Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for культурные хроники

Channel

культурные хроники

@culturalchronicles

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

277subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001908987570
TypeChannel
Username@culturalchronicles
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/culturalchronicles

Growth

2732792767 August 2026 — 273 subscribers8 August 2026 — 273 subscribers15 August 2026 — 274 subscribers22 August 2026 — 275 subscribers28 August 2026 — 276 subscribers7 September 2026 — 279 subscribers14 September 2026 — 277 subscribers2777 August 202614 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 37 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 272–280 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 01:21277-2
7 Sept 2026, 01:20279+3
28 Aug 2026, 14:22276+1
22 Aug 2026, 08:46275+1
15 Aug 2026, 00:39274+1
8 Aug 2026, 08:46273no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:28273first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

74 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2331.1%
😁1925.7%
1520.3%
custom 52151798790074097051317.6%
34.05%
🌚11.35%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC34 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Интернет снова всех обманул. Несколько дней назад завирусилась архивная фотография со съёмок «Талантливого мистера Рипли», на которой Мэтт Дэймон якобы читает «Одиссею» Гомера. Поводом для этого стала публикация Грэга Уильямса, автора снимка, который выложил его на фоне выхода фильма. Красивый круг замкнулся, все в восторге. Но, как это обычно бывает, стоило копнуть чуть глубже и магия рассеялась. На самом деле в р

32

7 Aug 2026, 06:06 UTC37 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пейзажи у холмов Pentland во время цветения вереска, Шотландия

5

6 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC48 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я их покормила, если что

😁7

6 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC47 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Чисто сельский вайб, утки на фоне возмущаются

😁41custom 52151798790074097051

6 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC49 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥10

6 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC48 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @questianonbot

📨 Получено сообщение! ⁨Читали "Если все кошки в мире исчезнут"? Как вам?⁩

5 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC50 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Иначе говоря, Пруст пытается интеллектуально уложить меня на лопатки, а я сопротивляюсь. Вы наблюдаете мой рукопашный бой с мёртвым французским классиком. Он - удушающий приём своим трёхстраничным предложением, а я ему: «Я не тупая, сейчас перечитаю»

😁82🌚1

5 Aug 2026, 18:24 UTC52 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

...наша социальная личность создается мышлением других людей. Даже такой простой акт, как «видеть человека, с которым мы знакомы», является в значительной части актом интеллектуальным. Мы наполняем физическую внешность существа, которое мы видим, всеми ранее составившимися у нас понятиями о нем, и в целостной картине его, мысленно рисуемой нами, эти понятия несомненно играют преобладающую роль. На ранней стадии уже

custom 521517987900740970552

5 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTC49 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В августе править бал будет Франция. Люди, на протяжении нескольких лет непрерывно рекомендующие мне данный цикл, поспособствовали завышению ожиданий. Однако я прилагаю значительные усилия, чтобы контролировать собственные требования к творчеству Пруста. #чточитаю #книжныймарафон

custom 521517987900740970573

4 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC55 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Слегка запоздалые июльские итоги

🔥13

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @culturalchronicles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“культурные хроники” (@culturalchronicles), 277 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/culturalchronicles.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.