Channel
@css_mind
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,682subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001361008099 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @css_mind |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/css_mind |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 2,682 | -5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 04:12 | 2,687 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 2,688 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:42 | 2,693 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 2,694 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 2,695 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 2,695 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
824 reactions across 20 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 824 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 824reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 September 2024 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Кстати если у вас разные конфиги для разных директорий (например у меня для работы один юзернейм и имеил в одном конфиге, а для фриланса другой в другом), то у гита есть вот такая штука. Что-то вроде условных импортов. На скрине буквально написано, что если ты сейчас в директории freelance, то сходи и возьми вот этот файл конфига. А то что выше в секции core, и если бы там еще что-то было, остается для всех вне за…
❤47
Просто напоминаю, что существует сайт на старомонгольском. У него уникальный режим письма: сверху вниз и слева направо. https://president.mn/mng/
❤58
А вы знали, что next ломает вам типизацию перменных? Если вы напишите ... @property --var { syntax: "<percentage>"; initial-value: 0%; inherits: true; } ...то next оптимизирует до initial-value: 0;, потому что cssnano в текущей последней версии next считает что это хорошо. И работать конечно ничего не будет. Что делать? Писать initial-value: 0.0%;, либо менять тип на <length-percentage>. Ну и ждать пока n…
❤45
И еще сегодня очередной день рождения CSS2 🥳🎂 28 годиков. Старше меня!
❤25
Между прочим interpolate-size завезли в хром аж полгода назад. Смотрите что мы теперь можем делать с details. https://dimox.name/animate-details-element-using-css/
❤28
Из аудитории поступил вопрос что такое шортхенды. Это от английского short hand, короткие руки. Так вот, представьте тиранозавра. У него лапки короткие, печатать неудобно. Поэтому он печатает не border-width, border-color и border-style отдельно, а сразу все в border. Чтобы меньше печатать короткими лапками. А вообще официальное определение есть на MDN, например. 🦖🦖🦖
❤24
Между прочим в сегодняшнюю агенду CSS Working Group включено обсуждение возможности вынимать единичные значения из шортхендов.
❤20
Сегодня день рождения CSS2 🥳🎂
❤65
Такие красивые видео с демок теперь можно записывать так просто!
❤42
Мне было сегодня лет, когда я узнала, что в css оказывается есть свойство resize. https://codepen.io/ariarzer/pen/EaxmXKY
❤70
Нам наконец-то завезут в следующем хроме функцию attr() в том виде, в котором ее планировали много лет назад! Источник: https://developer.chrome.com/blog/advanced-attr Раньше с её помощью можно было получать значение атрибута только в виде строки. Теперь можно будет указывать тип значения, и это очень важно, потому что преобразования типов в css нет как явления. И если у вас в атрибуте лежало число, использовать ег…
❤37
У меня сегодня первый рабочий день на новой работе, и я конечно же первым делом потащила в прод container queries. Поэтому хочу показать вам красивую адаптивную сетку с сепараторами - https://codepen.io/ariarzer/pen/dPbEKaq P.S. комментарии по демкам всегда принимаются в личку, ссылка в закрепе. P.P.S на самом деле сетка красивая, а вот код не очень, писать столько выражений для каждого случая - жесть. Но в жизни р…
❤59
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @css_mind. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,001,159 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@css_mind named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CSS mind” (@css_mind), 2,682 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/css_mind.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.