Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for .

Channel

.

@cryptosharkg1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

36,725subscribers

-1,031 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001752306011
TypeChannel
Username@cryptosharkg1
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptosharkg1

Growth

36,72537,75637,240.57 August 2026 — 37,756 subscribers8 August 2026 — 37,730 subscribers9 August 2026 — 37,693 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37,623 subscribers11 August 2026 — 37,593 subscribers12 August 2026 — 37,564 subscribers13 August 2026 — 37,515 subscribers14 August 2026 — 37,473 subscribers16 August 2026 — 37,412 subscribers17 August 2026 — 37,356 subscribers18 August 2026 — 37,314 subscribers19 August 2026 — 37,292 subscribers20 August 2026 — 37,245 subscribers21 August 2026 — 37,199 subscribers22 August 2026 — 37,161 subscribers24 August 2026 — 37,070 subscribers25 August 2026 — 37,035 subscribers26 August 2026 — 36,991 subscribers27 August 2026 — 36,950 subscribers28 August 2026 — 36,916 subscribers29 August 2026 — 36,890 subscribers30 August 2026 — 36,841 subscribers31 August 2026 — 36,790 subscribers1 September 2026 — 36,756 subscribers2 September 2026 — 36,725 subscribers7 August 20262 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 26 days, net -1,031. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,570–37,911 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 05:2736,725-31
1 Sept 2026, 03:0536,756-34
31 Aug 2026, 04:3536,790-51
30 Aug 2026, 02:4436,841-49
29 Aug 2026, 05:3436,890-26
28 Aug 2026, 06:0736,916-34
27 Aug 2026, 07:5436,950-41
26 Aug 2026, 07:1836,991-44
25 Aug 2026, 10:0937,035-35
24 Aug 2026, 13:2437,070-91
22 Aug 2026, 19:2737,161-38
21 Aug 2026, 12:4837,199-46
20 Aug 2026, 12:0437,245-47
19 Aug 2026, 13:4337,292-22
18 Aug 2026, 15:0237,314-42
17 Aug 2026, 12:2737,356-56
16 Aug 2026, 03:2537,412-61
14 Aug 2026, 14:3837,473-42
13 Aug 2026, 08:3437,515-49
12 Aug 2026, 06:1737,564first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,220
Videos
329
Links
2,080

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

34 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1955.9%
🤣1441.2%
👍12.94%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2026 to 3 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptosharkg1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 April 2026 to 3 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Apr 2026, 13:29 UTC≈2,440 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Пошел второй день без казино, природа настолько очистилась что по центру города начали плавать дельфины,утки снова начитают летать, а все владельцы казино снова вернулись в коммуналки

4👍1

2 Apr 2026, 17:29 UTC≈2,270 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Игра , в которую я играл в периоды без казино, сколько тысяч часов тут наиграно) Даже донатил несколько раз, вроде ничего интересного, а на самом деле самый кайф

2 Apr 2026, 16:49 UTC≈1,500 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Помогает ли демо счет с лудоманией? Лично для меня это может быть решением если это в первый 1-2 дня после затяжной серии. Но по итогу видя сильную отдачу хочется играть еще сильнее. Как вы считаете, есть ли малейший смысл играть на демо вместо своих?

3

2 Apr 2026, 11:49 UTC≈1,530 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026

План максимально простой Зарабатывать, половину отдавать сразу в долги, вторую половину на жизнь Привычных гивов в этом канале уже не будет, только полностью фри конкурсы Если кому-то надо акк изикеша где через 50 дней начислят 100к , то могу продать за 70к(фулл перевяжете акк на все свое), можно и через гаранта Отписать можете в комменты под этот пост

🤣6

2 Apr 2026, 11:43 UTC≈1,370 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Проснулся, первая цель сейчас это раздать фулл все долги, общая сумма 8-9к долларов что не сильно много учитывая общий проигрыш, да и много раз мог полностью его закрыть, но каждый раз думал похуй потом отдам.

🤣6

2 Apr 2026, 03:26 UTC≈1,370 views6 reactions3 Starsread 2 September 2026

Я просто взял и подарил целое состояние тем кого даже не знаю, просто из-за своей жадности. Как говорил один человек)) Богат не тот у кого денег много, а тот кому их хватает(вроде правильно написал) Суть в том что сколько бы денег у меня не было, мне всегда было мало, хотя каждый раз я мог уйти и отдыхать несколько лет, вместо этого дарил деньги владельцам казино. Но при этом существуют люди с доходом в дясятки раз н

4🤣2

2 Apr 2026, 02:50 UTC≈1,160 views0 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Может мне надо начать пить антидепрессанты? У меня депрессия уже почти 2 года, причем в очень глубокой форме

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptosharkg1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 451,841 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“.” (@cryptosharkg1), 36,725 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptosharkg1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.