Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for cryptogirls shitpost 🦈

Channel

cryptogirls shitpost 🦈

@cryptogirlsdao

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,890subscribers

-29 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001845621868
TypeChannel
Username@cryptogirlsdao
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptogirlsdao

Growth

1,8901,9191,904.56 August 2026 — 1,919 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,918 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,911 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,906 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,903 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,902 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,895 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,891 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,893 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,891 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,890 subscribers6 August 20267 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 32 days, net -29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,886–1,923 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 22:381,890-1
3 Sept 2026, 06:081,891-2
30 Aug 2026, 14:351,893+2
27 Aug 2026, 10:281,891-4
24 Aug 2026, 00:431,895-7
20 Aug 2026, 03:031,902-1
16 Aug 2026, 20:531,903-3
13 Aug 2026, 07:261,906-5
10 Aug 2026, 06:511,911-7
7 Aug 2026, 11:271,918-1
6 Aug 2026, 17:331,919first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

136 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁3928.7%
❤‍🔥3223.5%
🔥2619.1%
💯1511.0%
💋96.62%
🎉75.15%
💅32.21%
😭32.21%
🥰21.47%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 136 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTC302 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Такая лента активируется когда Игрок подбирается близко к Истине Они это замечают и пытаются сбить его с пути

😁5

Signed Крипто Настя l cryptogirls

7 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC317 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мои реки в инсте sos

😁1

Signed Крипто Настя l cryptogirls

6 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC409 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Герлс вайбс

❤‍🔥3

Signed Крипто Настя l cryptogirls

2 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC690 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня день рождения у нашей прекрасной @Sashanotonline . С днём рождения, дорогая!💋

❤‍🔥13🎉7💅3

Signed Крипто Настя l cryptogirls

31 Jul 2026, 10:20 UTC755 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

извините ору с этого 🤭🤭

😁18

Signed A A

30 Jul 2026, 20:19 UTC716 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А я все приближаюсь ближе к @humuuu по балканам

😭3❤‍🔥2

Signed Katy

29 Jul 2026, 20:09 UTC643 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Скоро будем бронировать места на асфальте

😁6

Signed Katy

29 Jul 2026, 19:51 UTC577 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Добываем еду как можем

🔥12

Signed Крипто Настя l cryptogirls

26 Jul 2026, 12:37 UTC801 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Конопля лучшее растение

💯15

Signed Крипто Настя l cryptogirls

26 Jul 2026, 09:22 UTC798 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Может нам туда надо?

❤‍🔥14😁5

Signed Крипто Настя l cryptogirls

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @cryptogirlsdao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“cryptogirls shitpost 🦈” (@cryptogirlsdao), 1,890 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptogirlsdao.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.