Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
30 measurements spanning 39 days, net +1,132. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 91,831–102,556 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 14:18
98,025
-1,936
16 Sept 2026, 06:41
99,961
-1,270
14 Sept 2026, 16:20
101,231
+1,208
13 Sept 2026, 04:37
100,023
+6,955
11 Sept 2026, 09:59
93,068
-828
8 Sept 2026, 12:41
93,896
-824
5 Sept 2026, 05:17
94,720
-423
3 Sept 2026, 10:23
95,143
-526
2 Sept 2026, 03:23
95,669
-201
1 Sept 2026, 05:45
95,870
-261
31 Aug 2026, 02:22
96,131
-428
30 Aug 2026, 03:36
96,559
-237
29 Aug 2026, 05:53
96,796
-200
28 Aug 2026, 04:43
96,996
-2,286
27 Aug 2026, 02:39
99,282
-1,830
26 Aug 2026, 04:04
101,112
-206
25 Aug 2026, 04:56
101,318
+4,937
24 Aug 2026, 01:29
96,381
-1,020
22 Aug 2026, 08:57
97,401
-1,803
20 Aug 2026, 20:58
99,204
first reading
Engagement
306 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.66%
avg views ÷ 98,025 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,630
195 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
195
of 306 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 84 of 195 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026
Posts held
306 (30 July 2026 – 18 September 2026)
Views total
317,227
Reactions total
16,280
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
19 Sept 2026, 09:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,480
Videos
≈48
Links
≈1,890
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
28,521 reactions across 150 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
5,815
20.4%
🔥
5,739
20.1%
😁
5,728
20.1%
❤
5,665
19.9%
🎉
5,574
19.5%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 150 of the 306 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28,521 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 306 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔥 Hyperliquid открыла займы под HYPE
Hyperliquid 18 сентября запустила займы в USDC и USDT под залог HYPE и Bitcoin.
📊 Общий объем займов уже достиг $269 млн, а максимальный LTV для HYPE составляет 65%.
HYPE после запуска вырос на 13% и обновил исторический максимум около $90,92.
🔥 О’Лири снова ставит на крипторынок
Кевин О’Лири снова наращивает криптопозиции перед следующим рыночным циклом.
📊 Он считает интеграцию блокчейна крупной биржей возможным переломным моментом для всей индустрии.
Bitcoin, по его оценке, может занять до 3% альтернативных портфелей.*
🔥 BTC держится у $78 000
18 сентября Bitcoin восстановился к $78 000 после отскока из зоны $75 300–75 600.
📊 ФРС и ЕЦБ сохраняют жесткий курс, а это сдерживает спрос на рискованные активы.
Позитивный приток в спотовые ETF США пока не отменяет фазу консолидации.*
🔥 Reform UK снижает налог на крипту
Reform UK предложила снизить налог на прирост капитала от криптовалют в Британии до 10%.
📊 Больше £100 млн в год смогут сэкономить 240 крупнейших криптоинвесторов страны.
Это может усилить интерес к крипторынку Великобритании.
🔥 SBI вложилась в dtcpay
SBI Group стала стратегическим инвестором сингапурской dtcpay, доведя раунд Series A до $25 млн.
📊 dtcpay развивает регулируемую инфраструктуру для платежей в стейблкоинах в Сингапуре и других юрисдикциях.
Это усиливает позиции SBI в цифровых активах Юго-Восточной Азии.
🔥 Наследование крипты не готово
Только 32% криптоинвесторов подготовили план передачи активов, показало исследование Traders Union.
📊 Большинство хотят оставить криптовалюту семье, но часто не дают инструкций для доступа.
Даже законные наследники могут не получить крипту без ключей или seed-фраз.
🔥 Avalanche попал в поле NYSE
ICE оценивает Avalanche для платформы токенизированной торговли акциями с расчетами в блокчейне.
📊 Официального соглашения нет, но AVAX уже тестирует сопротивление у 200-дневной SMA.
Пока это сильный сигнал интереса, а не подтвержденный запуск.
🚀 World Money выходит глобально
World запустила финансовый суперапп World Money более чем в 150 странах.
💳 Приложение объединяет платежи в стейблкоинах, доходность активов и трейдинг с самостоятельным хранением.
Сервис отделили от World ID, разделив финансы и цифровую идентификацию.
🔥 NEAR взлетел на теме приватности
NEAR вырос на 10% после запуска приватных бессрочных фьючерсов на near.com.
📊 Конфиденциальный TVL экосистемы подскочил с более $40 млн до свыше $70 млн.
Прорыв выше $3,64 усилит импульс, но перекупленность уже повышает риск отката.
🚀 Coinbase идет в местные банки
Coinbase и Stablecore подключают криптосервисы для местных банков и кредитных союзов США.
🏦 Сеть Stablecore охватывает более 3000 учреждений и уже включает Amarillo National Bank.
Банки смогут запускать цифровые активы без замены своей инфраструктуры.
🔥 Кит поддержал Ethereum
Кит за три дня перевел $46 млн из BTC в ETH через Hyperliquid.
📉 17 сентября спотовые Ethereum-ETF в США показали третий день чистого оттока.
Следующий сильный импульс ETH может прийти после выхода из диапазона $2,370–2,550.
🔥 Санкции против BitBank
США ввели санкции против иранской биржи BitBank за переводы сотен миллионов долларов КСИР.
📊 OFAC считает BitBank ключевым криптопроектом сети финансиста Бабака Занджани.
Криптосектор Ирана остается новой мишенью для американских санкций.
Showing the 12 most recent of 306 posts we hold for @cryptoybeta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cryptoy ₿” (@cryptoybeta), 98,025 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoybeta.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.