต๐ฎ๐ถ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ณ๐ถ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ฟ ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ด๐ถ๐ป๐ฎ๐น ๐๐๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ต๐ถ ๐บ๐ถ๐น๐ฒ๐ด๐ฎ ๐ฅ๐ ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ต๐ถ ๐๐ฎ๐ด๐ฎ๐ต ๐ธ๐ต๐ฒ๐น๐ผ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ผ๐ด๐ฎ ๐ญ๐ฌ๐ฌ% ๐ โก๏ธ๐ฟ๐๐๐ก๐ฎ ๐ญ๐ฌ ๐๐๐ข๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ง๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐๐ค๐ฃ ๐ โก ๐ญ๐ฌ:๐ฌ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐ฅ ๐ญ๐ญ:๐ฏ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐ โก ๐ญ๐ฎ:๐ฏ๐ฌ๐ฃ๐ ๐ฅ ๐ฌ๐ญ:๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ฃ๐ ๐ โก ๐ฌ๐ฎ:๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ฃ๐ ๐ฅ ๐ฌ๐ฐ:๐ฏ๐ฌ๐ฃ๐ ๐ โก ๐ฌ๐ฒ:๐ฏ๐ฌ๐ฃ๐ ๐ฅ ๐ฌ๐ณ:๐ฏ๐ฌ๐ฃ๐ ๐ โก ๐ฌ๐ต:๐ฏ๐ฌ๐ฃ๐ ๐ฅ ๐ญ๐ฌ:๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ฃ๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ https://www.dmplay20.com/#/register?invitationCode=12641238118
Sticker, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
๐ฏ1
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
๐ฅฐ1
Photo, posted without a caption
โค2
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
8/0
๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ค โก๏ธ๐ค๐ค REDD โ โก๏ธ PERIOD 789 ๐
Showing the 12 most recent of 3,065 posts we hold for @crypto_yaarwin_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Telegramโs own answer, not this registerโs. When this register asks Telegramโs API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it โ never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramโs; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegramโs recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register โ how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โCRYPTO ๐YAAR WIN๐โ (@crypto_yaarwin_official), 259,686 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_yaarwin_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.