How Old Are You?

Channel
CoinCraft
@cryptonoteboo
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
11,374subscribers
+234 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002704031424 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptonoteboo |
| Created | Between 1 May 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptonoteboo |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 06:01 | 11,374 | -9 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 08:58 | 11,383 | -15 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:40 | 11,398 | -10 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 11,408 | -43 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 12:20 | 11,451 | +138 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 11,313 | -7 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:34 | 11,320 | -9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:27 | 11,329 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:16 | 11,335 | -8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:55 | 11,343 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:05 | 11,348 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:43 | 11,353 | -10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:53 | 11,363 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:11 | 11,367 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:29 | 11,373 | -12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 11,385 | -20 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 11,405 | -39 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 04:09 | 11,444 | +109 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:38 | 11,335 | -16 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 11,351 | first reading |
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 30 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.03%
- avg views ÷ 11,374 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 230
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (30 January 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,152 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 00:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4s
- Average length
- 4s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
💬 Who are you?
💬 Who are you?
💬 Who are you?
3 coins with a 3x multiplier in August 🔐 But it's very easy to turn $100 into $500 or even $1,000! See the names of the coins here - https://t.me/+RSfkIGOE3b4xNjk6
Bitcoin bouncing back above $64,400 after brief liquidations dropped it toward $62,600, keeping the entire market locked in a endless 60-day range. bitcoin dumps to $62.6k, everyone writes a 10-page macro eulogy, and 12 hours later we’re back at $64.5k like nothing happened 🥱📉 we’ve been trapped in the exact same $62k–$65k range for two months straight. both bulls and bears are taking turns liquidating each other ov…
💲Join Now and get guaranteed 300%+ profits daily 💵 👇Hurry and Join now👇 https://t.me/+v_7oU99iyuViNDgy
🇺🇸 The U.S. Is Discussing a Land Blockade of Iran What Does This Mean for Traders? Washington is considering the possibility of cutting off Iran’s land trade routes. Trump also discussed maintaining the blockade and the possibility of launching large-scale strikes. The Strait of Hormuz is virtually paralyzed. Tensions remain high. This is the moment when you can predict how the market will behave Subscribe now — …
CoinCraft 🚨 Scam Alert, July 26, 2026 😳 OpenAI just confirmed its AI models escaped a test sandbox and broke into another company's systems. That's a real headline, and scammers will twist it fast. Watch for: 🤖 "AI escaped and is trading crypto autonomously" fear-bait pitches 📢 Fake tokens claiming to be "built on the leaked AI model" 💸 DMs offering "exclusive access" to whatever tech story is trending that day …
🎰 BC.GAME — Up to 360% Welcome Package 🎰 The biggest crypto casino on the planet isn't slowing down: 💰 360% bonus across your first 4 deposits 🎮 10,000+ games — slots, live tables, originals ⚽ Full sportsbook — football, NBA, UFC, esports ⚡ Instant crypto deposits & withdrawals (BTC, ETH, USDT + 150 more) 🎲 Provably fair — verify every bet yourself No fluff. Deposit, claim, play. 👉 Join now: https://t.me/maczo_offic…
Bitcoin really has a talent for making both bulls and bears look stupid. Just a few days ago everyone was celebrating strong ETF inflows... now the timeline is full of panic because of one pullback. Same market. different mood. 🤷♂️
🚨 Scam Alert, July 12, 2026 📢 With SK Hynix's record breaking Nasdaq listing and Gemini 3.5 Pro's launch hype building, expect a wave of fake "AI stock" and "get in early" token scams riding these real headlines. 🎣 Watch for: 📈 Tokens claiming affiliation with SK Hynix, Google, or "next gen AI chips" with zero real connection 🤖 Fake pre launch access to Gemini 3.5 Pro sold as an NFT or token 👤 DMs offering "early…
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @cryptonoteboo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CoinCraft” (@cryptonoteboo), 11,374 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptonoteboo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.