Channel
@cryptoprophetcalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,177subscribers
-389 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001925306887 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptoprophetcalls |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptoprophetcalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:44 | 3,177 | -41 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 3,218 | -17 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 3,235 | -73 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 3,308 | -64 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:28 | 3,372 | -48 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 3,420 | -94 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 3,514 | -50 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:10 | 3,564 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 3,566 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 3,566 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 13 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
152 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 79 | 52.0% | |
| 🔥 | 36 | 23.7% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 12.5% | |
| 🤣 | 12 | 7.89% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 1.97% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 1.32% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.658% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 152 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
What a Trash call from my side. Spoke with dev first day promised he will deliver but all he delivered was a rugg. I Dont think im able to scan 10 plays every single day just for one to moon then call myself a goat. I wanted to stick with Perps plays but also that im lacking at this point. Holding a position for a month now😂😂😂 A month and 2 weeks. Disgusting. besides some playfull shorts every now and then i wouldnt …
❤11🔥5👍2😢1
Gonna make my first call on Robinhood Plume. Arround 700k. For the first time, stock options can be traded on-chain. Looks like good utility Lets see how high this can go https://plume.trade/ https://t.me/plumetrade https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x4503430150680B9d96aa0BE20C4fC2E13ff9dfe5
❤4🔥2👍1🤣1😢1
I miss the days where most plays would look like this, and not surfing through thousands of launched memecoins just to find one good narrrative. Complete miss on the latest runners made me rethink "Should i try the memecoins again and start sharing in the channel? Or should i just stick with what is more safe which is perps for me?" But you know what after watching Ansem Coin move from nothing to 400M made me realiz…
❤15🔥3👍1
Gooood morning bros🔥🔥 Long time no see. Been enjoying Summer time and the WC games🔥 Btc has went into the WOW event luckily i had enough money to cover the whole dump i was so close to losing my mind bc a flush from 82k directly to 60k was NOT on my toDo list. But here we are. I am still holding my longs pulled entry to 67k. And bought other coins to make out the difference, Zec dump opportunity was very tempting and…
❤7🔥2👍1
Btc today.
🤣11❤2👌1
I get it a correction should be a 15% pullback on a major coin like BTC. But wtf is this lmao? 15% was between 82k and 70k now we are ranging in 65k at the moment arround 20% from local ath. My entry isnt that good i know i wont get liquidated but 72k feels so high rn. 20% dip is diabolical Not a single green candle in-between God have mercy on us all❤️
❤9🔥1😱1
Good morning bros and happy new start of the week. Btc just finished the 10-15% pullback from all time highs. Im still holding my posiitons. We moved as i said from 82k to 72- 70k area. But the real question is was this actually the bottom? or is there even more? in both cases we are ready for both scenarios. till now im only 1 DCA position in so far and im chill holding no need to stress. If u aint in no position…
🔥4❤2👍1
Good morning bros🔥🔥Yes its that time of the day. Its time for the Long people to wake up... BTC bled for the past week, reaching lows of 74k. I believe its time for me to start building a long here. From the start at 82k i believed BTC would revisit 71- 70k as retest of lows. We shorted the highs, and now its time to Long the lows, even if btc goes down to 71- 70k we will be ready as usual with our DCA positions. Wor…
👍4❤3🔥2
Gm guys🔥🔥 I believe BTC found a support level at the moment. So lets break it down 4-hour chart is showing a clear bearish structure, but the market is now attempting a short term bounce after a sharp sell off. Probability Breakdown 🔴 Bearish continuation to $75,000–$73,000 55% 🟡 Relief bounce to $78,500–$79,500, then rejection 35% 🟢 Full bullish recovery above $80,500 10% Most Likely Scenario: Bounce First, Then…
❤5🔥4👍1
Good morning and what a beautiful day🔥🔥 Market has been bleeding ever since it failed to break through Local ATH, Plus the Clarity act news didint have enough fuel to push us even back to ATH. Congrats to Shortors who hold with conviction this is our time to Shine. Closing shorts here on this First Support line of 77,800k. Im happy with how much i made so far. Held conviction. trusted my plan and added in levels whe…
❤7🔥4😱2
Son............💸💸🔥
❤4🔥3👍2
BTC + CLARITY Act Outlook (Today) With Bitcoin around $79,600, the market is sitting directly on a major support area. If the CLARITY Act headlines are perceived as favorable for crypto, that could act as a catalyst for a sharp relief rally. two scenarios are gonna unfold today. either we pump on clarity act to 82.5k - 83k or dump on news to 78k- 77k Either u short on top or long scalp at bottom❤️❤️
❤5👍4🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @cryptoprophetcalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,367,393 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoProphet Calls💸” (@cryptoprophetcalls), 3,177 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoprophetcalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.