Channel
@cryptolandex
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
164,012subscribers
-4,957 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001230323673 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @cryptoland_en @cryptolandex |
| Description | Real-time crypto signals, analysis & news. Data-driven insights for smarter trading. 💬 Community Group: @CryptoLandHub 🐦 x.com/CryptoLandApp 📸 instagram.com/CryptoLandApp 👤 Owner: @Estavi |
| Created | 21 September 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptolandex |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 164,012 | -120 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 164,132 | -373 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 164,505 | -77 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 164,582 | -103 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 164,685 | -23 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 164,708 | -423 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 165,131 | -21 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 165,152 | -208 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:39 | 165,360 | -107 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:59 | 165,467 | -334 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:25 | 165,801 | -307 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:58 | 166,108 | -127 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 166,235 | -298 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:07 | 166,533 | -175 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:06 | 166,708 | -236 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:56 | 166,944 | -40 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 166,984 | -140 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:22 | 167,124 | -197 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 167,321 | -219 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 167,540 | first reading |
248 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 248 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 248 (4 August 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,544 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
5 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 40.0% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 40.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 248 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 248 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⛈ Strategy Shares Hit Two-Month High as STRC Rebounds Toward $100 Alongside Bitcoin ➡️ Strategy shares climbed to a two-month high as Bitcoin continued its rally. ➡️ Meanwhile, STRC rebounded toward the $100 level, highlighting renewed strength across Strategy’s Bitcoin-linked financial instruments. 💙 @CryptoLand_EN
🔂 Grayscale Moves Closer to Launching First U.S. Zcash ETF With Fresh SEC Filing 💬 Grayscale filed its fifth amendment with the SEC for its proposed Zcash ETF, bringing the product closer to a potential U.S. launch. 💬 The ETF would trade under ZCH on NYSE Arca with a 2.5% annual sponsor fee if approved. 💙 @CryptoLand_EN
💰 Bernstein Sees Bitcoin Heading Toward $80K as Liquidity and ETF Flows Rebound 🚀 Bernstein analysts say Bitcoin’s recent surge is increasingly being driven by liquidity and improving momentum, rather than short covering alone. 🚀 A rebound in Spot Bitcoin ETF inflows is also providing additional support for the rally. 💙 @CryptoLand_EN
🎨 AI Adoption in Crypto Crime Is Rising, TRM Labs Warns 🔴 TRM Labs reports that criminals are increasingly adopting AI tools to scale crypto-related attacks. 🔴 AI is being used for phishing, fraud, impersonation and more sophisticated cybercrime operations. 💙 @CryptoLand_EN
🚨 BounceBit to Sunset Blockchain and Migrate to BNB Chain After $3M Exploit ❌ BounceBit plans to sunset its current blockchain and migrate to BNB Chain following a roughly $3 million exploit. ❌ The move aims to rebuild infrastructure and improve long-term ecosystem security. 💙 @CryptoLand_EN
💎 XRP Leads Altcoin Rally as Bitcoin Posts Biggest Weekly Gain in Two Years ➡️ XRP led the altcoin rally while Bitcoin recorded its strongest weekly performance in nearly two years. ➡️ The move signals renewed confidence and broader participation across the crypto market. 💙 @CryptoLand_EN
⌨️ Anthropic Targets IPO That Could Rival or Surpass SpaceX’s Record Offering ➡️ AI company Anthropic is reportedly targeting an IPO that could raise as much as or more than SpaceX’s record $86.2 billion offering. ➡️ The move highlights massive investor demand for leading artificial intelligence companies. 💙 @CryptoLand_EN
Anchorage CEO Says AI Could Create a “Jetsons-Like” Future Economy ➡️ Anchorage CEO said artificial intelligence could create a future where autonomous agents and digital systems play a larger role in the economy. ➡️ Blockchain infrastructure may provide the foundation for secure digital ownership and automated transactions. 💙 @CryptoLand_EN
🔵 Coinbase CEO Says Crypto Clarity Is Coming Through Senate Bill or SEC/CFTC Rules ✅ Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said crypto regulatory clarity in the U.S. is coming either through a Senate bill requiring 60+ votes or new SEC and CFTC rules. ✅ The developments could define the next phase of digital asset regulation. 💙 @CryptoLand_EN
♾️ Ondo Executive Says Tokenization Is Following the Same Path as Early ETFs 💬 An Ondo executive said tokenization is following a similar adoption path to early ETFs. 💬 The company believes tokenized real-world assets could expand access to traditional financial markets through blockchain infrastructure. 💙 @CryptoLand_EN
🔘 CZ Supports Tokenization Across All Blockchains Despite Liquidity Fragmentation 🔘 CZ said he supports tokenization across all blockchain networks. 🔘 He acknowledged the challenge of Fragmented Liquidity, but believes multiple players will accelerate the growth of the sector. 💙 @CryptoLand_EN
🔵 Kraken Parent Payward Explores Becoming a Full Bank Outside the U.S. 🗯 Kraken’s parent company Payward is exploring the possibility of becoming a full-service bank outside the United States. 🗯 The move would expand Kraken beyond crypto trading into broader financial services. 💙 @CryptoLand_EN
Showing the 12 most recent of 248 posts we hold for @cryptolandex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 945,933 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoLand™ Signal | Analysis | News” (@cryptolandex), 164,012 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptolandex.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.