Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Canal SEMNOME

Channel

Canal SEMNOME

@csemn0me

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,495subscribers

-43 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001292262554
TypeChannel
Username@csemn0me
Created23 February 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/csemn0me

Growth

2,4952,5432,5196 August 2026 — 2,538 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,540 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,538 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,543 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,536 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,507 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,508 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,510 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,500 subscribers3 September 2026 — 2,503 subscribers9 September 2026 — 2,495 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 33 days, net -43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,488–2,550 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 02:382,495-8
3 Sept 2026, 08:422,503+3
30 Aug 2026, 19:042,500-10
27 Aug 2026, 12:542,510+2
24 Aug 2026, 09:442,508+1
20 Aug 2026, 17:572,507-29
17 Aug 2026, 10:152,536-7
13 Aug 2026, 13:272,543+5
10 Aug 2026, 19:182,538-2
7 Aug 2026, 09:362,540+2
6 Aug 2026, 23:302,538first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 15s
Average length
1m 43s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

238 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💊10242.9%
custom 49967629378267393004016.8%
🗿3816.0%
🔥218.82%
👌104.20%
🤩62.52%
52.10%
🎉41.68%
🏆41.68%
👏41.68%
😍41.68%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 238 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 21:50 UTC334 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @slashbiz_syndicateVideo

Thousands in Japan protest construction of first mosque in Fujisawa Locals object to a building that is far larger than the nearby Shinto shrine, warning about public prayers and cultural shifts As Japan’s Muslim population continues to rise, site work has already begun.

custom 499676293782673930034💊6🎉3

5 Aug 2026, 10:09 UTC419 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👌8🏆4

3 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTC431 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @jewish_tricksVideo

Israel detonated 700 tons of explosives beneath Beaufort Castle in South Lebanon at night. The 900-year-old Crusader castle is a UNESCO-listed endangered heritage site. Built by Fulk, King of Jerusalem, it was captured by Saladin, retaken by the Christians, held by the Knights Templar, the Mamluks under Baibars and finally taken by the Ottomans. Not only are Israelis a threat to humanity they are a threat to human h

5👌2

31 Jul 2026, 22:21 UTC568 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

A Canadian man was charged with "child luring" charges in 2020 police tracked the username "Fus_ro_dah" (Skyrim), seized his phones laptops etc. (no evidence found) then charged/convicted him, he served 18 months, the problem? The man they were looking for was Fus__ro_dah. Somehow nobody noticed a single underscore (the REAL culprit had TWO underscores) they ruined and destroyed a man's entire life, despite absolut

💊27

31 Jul 2026, 18:10 UTC639 views44 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🗿38custom 49967629378267393006

31 Jul 2026, 17:40 UTC541 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @inmagnaexcitatioPhoto

Chaos from the Moroccan 🇲🇦 invaders continues to rule the streets in Ceuta. 🇪🇸 Spanish police beat their own people back. Some invaders forced back through the gates by the military, assaults, pooping, you name it. >Zerosum24

💊20

31 Jul 2026, 17:29 UTC442 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @inmagnaexcitatioPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

31 Jul 2026, 13:09 UTC422 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @CIG_telegramVideo

🇲🇦🇪🇸 Other Moroccan migrants are resorting to robbing supermarkets and breaking into people's homes to avoid starving. @CIG_telegram

🔥16👏4🎉1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @csemn0me. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Canal SEMNOME” (@csemn0me), 2,495 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/csemn0me.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.