Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Shree Win VIP CHANNEL

Channel

Shree Win VIP CHANNEL

@cryptoupsc

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

500,419subscribers

-3,720 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001998196021
TypeChannel
Username@cryptoupsc
CreatedBetween 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptoupsc

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

42.5 average views per post against 500,419 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.009%. Across the 1,215 registered channels in the same cohort — 316,278–999,488 subscribers — the middle half sit between 1.65% and 11.5%, with a median of 4.01%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (3 August 2026 2 September 2026)
Posts measured213 of 216 published in the window (213 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled9,061
Mature posts only0.018% over 54 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers500,419 measured 2 September 2026
Cohortb316228 · 1,215 channels · p10 0.492% · p25 1.65% · p50 4.01% · p75 11.5% · p90 22.4%
Position in cohort0.000th percentile · 1/500 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 2 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

500,419504,139502,2797 August 2026 — 504,139 subscribers7 August 2026 — 504,139 subscribers8 August 2026 — 504,066 subscribers9 August 2026 — 503,885 subscribers10 August 2026 — 503,790 subscribers11 August 2026 — 503,616 subscribers12 August 2026 — 503,396 subscribers13 August 2026 — 503,306 subscribers14 August 2026 — 503,145 subscribers16 August 2026 — 502,919 subscribers17 August 2026 — 502,652 subscribers18 August 2026 — 502,534 subscribers19 August 2026 — 502,337 subscribers20 August 2026 — 502,263 subscribers22 August 2026 — 501,997 subscribers23 August 2026 — 501,711 subscribers25 August 2026 — 501,510 subscribers26 August 2026 — 501,340 subscribers27 August 2026 — 501,201 subscribers28 August 2026 — 501,139 subscribers29 August 2026 — 501,037 subscribers30 August 2026 — 500,843 subscribers31 August 2026 — 500,669 subscribers1 September 2026 — 500,559 subscribers2 September 2026 — 500,419 subscribers7 August 20262 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 25 days, net -3,720. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 499,861–504,697 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 04:34500,419-140
1 Sept 2026, 07:47500,559-110
31 Aug 2026, 06:28500,669-174
30 Aug 2026, 06:57500,843-194
29 Aug 2026, 06:53501,037-102
28 Aug 2026, 03:45501,139-62
27 Aug 2026, 04:48501,201-139
26 Aug 2026, 02:02501,340-170
25 Aug 2026, 02:56501,510-201
23 Aug 2026, 21:07501,711-286
22 Aug 2026, 08:38501,997-266
20 Aug 2026, 22:08502,263-74
19 Aug 2026, 23:15502,337-197
18 Aug 2026, 20:16502,534-118
17 Aug 2026, 19:04502,652-267
16 Aug 2026, 17:35502,919-226
14 Aug 2026, 23:55503,145-161
13 Aug 2026, 17:17503,306-90
12 Aug 2026, 18:38503,396-220
11 Aug 2026, 19:14503,616first reading

Engagement

236 posts held, back to 2 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.009%
avg views ÷ 500,419 subscribers
Avg views / post
42.5
213 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
216
of 236 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 213 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held236 (2 June 20262 September 2026)
Views total9,061
Reactions total36
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 15:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
80
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

52 reactions across 32 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3057.7%
🥰1630.8%
💯35.77%
🙉23.85%
😢11.92%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 236 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 236 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 09:12 UTC67 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026

✍️✍️A brand new trova platform is coming on 3th September at 10.30am✍️✍️ 💎🍄SHREEWIN 🤩🍄💎 ✅😞1-6 Level commission and salary (High commission Percentage) ✅😞 Daily ads support ✅ 😞Daily free gift cards ✅ 😞Advance available ( Only trusted one on low realise first) ✅😞 Slots agents welcome only under me ✅😞 Fix prediction with 2-5 levels ( Danzer zone 2-3 time in a month) ✅😞 No deposit issue, no withdrawal issue, no

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 236 posts we hold for @cryptoupsc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

GOA GAMES OFFICIAL
@GoaGames_Bounty_Games · 30,231
#1
GOA GAMES OFFICIAL
@Goa_Mall · 1,304
#2
V3 GAME OFFICIAL CRYPTO
@Surewin_jaiclub · 3,673
#3
🏆GOA GAMES VIP🏆
@GOAGAMESVIP88 · 689
#4
🔥 GOA GAMES PREDICTION🔥
@goagamesssamara · 4,161
#5
Crypto Goa Game🏆
@Crypto_GoaGame_Bitcoin · 221,628
#6
Crypto Goa Games🏆
@Crypto_Goagame_Game · 229,720
#7
101Game Prediction Channel
@official101game · 103,179
#8
BIG MUMBAI OFFICIAL🏆
@BigMumbai_Mumbai · 192,070
#9
ɢᴏᴀ ɢᴀᴍᴇꜱ ᴘʀᴇᴅɪᴄᴛɪᴏɴ ᴠɪᴘ
@Goagamesprediction1 · 5,361
#10
Goa Games All Prediction 🏆
@Goagameofficial · 378
#11
𝙎𝙄𝙆𝙆𝙄𝙈 𝙗𝙮 𝘾𝙝𝙖𝙢𝙞𝙮𝙖
@GoaByChamiya · 25,681
#12
TASHAN WIN
@tashanwingiftcodes · 4,190 (as read 11 August 2026)
#13
TFK ⚔️
@TFK_x · 1,740
#14
BDG 1 MINUTE VIP PREDICTION
@BDGGAMEVIPOFFICIAL · 39,517
#15
🎖 New Ganesha mall🎖
@Ganeshanewmall · 1,229 (as read 11 August 2026)
#16
🚀L7Win 1Minute🚀
@lottery7_vipwingo7711 · 312,758
#17
Lottery 7 official (Crypto)
@crypto_lottery7_sikkimgame · 295,555 (as read 11 August 2026)
#18
Crypto Raja Luck Giftcode🎁
@Crypto_RajaluckGiftcode · 201,930
#19
51 Game official
@game51games · 2,445
#20
91 Club Vip Sureshot🏆
@upsc_91_club_crypto · 282,643
#21
JaiClub पैसा कमाओ घर बैठे
@jaiclub_club_yaarwin_jay · 130,572
#22
Dixit Prediction World
@dixitpredictionworld · 91,471
#23
𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗘𝗥 𝗥𝗔𝗝𝗨 💸
@tradewithraju1 · 87,231
#24

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

JaiClub पैसा कमाओ घर बैठे
@jaiclub_club_yaarwin_jay · 130,572
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 25 here — alongside 24 others — read 13 August 2026
Kwggame 🏅🏅 Crypto
@Crypto_Kwg_Game_Btwwin · 128,316
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 21 here — alongside 20 others — read 13 August 2026
Crypto Goa Games🏆
@Crypto_Goagame_Game · 229,720
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 11 August 2026
Crypto Jai club Lottery
@Bitcointraders_Crypto_JioLottery · 85,293
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 18 August 2026
Crypto Goa Game🏆
@Crypto_GoaGame_Bitcoin · 221,628
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 11 August 2026
Crypto 66 Lottery🏆
@Crypto_Lottery_66Lottery1 · 153,333
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 12 August 2026
Railway Jobs RRB | NTPC | JE | ALP | Group D
@Railway_Jobs_NTPC_ALP_JE_Group · 120,047
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 18 August 2026
91 Club Vip Sureshot🏆
@upsc_91_club_crypto · 282,643
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 11 August 2026
Bigdaddy winzCrypto
@bdgwind_daddyt_gamer · 250,401
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 9 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Shree Win VIP CHANNEL” (@cryptoupsc), 500,419 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoupsc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.