Channel
@cseupscnotes
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
148,977subscribers
-4,075 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001079622106 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cseupscnotes |
| Description | UPSC Notes |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 37 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cseupscnotes |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 08:21 | 148,977 | -581 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 17:19 | 149,558 | -385 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 149,943 | -175 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 18:15 | 150,118 | -89 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:58 | 150,207 | -90 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:20 | 150,297 | -111 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 09:18 | 150,408 | -216 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 14:55 | 150,624 | -256 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:41 | 150,880 | -104 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 150,984 | -87 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:54 | 151,071 | -74 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:26 | 151,145 | -97 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:43 | 151,242 | -83 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 151,325 | -40 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 151,365 | -79 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:58 | 151,444 | -70 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 151,514 | -31 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:12 | 151,545 | -66 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 151,611 | -89 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 151,700 | first reading |
46 posts held, back to 18 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 126 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 46 (18 May 2026 – 6 October 2026) |
| Views total | 2,279 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Oct 2026, 22:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
234 reactions across 24 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 159 | 67.9% | |
| ❤ | 73 | 31.2% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.855% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 234 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
There are 4 types of genetic diseases 1⃣ Single Gene - Disorders caused by abnormality or mutation in the sequence of one gene. 2⃣ Multifactorial - Caused by a combination of environmental factors as well as mutations in multiple genes. 3⃣ Chromosomal - Abnormalities in chromosome structure such has missing or extra copies 4⃣ Mitochondrial - Caused by a mutation in non-chromosomal DNA of mitochondria
#Food_Preservatives are substances added to food to prevent or slow down spoilage and maintain natural colours and flavours. Two reasons for food spoilage • Microbial contamination • Fats reacting with oxygen (oxidation) Preservative criteria • Non-toxic • Functional • Flavourless • Economical Sorbic acid - It is a food preservative which protects many food varieties from yeast and mold spoilage. It is an organi…
Coal Gasification is one of the clean coal technologies and involves the process of converting coal into synthesis gas/ syngas. • Syngas is a mixture of hydrogen (H2), carbon monoxide (CO) and carbon dioxide (CO2). • The by-products of coal gasification include coke, coal tar, sulfur, ammonia and fly ash, all having their own potential uses. • CO2 and ammonia are further reacted to produce urea. • Syngas can also be …
Environmental Impact Assessment or EIA is the process or study which ▪️predicts the effect of a proposed industrial/infrastructural project on the environment. ▪️prevents the proposed activity/project from being approved without proper oversight or taking adverse consequences into account. ▪️compares various alternatives for a project and seeks to identify the one which represents the best combination of economic and…
Hotspot volcanism is a type of volcanism that occurs at the interior of the lithospheric plates rather than plate margins. Well known hotspots include- 1) Hawaiian Hotspot 2) Yellowstone Hotspot 3) Reunion Hotspot Hotspot volcanism occurs due to abnormally hot centres in the mantle known as "mantle plumes". Most of the mantle plumes lie far from tectonic plate boundaries (e.g. Hawaiian Hotspot), but there are some…
Bonn Convention: The Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals, also known as the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS) or the Bonn Convention, is an international agreement that aims to conserve migratory species within their migratory ranges. India is a signatory to this Convention.
Washington Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora or CITES, aims at regulating the international trade of specimens of endangered animals and plants. India has ratified this Convention in 1976
Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layers. it will help reduce the production and consumption of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), potent greenhouse gases (GHGs), and thus to avoid global warming by up to 0.4°C this century
Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism is an initiative of Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter and YouTube with the objective of disrupting terrorist abuse on their respective platforms by dedicated technology, counterterrorism and operations teams.
https://youtu.be/rbfbKMWvfDY?si=tuIDEQP-LyNDRKCV #newvideo
❤2
Join Soon https://www.facebook.com/share/19GwCWsPAR/ https://www.youtube.com/@NonuNiniTV https://www.facebook.com/share/1MLbEUpzw5/
❤2
Join Soon https://www.facebook.com/share/19GwCWsPAR/ https://www.youtube.com/@NonuNiniTV https://www.facebook.com/share/1MLbEUpzw5/
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @cseupscnotes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 38 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UPSC Civil Services Upsc Prelims Mains Exam Current Affairs GS Gk Tricks SSC CGL IAS IFS IPS EPFO PCS UPPCS MPPCS Bihar PCS” (@cseupscnotes), 148,977 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cseupscnotes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.