Channel
@cryptofiynews
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
17,163subscribers
-1,308 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002209758688 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptofiynews |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 45 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptofiynews |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:54 | 17,163 | -9 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 12:48 | 17,172 | -15 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 15:21 | 17,187 | -5 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 12:29 | 17,192 | -6 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 14:30 | 17,198 | -21 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 14:58 | 17,219 | -13 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 13:18 | 17,232 | -15 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 11:05 | 17,247 | -6 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 12:14 | 17,253 | -16 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 11:36 | 17,269 | -7 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 10:16 | 17,276 | -22 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 07:27 | 17,298 | -18 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 09:08 | 17,316 | -15 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 09:30 | 17,331 | -19 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 07:46 | 17,350 | -18 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:10 | 17,368 | -8 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 00:46 | 17,376 | -15 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 03:08 | 17,391 | -13 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 23:46 | 17,404 | -14 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 01:48 | 17,418 | first reading |
51 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 51 (30 July 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 36,714 |
| Reactions total | 56 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 04:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
750 reactions across 22 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 9.60% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 | 72 | 9.60% | |
| 🤪 | 61 | 8.13% | |
| 🕊 | 59 | 7.87% | |
| 😎 | 58 | 7.73% | |
| 🆒 | 45 | 6.00% | |
| 🤗 | 45 | 6.00% | |
| 🤩 | 44 | 5.87% | |
| 👏 | 42 | 5.60% | |
| 🎉 | 40 | 5.33% | |
| 💅 | 37 | 4.93% | |
| 😘 | 36 | 4.80% | |
| 🥰 | 32 | 4.27% | |
| ❤ | 30 | 4.00% | |
| 😁 | 28 | 3.73% | |
| 🙏 | 27 | 3.60% | |
| 🍓 | 26 | 3.47% | |
| 🫡 | 24 | 3.20% | |
| 😇 | 22 | 2.93% | |
| 🤣 | 22 | 2.93% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 750 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
BNY is setting up shop in Abu Dhabi with Finstreet and the ADI crowd. Institutional custody for btc and eth. Just another way to cage the assets we were told were decentralized. My bagel is burnt. They want to bridge traditional banking to the chain so they can sit in the middle and skim every transaction. If BNY gets their hooks into the ADI chain, they aren't here for the tech. They are here because the regulators …
Taurus just slapped smart contract support onto Stellar, pretending they can make institutional finance less of a rigged casino. They claim it adds governance to tokenized assets, but it is just another layer of bloat for banks to hide their bad trades behind. The coffee is bitter as hell today. If these firms really think embedding legal rules into code saves them from getting wrecked when the smart contract inevita…
Dtcc is hitching its wagon to the canton network because the legacy clearing house is basically running on steam and prayer at this point. Nasdaq and visa are in on it too. They want tokenization to fix the settlement lag that keeps their books bleeding out capital. But they call it innovation while they just build a faster cage for the same old derivatives. My bagel is burnt. They think blockchain solves the lack of…
Galaxy filing for a national trust charter. They want the fed badge so they can stop playing state-level whack-a-mole with regulators. It is a play for legitimacy, but let us be real, it is just them trying to look like a bank so the pension funds do not run when they hear crypto. My bagel tastes like cardboard. If they get the sign-off, they stop being a shady digital shop and start being another institution that wi…
Google finally wants a piece of the custody pie. Their mpc setup just means they are trading one master key for a decentralized mess that probably still has a backdoor somewhere in the kernel. My espresso tastes like burning rubber. Big tech is moving in to mop up the remaining institutional interest because they know the market is rigged and they want to be the ones holding the keys to the kingdom. If they pull this…
OCC finally stamped the Ripple trust charter. It is just another layer of red tape painted to look like progress while the real money moves in the dark. My coffee tastes like battery acid. The RNTB will park the reserves for RLUSD but dont think for a second this stops the SEC from hunting them if the winds change. They want to look legit for the big guys so they can dump these bags into institutional wallets. It is …
Look at this perpetual preferred stock nonsense. They are basically selling high yield IOUs to buy btc and calling it a treasury strategy. It works while the price pumps and the equity trades at a premium. But what happens when the music stops and the market stops buying the new issuance? They are on the hook for double digit dividends in cash while their collateral sits in a volatile bucket. My bagel is burnt. They …
Broadridge pushed 359 billion in daily repo volume across their ledger last month. Great. Now the banks can shuffle their collateral faster while the rest of us get bled dry by the spread. It is just plumbing, people. They are not changing the game, just speeding up the pace of the inevitable haircut when the Treasury market finally chokes on its own debt. My bagel is burnt. They call it efficiency. I call it a digit…
JPM is porting their tokenized money market funds to Solana now. Just another layer of abstraction for institutional guys to hide their bad math while the rest of us get wrecked in the wash. My bagel is stale. They want us to think programmable cash is some brave new world but it is just faster ways to settle the same old debt. If Solana goes down like it likes to do every few months, the liquidity just vanishes. Poo…
Swiss regulators just rubber-stamped the BBIT fund. Retail is finally getting invited to the slaughterhouse. They call it market maturity, I call it fresh meat for the grinders who have been waiting to dump their bags. The coffee here tastes like burnt rubber and despair. FINMA dropping the diversification rules means they think bitcoin is safe enough for your grandmother to lose her pension on. If this thing hits, t…
Standard Chartered just swallowed Zodia whole. No more joint venture nonsense. They want the custody keys because they know the game is shifting to regulated walls. It is all about internalizing the tech and selling the software to other suits who are too scared to build their own. My coffee is cold and the market is lying. The bank is essentially turning crypto into just another boring equity play, sucking the soul …
Super League is dead. Long live Superplanet. They are dumping 2100 bitcoin into a gaming shell and calling it a treasury play. The math is simple but the stench of desperation is strong. They think issuing preferred shares to dodge debt cycles is a magic trick. It is not. My shoes are leaking. The market is just repackaging the same old bags with a shinier sticker to trick retail into buying the top. If the btc price…
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @cryptofiynews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cryptofiy News” (@cryptofiynews), 17,163 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptofiynews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.